FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1991967079> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1991967079 endingPage "2098" @default.
• W1991967079 startingPage "2091" @default.
• W1991967079 abstract "Background: Although previous biomechanical research has demonstrated the superiority of the suture-bridge rotator cuff repair over double-row repair from a mechanical point of view, no articles have described the structural and functional outcomes of this type of procedure. Hypothesis: The structural and functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair may be different between the single-row, double-row, and combined double-row and suture-bridge (compression double-row) techniques. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: There were 206 shoulders in 201 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears that underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Eleven patients were lost to follow-up. Sixty-five shoulders were repaired using the single-row, 23 shoulders using the double-row, and 107 shoulders using the compression double-row techniques. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at an average of 38.5 months (range, 24-74 months) after rotator cuff repair. Postoperative cuff integrity was determined using Sugaya’s classification of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: The retear rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were 10.8%, 26.1%, and 4.7%, respectively, for the single-row, double-row, and compression double-row techniques. In the subcategory of large and massive rotator cuff tears, the retear rate in the compression double-row group (3 of 40 shoulders, 7.5%) was significantly less than those in the single-row group (5 of 8 shoulders, 62.5%, P < .001) and the double-row group (5 of 12 shoulders, 41.7%, P < .01). Postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with a retear were significantly lower than those in patients without a retear for all 3 techniques. Conclusion: The additional suture bridges decreased the retear rate for large and massive tears. The combination of the double-row and suture-bridge techniques, which had the lowest rate of postoperative retear, is an effective option for arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff tendons because the postoperative functional outcome in patients with a retear is inferior to that without retear." @default.
• W1991967079 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1991967079 creator A5001850411 @default.
• W1991967079 creator A5005130055 @default.
• W1991967079 creator A5021135046 @default.
• W1991967079 creator A5046044457 @default.
• W1991967079 creator A5047746476 @default.
• W1991967079 creator A5062121455 @default.
• W1991967079 creator A5070630178 @default.
• W1991967079 date "2011-07-22" @default.
• W1991967079 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1991967079 title "Functional and Structural Outcomes of Single-Row Versus Double-Row Versus Combined Double-Row and Suture-Bridge Repair for Rotator Cuff Tears" @default.
• W1991967079 cites W1863138831 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W1975378728 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W1980363305 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W1985792099 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W1987998660 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W1988653356 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W1993515038 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W1996614809 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2007130650 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2008384745 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2009630595 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2013302486 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2024645680 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2043037985 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2047557562 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2049494043 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2050537861 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2064301576 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2087114752 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2090264947 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2095943391 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2097652135 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2100214471 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2102376642 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2102728551 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2111004831 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2116024004 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2116530321 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2125019240 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2130238026 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2162333916 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2167851219 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2168927320 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2170163373 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W2278008992 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W4229841226 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W4247798302 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W4253502356 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W4255097449 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W4294291846 @default.
• W1991967079 cites W4297832561 @default.
• W1991967079 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511415660" @default.
• W1991967079 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21785001" @default.
• W1991967079 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W1991967079 type Work @default.
• W1991967079 sameAs 1991967079 @default.
• W1991967079 citedByCount "166" @default.
• W1991967079 countsByYear W19919670792012 @default.
• W1991967079 countsByYear W19919670792013 @default.
• W1991967079 countsByYear W19919670792014 @default.
• W1991967079 countsByYear W19919670792015 @default.
• W1991967079 countsByYear W19919670792016 @default.
• W1991967079 countsByYear W19919670792017 @default.
• W1991967079 countsByYear W19919670792018 @default.
• W1991967079 countsByYear W19919670792019 @default.
• W1991967079 countsByYear W19919670792020 @default.
• W1991967079 countsByYear W19919670792021 @default.
• W1991967079 countsByYear W19919670792022 @default.
• W1991967079 countsByYear W19919670792023 @default.
• W1991967079 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1991967079 hasAuthorship W1991967079A5001850411 @default.
• W1991967079 hasAuthorship W1991967079A5005130055 @default.
• W1991967079 hasAuthorship W1991967079A5021135046 @default.
• W1991967079 hasAuthorship W1991967079A5046044457 @default.
• W1991967079 hasAuthorship W1991967079A5047746476 @default.
• W1991967079 hasAuthorship W1991967079A5062121455 @default.
• W1991967079 hasAuthorship W1991967079A5070630178 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConcept C2776030733 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConcept C2776511800 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConcept C2777325788 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConcept C2778275304 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConcept C2780017030 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConceptScore W1991967079C126838900 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConceptScore W1991967079C141071460 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConceptScore W1991967079C143409427 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConceptScore W1991967079C2776030733 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConceptScore W1991967079C2776511800 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConceptScore W1991967079C2777325788 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConceptScore W1991967079C2778275304 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConceptScore W1991967079C2779162959 @default.
• W1991967079 hasConceptScore W1991967079C2780017030 @default.

• next