Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1992048658> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 83 of
83
with 100 items per page.
- W1992048658 endingPage "235" @default.
- W1992048658 startingPage "225" @default.
- W1992048658 abstract "We used a rigorous case study methodology to examine one supervisory dyad's work together during one semester. We used the best-worst strategy of several recent researchers, multiple sources of qualitative and quantitative process data, and the perspectives both of the participants and of observers. A number of findings provide hypotheses to guide future research. For example. Session 2 was identified as best by both participants. That it focused on relationship issues between the participants is consistent with other findings that the supervisor-supervisee relationship was a primary focus during the first several supervisory sessions. Despite its shortcomings, the science of counseling and psychotherapy rests on a solid empirical foundation. Yet the same is not true for the science of clinical supervision, which is still very much in its infancy. In commenting on this, Holloway and Hosford (1983) observed that scientific endeavor progresses through a series of stages, the first of which is observing a phenomenon in its natural environment. They maintained that observation should be the proper research emphasis at this particular stage of the science of supervision. At first glance, this prescription would seem inappropriate, for observational data are amply represented in the supervision literature. For example, Searles (1955) used case material to introduce a phenomenon that others since have called parallel processes; Markowitz (1958) presented a retrospective, comparative account of supervision that he received from each of several supervisors; and Mueller and Kell (1972) used observations of supervision for their rich formulations of supervisory processes. The supervision literature is replete with such examples." @default.
- W1992048658 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1992048658 creator A5046534258 @default.
- W1992048658 creator A5051929274 @default.
- W1992048658 creator A5061427069 @default.
- W1992048658 date "1987-06-01" @default.
- W1992048658 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W1992048658 title "Clinical supervision: An intensive case study." @default.
- W1992048658 cites W1479788144 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W1488653990 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W1788609770 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W1836743013 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W1984689079 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W1989735017 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W1994153241 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W1998887133 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2004184632 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2007487446 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2007898003 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2014285780 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2018603926 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2039078537 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2046791434 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2048721843 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2066069928 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2068333469 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2086648218 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2089707848 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2095107020 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2104805049 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2113383833 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2117091369 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2127075864 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2129264276 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2130792563 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2402830900 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2410566027 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2916903760 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W585564893 @default.
- W1992048658 cites W2131334506 @default.
- W1992048658 doi "https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.18.3.225" @default.
- W1992048658 hasPublicationYear "1987" @default.
- W1992048658 type Work @default.
- W1992048658 sameAs 1992048658 @default.
- W1992048658 citedByCount "61" @default.
- W1992048658 countsByYear W19920486582012 @default.
- W1992048658 countsByYear W19920486582013 @default.
- W1992048658 countsByYear W19920486582014 @default.
- W1992048658 countsByYear W19920486582015 @default.
- W1992048658 countsByYear W19920486582016 @default.
- W1992048658 countsByYear W19920486582019 @default.
- W1992048658 countsByYear W19920486582020 @default.
- W1992048658 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1992048658 hasAuthorship W1992048658A5046534258 @default.
- W1992048658 hasAuthorship W1992048658A5051929274 @default.
- W1992048658 hasAuthorship W1992048658A5061427069 @default.
- W1992048658 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W1992048658 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
- W1992048658 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1992048658 hasConceptScore W1992048658C15744967 @default.
- W1992048658 hasConceptScore W1992048658C177713679 @default.
- W1992048658 hasConceptScore W1992048658C71924100 @default.
- W1992048658 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W1992048658 hasLocation W19920486581 @default.
- W1992048658 hasOpenAccess W1992048658 @default.
- W1992048658 hasPrimaryLocation W19920486581 @default.
- W1992048658 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
- W1992048658 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
- W1992048658 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
- W1992048658 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
- W1992048658 hasRelatedWork W2604872355 @default.
- W1992048658 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W1992048658 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W1992048658 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
- W1992048658 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
- W1992048658 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
- W1992048658 hasVolume "18" @default.
- W1992048658 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1992048658 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1992048658 magId "1992048658" @default.
- W1992048658 workType "article" @default.