FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1992113607> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1992113607 endingPage "368" @default.
• W1992113607 startingPage "364" @default.
• W1992113607 abstract "Objectives: When ventilating a nonintubated patient in cardiac arrest, the European Resuscitation Council has recently recommended a decrease in the tidal volume from 0.8 to 1.2 L to 0.5 L, partly in an effort to decrease peak flow rate, and therefore, to minimize stomach inflation. The purpose of the present study was to examine the validity of the European Resuscitation Council's recommendation in terms of gas distribution between lungs and stomach in a bench model that simulates ventilation of a nonintubated patient with a self-inflatable bag representing tidal volumes of 0.5 and 0.75 L. Design: A bench model of a patient with a nonintubated airway was used consisting of face mask, manikin head, training lung (lung compliance, 50 mL/cm H2 O; airway resistance, 5 cm H2 O/L/sec), adjustable lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and simulated stomach. Setting: University hospital laboratory. Subjects: Thirty healthcare professionals. Interventions: Healthcare professionals performed 1-min bag-mask ventilation at each LESP level of 5, 10, and 15 cm H2 O at a rate of 12 breaths/min, using an adult and pediatric self-inflating bag, respectively. Volunteers were blinded to the LESP, which was randomly varied. Measurements and Main Results: Both types of self-inflating bags induced stomach inflation, with higher stomach and lower lung tidal volumes when the LESP was decreased. Lung tidal volume with the pediatric bag was significantly (p < .05) lower at all LESP levels when compared with the adult bag, and ranged between 240 mL at an LESP of 15 cm H2 O and 120 mL at an LESP of 5 cm H2 O. Stomach tidal volume with the adult bag ranged between 250 mL at an LESP of 15 cm H2 O and increased to 550 mL at an LESP of 5 cm H2 O. Stomach tidal volume with the pediatric bag was significantly lower (p < .05) at all LESP levels when compared with the adult bag and ranged between 70 mL at an LESP of 15 cm H2 O and 300 mL at an LESP of 5 cm H2 O. Conclusions: Our data support the recommendation of the European Resuscitation Council to decrease tidal volumes to 0.5 L when ventilating a cardiac arrest victim with an unprotected airway. A small tidal volume may be a better trade-off in the basic life support phase, as this may provide reasonable ventilation while avoiding massive stomach inflation. (Crit Care Med 1998; 26:364-368) When ventilating a nonintubated cardiac arrest patient, the European Resuscitation Council has recently recommended a decrease in the tidal volume from 0.8 to 1.2 L [1] to 0.5 L [2], partly in an effort to decrease peak flow rate, and therefore, to minimize stomach inflation. Ventilation volume has an effect on pH, CO2 elimination, and oxygenation when pulmonary blood flow is extremely low, such as during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or shock [3]. The Airway and Ventilation Management Working Group of the European Resuscitation Council [2] stated that ventilating a nonintubated cardiac arrest patient with a smaller tidal volume may be a better trade-off in order to provide reasonable ventilation, while avoiding massive stomach inflation that may result in life-threatening pulmonary complications. The gas distribution between lungs and stomach during positive-pressure ventilation in a nonintubated airway depends on patient characteristics (lower esophageal sphincter pressure [LESP], airway resistance, and respiratory system compliance) and performance variables of the rescuer applying positive-pressure ventilation (tidal volume, peak flow rate, and upper airway pressure). Thus, assessing the above-mentioned recommendation in a clinical study is difficult to perform due to many confounding variables that are difficult to control and to evaluate when emergently managing therapy during CPR. As an example of the usefulness of laboratory models of ventilation, the American Heart Association [1] recommended increasing inspiratory time when ventilating a nonintubated cardiac arrest patient [1,4]. For example, such a model has the advantage that each variable of respiratory mechanics can be controlled and adjusted to investigate a certain hypothesis. We [4,5] previously studied the effect of tidal volume and peak flow rate on gas distribution between lungs and stomach during mechanical positive-pressure ventilation, using a modification of the earlier described bench model of an unprotected airway. Although a mechanical ventilator is a valuable tool to study gas distribution in an unprotected airway, a self-inflatable bag is the device usually used by the emergency medical service and in the hospital during the initial care of a cardiac arrest victim. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to examine the validity of the European Resuscitation Council recommendation [2] in terms of gas distribution between lungs and stomach in a bench model that simulates positive-pressure ventilation of a nonintubated patient with self-inflatable bags representing tidal volumes of 0.5 L and 0.75 L. Since observations in an animal model [6] showed that the LESP decreases rapidly after an untreated cardiac arrest, we further evaluated the effect of a decreased LESP on gas distribution between lungs and stomach in this model." @default.
