FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1992471920> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1992471920 endingPage "980" @default.
• W1992471920 startingPage "974" @default.
• W1992471920 abstract "Purpose: To analyze the extent and time course of prostate edema and its effect on dosimetry after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy. Methods and Materials: Twenty patients scheduled for permanent seed 125I prostate brachytherapy agreed to a prospective study on postimplant edema. Implants were preplanned using transrectal ultrasonography. Postimplant dosimetry was calculated using computed tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (CT-MRI) fusion on the day of the implant (Day 1) and Days 8 and 30. The prostate was contoured on MRI, and the seeds were located on CT. Factors investigated for an influence on edema were the number of seeds and needles, preimplant prostate volume, transitional zone index (transition zone volume divided by prostate volume), age, and prostate-specific antigen level. Prostate dosimetry was evaluated by the percentage of the prostate volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (V100) and percentage of prescribed dose received by 90% of the prostate volume (D90). Results: Prostate edema was maximal on Day 1, with the median prostate volume 31% greater than preimplant transrectal ultrasound volume (range, 0.93–1.72; p < 0.001) and decreased with time. It was 21% greater than baseline at Day 8 (p = 0.013) and 5% greater on Day 30 (p < 0.001). Three patients still had a prostate volume greater than baseline by Day 30. The extent of edema depended on the transition zone volume (p = 0.016) and the preplan prostate volume (p = 0.003). The median V100 on Day 1 was 93.6% (range, 86.0–98.2%) and was 96.3% (range, 85.7–99.5%) on Day 30 (p = 0.079). Patients with a Day 1 V100 >93% were less affected by edema resolution, showing a median increase in V100 of 0.67% on Day 30 compared with 2.77% for patients with a V100 <93 % on Day 1. Conclusion: Despite the extreme range of postimplant edema, the effect on dosimetry was less than expected. Dose coverage of the prostate was good for all patients during Days 1–30. Our data indicate that postimplant dosimetry on the day of implant is sufficient for patients with good dose coverage (Day 1 V100 >93%). Purpose: To analyze the extent and time course of prostate edema and its effect on dosimetry after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy. Methods and Materials: Twenty patients scheduled for permanent seed 125I prostate brachytherapy agreed to a prospective study on postimplant edema. Implants were preplanned using transrectal ultrasonography. Postimplant dosimetry was calculated using computed tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (CT-MRI) fusion on the day of the implant (Day 1) and Days 8 and 30. The prostate was contoured on MRI, and the seeds were located on CT. Factors investigated for an influence on edema were the number of seeds and needles, preimplant prostate volume, transitional zone index (transition zone volume divided by prostate volume), age, and prostate-specific antigen level. Prostate dosimetry was evaluated by the percentage of the prostate volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (V100) and percentage of prescribed dose received by 90% of the prostate volume (D90). Results: Prostate edema was maximal on Day 1, with the median prostate volume 31% greater than preimplant transrectal ultrasound volume (range, 0.93–1.72; p < 0.001) and decreased with time. It was 21% greater than baseline at Day 8 (p = 0.013) and 5% greater on Day 30 (p < 0.001). Three patients still had a prostate volume greater than baseline by Day 30. The extent of edema depended on the transition zone volume (p = 0.016) and the preplan prostate volume (p = 0.003). The median V100 on Day 1 was 93.6% (range, 86.0–98.2%) and was 96.3% (range, 85.7–99.5%) on Day 30 (p = 0.079). Patients with a Day 1 V100 >93% were less affected by edema resolution, showing a median increase in V100 of 0.67% on Day 30 compared with 2.77% for patients with a V100 <93 % on Day 1. Conclusion: Despite the extreme range of postimplant edema, the effect on dosimetry was less than expected. Dose coverage of the prostate was good for all patients during Days 1–30. Our data indicate that postimplant dosimetry on the day of implant is sufficient for patients with good dose coverage (Day 1 V100 >93%)." @default.
