FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1992156789> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1992156789 endingPage "293" @default.
• W1992156789 startingPage "286" @default.
• W1992156789 abstract "Purpose: The aim of this study has been to survey adolescents' strategies to promote sexual encounters and to compare those used by males and females. We examined the predictions that sexual strategies of young adolescents are fewer and less adult-like and that those of male adolescents are more coercive. We also examined the predictions from evolutionary psychology that suggest in sexual strategies, males communicate emotional involvement, long-term interest, and resource investment, whereas females communicate sexual availability and fertility. Methods: The sample consisted of 153 African-American, white, Chinese-American, and Mexican-American adolescents. A strategy inventory was developed and mention of strategies by males and females were compared. Results: Significant gender differences in mention of strategies were found. Males mentioned a higher percentage of coercive strategies such as pressuring and raping as well as a higher percentage of strategies such as lying and getting a partner drunk or high. Males and females both mentioned a higher percentage of strategies communicating commitment and investment. Females mentioned more strategies which signaled sexual availability. Adolescent strategies were fewer than those reported by adults and less focused on appearance enhancement and the intricacies of dating. Conclusions: Findings suggest the need for special targeting of coercive situations, use of sexual strategies as a prompt for counterstrategies aimed at abstinence, use of sexual strategies as a context for condom use promotion, and reinforcement of female preparatory strategies. The aim of this study has been to survey adolescents' strategies to promote sexual encounters and to compare those used by males and females. We examined the predictions that sexual strategies of young adolescents are fewer and less adult-like and that those of male adolescents are more coercive. We also examined the predictions from evolutionary psychology that suggest in sexual strategies, males communicate emotional involvement, long-term interest, and resource investment, whereas females communicate sexual availability and fertility. The sample consisted of 153 African-American, white, Chinese-American, and Mexican-American adolescents. A strategy inventory was developed and mention of strategies by males and females were compared. Significant gender differences in mention of strategies were found. Males mentioned a higher percentage of coercive strategies such as pressuring and raping as well as a higher percentage of strategies such as lying and getting a partner drunk or high. Males and females both mentioned a higher percentage of strategies communicating commitment and investment. Females mentioned more strategies which signaled sexual availability. Adolescent strategies were fewer than those reported by adults and less focused on appearance enhancement and the intricacies of dating. Findings suggest the need for special targeting of coercive situations, use of sexual strategies as a prompt for counterstrategies aimed at abstinence, use of sexual strategies as a context for condom use promotion, and reinforcement of female preparatory strategies." @default.
• W1992156789 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1992156789 creator A5002875152 @default.
• W1992156789 creator A5010911599 @default.
• W1992156789 creator A5058489575 @default.
• W1992156789 date "1997-04-01" @default.
• W1992156789 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1992156789 title "Adolescent sexual strategies" @default.
• W1992156789 cites W1999805090 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W2007102844 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W2007772521 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W2013875192 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W2019928049 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W2020716095 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W2028359968 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W2029180337 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W2037225481 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W2040175867 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W2046372467 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W2048440533 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W2112720832 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W2139408435 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W2317466980 @default.
• W1992156789 cites W4206218961 @default.
• W1992156789 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1054-139x(96)00239-x" @default.
• W1992156789 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9098732" @default.
• W1992156789 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
• W1992156789 type Work @default.
• W1992156789 sameAs 1992156789 @default.
• W1992156789 citedByCount "30" @default.
• W1992156789 countsByYear W19921567892012 @default.
• W1992156789 countsByYear W19921567892014 @default.
• W1992156789 countsByYear W19921567892015 @default.
• W1992156789 countsByYear W19921567892016 @default.
• W1992156789 countsByYear W19921567892019 @default.
• W1992156789 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1992156789 hasAuthorship W1992156789A5002875152 @default.
• W1992156789 hasAuthorship W1992156789A5010911599 @default.
• W1992156789 hasAuthorship W1992156789A5058489575 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C2776983459 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C2779379456 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C2780687700 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C2993344476 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C3013748606 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C118552586 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C138496976 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C144024400 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C149923435 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C151730666 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C15744967 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C2776983459 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C2779343474 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C2779379456 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C2780687700 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C2993344476 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C3013748606 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C512399662 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C70410870 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C71924100 @default.
• W1992156789 hasConceptScore W1992156789C86803240 @default.
• W1992156789 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1992156789 hasLocation W19921567891 @default.
• W1992156789 hasLocation W19921567892 @default.
• W1992156789 hasOpenAccess W1992156789 @default.
• W1992156789 hasPrimaryLocation W19921567891 @default.
• W1992156789 hasRelatedWork W2055080033 @default.
• W1992156789 hasRelatedWork W2064657991 @default.
• W1992156789 hasRelatedWork W2139974096 @default.
• W1992156789 hasRelatedWork W2210273361 @default.
• W1992156789 hasRelatedWork W2267918442 @default.
• W1992156789 hasRelatedWork W2348261133 @default.
• W1992156789 hasRelatedWork W2370356792 @default.
• W1992156789 hasRelatedWork W2390800521 @default.
• W1992156789 hasRelatedWork W2396653718 @default.
• W1992156789 hasRelatedWork W2408863187 @default.
• W1992156789 hasVolume "20" @default.
• W1992156789 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1992156789 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1992156789 magId "1992156789" @default.
• W1992156789 workType "article" @default.