FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W199207936> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W199207936 endingPage "147" @default.
• W199207936 startingPage "142" @default.
• W199207936 abstract "Abstract We evaluated a large-scale reform program with emphasis on curriculum-based instruction, ongoing progress monitoring, and systematic and continuing professional development. The design of the study included pre-, post-, and follow-up assessments of all students in reading and mathematics. In general, the treatment group performed statistically significantly better than the comparison group on all variables assessed. The substantial progress reflects the benefits of a balanced approach to school reform and the power of the School Renaissance program. Introduction Interest in improving the performance of all children gained renewed national prominence with the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 which was signed into law on January 8, 2002. Heralded as more than just a law, the act directs states and school districts to develop strong systems of accountability based upon student performance (U.S. Department of Education, 2002b). The law also gives states and school districts increased local control and flexibility, removing federal red tape and bureaucracy and putting decision-making in the hands of those at the local and state levels. To improve outcomes for children, No Child Left Behind provides parents of children from disadvantaged backgrounds the option to participate in public school choice programs or obtain supplemental services such as tutoring. To further support the achievement of improved results for all children, teachers are encouraged to use teaching methods based upon scientific research that shows they are effective (American Association of School Administrators, 2002; Dede, Honan, & Peters, 2005; U. S. Department of Education, 2002a,b, 2006). The emphasis on using scientifically based research as a guide for deciding how to teach directs teachers in how to help the large numbers of students who are failing to profit in America's classrooms. It also serves as a way to address the disappointing results (cf. Walmsley & Allington, 1995) of many instructional programs, some of which even complicate the learning process by offering approaches that are philosophically different from those offered in the classroom (Santa & Hoien, 1999). Therefore, most poor readers never catch up with their peers in reading and writing abilities, and the gap between low and high readers broadens as children progress through the grades (Stanovich, 1986; 1991). These changes have generated an increased interest in programs designed to improve achievement levels, especially those of children performing below grade level. One such program, School Renaissance, promises to improve academic achievement for all children using proven teaching methods and technology for using on-going formative evaluation data. School Renaissance is a commercially available K-12 comprehensive school reform program designed to help teachers use information to improve learning outcomes for their students (http://www.renlearn.com/). It is in the Catalog of School Reform Models produced jointly by the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory and The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement. Criteria for selecting models include evidence of effectiveness in improving student academic achievement, extent of replication, implementation assistance provided to schools, and comprehensiveness. The average cost of a full implementation can range from $30,000 to $75,000 per school per year of a three-year plan. Using formative evaluation data, professionals in participating schools learn to make better instructional and curricular decisions and are in a better position to accelerate learning (cf. Nunnery, Ross, & Goldfeder, 2003; Paul, 1992, 1993; Paul, Swanson, Zheng, & Hehenberger, 1997; Paul, VanderZee, Rue, & Swanson, 1996; Peak & DeWalt, 1994; Ross & Nunnery, 2005; School Renaissance Institute, 2002; Smith & Clark, 2001). The model focuses on developing foundational skills in reading, writing, and mathematics. …" @default.
• W199207936 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W199207936 creator A5050924821 @default.
• W199207936 creator A5064917469 @default.
• W199207936 creator A5069708420 @default.
• W199207936 date "2006-09-22" @default.
• W199207936 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W199207936 title "Promoting Academic Success for All Students" @default.
• W199207936 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W199207936 type Work @default.
• W199207936 sameAs 199207936 @default.
• W199207936 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W199207936 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W199207936 hasAuthorship W199207936A5050924821 @default.
• W199207936 hasAuthorship W199207936A5064917469 @default.
• W199207936 hasAuthorship W199207936A5069708420 @default.
• W199207936 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W199207936 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W199207936 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W199207936 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W199207936 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W199207936 hasConcept C2776007630 @default.
• W199207936 hasConcept C2780623907 @default.
• W199207936 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W199207936 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W199207936 hasConcept C51067260 @default.
• W199207936 hasConcept C51575053 @default.
• W199207936 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W199207936 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W199207936 hasConceptScore W199207936C145420912 @default.
• W199207936 hasConceptScore W199207936C15744967 @default.
• W199207936 hasConceptScore W199207936C17744445 @default.
• W199207936 hasConceptScore W199207936C19417346 @default.
• W199207936 hasConceptScore W199207936C199539241 @default.
• W199207936 hasConceptScore W199207936C2776007630 @default.
• W199207936 hasConceptScore W199207936C2780623907 @default.
• W199207936 hasConceptScore W199207936C47177190 @default.
• W199207936 hasConceptScore W199207936C509550671 @default.
• W199207936 hasConceptScore W199207936C51067260 @default.
• W199207936 hasConceptScore W199207936C51575053 @default.
• W199207936 hasConceptScore W199207936C71924100 @default.
• W199207936 hasConceptScore W199207936C94625758 @default.
• W199207936 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W199207936 hasLocation W1992079361 @default.
• W199207936 hasOpenAccess W199207936 @default.
• W199207936 hasPrimaryLocation W1992079361 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W124590202 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W1495783273 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W1589218631 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W16022307 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W165049838 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W168061762 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W2067471723 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W2079294327 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W2092642605 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W2140404934 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W2154244925 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W215971104 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W2536175368 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W2561967122 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W2890961984 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W317983549 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W326385850 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W54237028 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W846072692 @default.
• W199207936 hasRelatedWork W2289904796 @default.
• W199207936 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W199207936 isParatext "false" @default.
• W199207936 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W199207936 magId "199207936" @default.
• W199207936 workType "article" @default.