• W1992471920 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1992471920 creator A5021967618 @default.
• W1992471920 creator A5028169952 @default.
• W1992471920 creator A5030117432 @default.
• W1992471920 creator A5031218176 @default.
• W1992471920 creator A5047689900 @default.
• W1992471920 creator A5062816009 @default.
• W1992471920 creator A5064363717 @default.
• W1992471920 creator A5071524591 @default.
• W1992471920 creator A5086575366 @default.
• W1992471920 date "2005-07-01" @default.
• W1992471920 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1992471920 title "Sequential evaluation of prostate edema after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy using CT-MRI fusion" @default.
• W1992471920 cites W1980422036 @default.
• W1992471920 cites W1989652485 @default.
• W1992471920 cites W1991480813 @default.
• W1992471920 cites W2018408093 @default.
• W1992471920 cites W2023104730 @default.
• W1992471920 cites W2026619552 @default.
• W1992471920 cites W2056899437 @default.
• W1992471920 cites W2057282805 @default.
• W1992471920 cites W2081501463 @default.
• W1992471920 cites W2122530789 @default.
• W1992471920 cites W2139928071 @default.
• W1992471920 cites W2158798379 @default.
• W1992471920 cites W2160817777 @default.
• W1992471920 cites W2166124572 @default.
• W1992471920 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.012" @default.
• W1992471920 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15989997" @default.
• W1992471920 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W1992471920 type Work @default.
• W1992471920 sameAs 1992471920 @default.
• W1992471920 citedByCount "93" @default.
• W1992471920 countsByYear W19924719202012 @default.
• W1992471920 countsByYear W19924719202013 @default.
• W1992471920 countsByYear W19924719202014 @default.
• W1992471920 countsByYear W19924719202015 @default.
• W1992471920 countsByYear W19924719202016 @default.
• W1992471920 countsByYear W19924719202017 @default.
• W1992471920 countsByYear W19924719202018 @default.
• W1992471920 countsByYear W19924719202019 @default.
• W1992471920 countsByYear W19924719202020 @default.
• W1992471920 countsByYear W19924719202021 @default.
• W1992471920 countsByYear W19924719202022 @default.
• W1992471920 countsByYear W19924719202023 @default.
• W1992471920 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1992471920 hasAuthorship W1992471920A5021967618 @default.
• W1992471920 hasAuthorship W1992471920A5028169952 @default.
• W1992471920 hasAuthorship W1992471920A5030117432 @default.
• W1992471920 hasAuthorship W1992471920A5031218176 @default.
• W1992471920 hasAuthorship W1992471920A5047689900 @default.
• W1992471920 hasAuthorship W1992471920A5062816009 @default.
• W1992471920 hasAuthorship W1992471920A5064363717 @default.
• W1992471920 hasAuthorship W1992471920A5071524591 @default.
• W1992471920 hasAuthorship W1992471920A5086575366 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C2777416452 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C2778648096 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C2780886150 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C121608353 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C126322002 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C126838900 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C126894567 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C141071460 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C143409427 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C2776235491 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C2777416452 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C2778648096 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C2780192828 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C2780886150 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C2989005 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C509974204 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C71924100 @default.
• W1992471920 hasConceptScore W1992471920C75088862 @default.
• W1992471920 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1992471920 hasLocation W19924719201 @default.
• W1992471920 hasLocation W19924719202 @default.
• W1992471920 hasOpenAccess W1992471920 @default.
• W1992471920 hasPrimaryLocation W19924719201 @default.
• W1992471920 hasRelatedWork W1994180560 @default.
• W1992471920 hasRelatedWork W2027294118 @default.
• W1992471920 hasRelatedWork W2039692113 @default.
• W1992471920 hasRelatedWork W2043099192 @default.
• W1992471920 hasRelatedWork W2054331952 @default.
• W1992471920 hasRelatedWork W2094494178 @default.
• W1992471920 hasRelatedWork W2139928071 @default.

• next