• W1992113607 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1992113607 creator A5005311004 @default.
• W1992113607 creator A5024046211 @default.
• W1992113607 creator A5061283393 @default.
• W1992113607 creator A5065323624 @default.
• W1992113607 creator A5081909012 @default.
• W1992113607 date "1998-02-01" @default.
• W1992113607 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W1992113607 title "Influence of tidal volume on the distribution of gas between the lungs and stomach in the nonintubated patient receiving positive-pressure ventilation" @default.
• W1992113607 cites W1981478268 @default.
• W1992113607 cites W2008704807 @default.
• W1992113607 cites W2013832116 @default.
• W1992113607 cites W2022397037 @default.
• W1992113607 cites W2028377084 @default.
• W1992113607 cites W2028654246 @default.
• W1992113607 cites W2033117873 @default.
• W1992113607 cites W2051824046 @default.
• W1992113607 cites W2079152568 @default.
• W1992113607 cites W2083245295 @default.
• W1992113607 cites W4302922770 @default.
• W1992113607 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199802000-00042" @default.
• W1992113607 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9468177" @default.
• W1992113607 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W1992113607 type Work @default.
• W1992113607 sameAs 1992113607 @default.
• W1992113607 citedByCount "136" @default.
• W1992113607 countsByYear W19921136072012 @default.
• W1992113607 countsByYear W19921136072013 @default.
• W1992113607 countsByYear W19921136072014 @default.
• W1992113607 countsByYear W19921136072015 @default.
• W1992113607 countsByYear W19921136072016 @default.
• W1992113607 countsByYear W19921136072017 @default.
• W1992113607 countsByYear W19921136072018 @default.
• W1992113607 countsByYear W19921136072019 @default.
• W1992113607 countsByYear W19921136072020 @default.
• W1992113607 countsByYear W19921136072021 @default.
• W1992113607 countsByYear W19921136072022 @default.
• W1992113607 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1992113607 hasAuthorship W1992113607A5005311004 @default.
• W1992113607 hasAuthorship W1992113607A5024046211 @default.
• W1992113607 hasAuthorship W1992113607A5061283393 @default.
• W1992113607 hasAuthorship W1992113607A5065323624 @default.
• W1992113607 hasAuthorship W1992113607A5081909012 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConcept C105922876 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConcept C200457457 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConcept C2777257755 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConcept C2777714996 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConcept C2778165595 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConcept C2779422922 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConcept C534529494 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConceptScore W1992113607C105922876 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConceptScore W1992113607C126322002 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConceptScore W1992113607C127413603 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConceptScore W1992113607C200457457 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConceptScore W1992113607C2777257755 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConceptScore W1992113607C2777714996 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConceptScore W1992113607C2778165595 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConceptScore W1992113607C2779422922 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConceptScore W1992113607C42219234 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConceptScore W1992113607C534529494 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConceptScore W1992113607C71924100 @default.
• W1992113607 hasConceptScore W1992113607C78519656 @default.
• W1992113607 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1992113607 hasLocation W19921136071 @default.
• W1992113607 hasLocation W19921136072 @default.
• W1992113607 hasOpenAccess W1992113607 @default.
• W1992113607 hasPrimaryLocation W19921136071 @default.
• W1992113607 hasRelatedWork W1799225360 @default.
• W1992113607 hasRelatedWork W1974174011 @default.
• W1992113607 hasRelatedWork W1982664809 @default.
• W1992113607 hasRelatedWork W2079358298 @default.
• W1992113607 hasRelatedWork W2087737319 @default.
• W1992113607 hasRelatedWork W2180987957 @default.
• W1992113607 hasRelatedWork W2337395616 @default.
• W1992113607 hasRelatedWork W2365513417 @default.
• W1992113607 hasRelatedWork W2378722262 @default.
• W1992113607 hasRelatedWork W3021577401 @default.
• W1992113607 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W1992113607 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1992113607 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1992113607 magId "1992113607" @default.
• W1992113607 workType "article" @default.