Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1992804567> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 82 of
82
with 100 items per page.
- W1992804567 endingPage "1093" @default.
- W1992804567 startingPage "1089" @default.
- W1992804567 abstract "No AccessJournal of UrologyStones/Ureteroceles1 Sep 2000TREATMENT OF DISTAL URETERAL STONES IN CHILDREN: SIMILARITIES TO THE AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES IN ADULTS John G. Van Savage, Lucio G. Palanca, Robert D. Andersen, Ganesh S. Rao, and Bruce L. Slaughenhoupt John G. Van SavageJohn G. Van Savage More articles by this author , Lucio G. PalancaLucio G. Palanca More articles by this author , Robert D. AndersenRobert D. Andersen More articles by this author , Ganesh S. RaoGanesh S. Rao More articles by this author , and Bruce L. SlaughenhouptBruce L. Slaughenhoupt More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67259-XAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: The American Urological Association (AUA) published clinical guidelines for the treatment of ureteral calculi in adults and note that up to 98% of stones less than 5 mm. in diameter will pass spontaneously. Ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy were acceptable treatment choices for stones less than 10 mm. in diameter in the distal ureter. We reviewed our management of distal ureteral stones in children to see if the AUA Guidelines for adults would apply. Materials and Methods: A total of 14 males and 19 females with a mean age of 12 years (range 0.5 to 17) required hospitalization in the last 6 years for distal ureteral obstruction due to stones. Excretory urography or computerized tomography was performed in all cases, and mean stone size was 4 mm. (range 1 to 15). When stones did not pass spontaneously most patients were treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. Results: There were 12 (36%) with a mean age of 11 years and a mean stone size of 2 mm. (range 1 to 3) who passed stones spontaneously with intravenous hydration and narcotics. No child passed a stone 4 mm. or greater spontaneously in this series. Of 21 patients (64%) with a mean age of 12 years and a mean stone size of 5 mm. (range 1 to 15) 2 were treated with ureteral stents, 17 with ureteroscopic lithotripsy and 2 with shock wave lithotripsy. All patients were stone-free at the end of the procedures. The stone composition was predominantly calcium oxalate. Mean followup was 2 years. Conclusions: Similar to the AUA guidelines in adults, most stones less than 3 mm. in diameter in the distal ureter of children will pass spontaneously. Stones 4 mm or greater in the distal ureter are likely to require endosurgical treatment. Ureteroscopy and shock wave lithrotripsy have a high success rate for stones between 4 and 15 mm. in the distal ureter. Needle ureteroscope and laser lithotripsy have allowed more stones to be treated safely and effectively in smaller children. References 1 : Pediatric urolithiasis: medical and surgical management. Urology1996; 47: 292. Google Scholar 2 : Pediatric urolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am1997; 24: 173. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 3 : Treatment of pediatric urolithiasis between 1984 and 1994. J Urol1996; 156: 702. Link, Google Scholar 4 : Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association. J Urol1997; 158: 1915. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Pediatric urolithiasis in the 1970s. J Urol1980; 123: 237. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Pediatric ureteroscopy for ureteric calculi: a 4-year experience. Br J Urol1997; 80: 797. Google Scholar 7 : Ureteroscopy in children. J Urol1990; 144: 481. Link, Google Scholar 8 : Pediatric ureteroscopy: technique and preliminary results. J Pediatr Surg1997; 32: 571. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 9 : A case of pediatric ureteroscopic lasertripsy. J Urol1988; 139: 1272. Link, Google Scholar 10 : Ureterolithotripsy in children. Urology1995; 46: 859. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 11 : Experience with ureteroscopy in children. Br J Urol1995; 75: 395. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 12 : Safety and efficacy of pediatric ureteroscopy for management of calculous disease. J Urol1993; 149: 1082. Link, Google Scholar 13 : First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol1982; 127: 417. Link, Google Scholar 14 : In situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for the management of primary ureteric calculi in children. J Pediatr Surg1994; 29: 1315. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 15 : Pediatric low energy lithotripsy with the Lithostar. J Urol1995; 153: 453. Link, Google Scholar 16 : Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy experience in children. J Urol1986; 136: 238. Link, Google Scholar 17 : Percutaneous trochar (needle) nephrostomy and hydronephrosis. JAMA1955; 157: 891. Google Scholar 18 : Kidney stones. Lancet1998; 351: 1797. Google Scholar 19 : Childhood urolithiasis in Britain. Arch Dis Child1973; 48: 291. Google Scholar 20 : Urinary lithiasis: etiology, diagnosis, and medical management. In: . Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.1998: 2661. chapt. 91. Google Scholar 21 : Urinary tract calculi. In: . New York: Churchill Livingstone1993: 249. Google Scholar From the Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky© 2000 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byPenido M, Srivastava T and Alon U (2012) Pediatric Primary Urolithiasis: 12-Year Experience at a Midwestern Children's HospitalJournal of Urology, VOL. 189, NO. 4, (1493-1497), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013.Dogan H, Onal B, Satar N, Aygun C, Piskin M, Tanriverdi O, Gurocak S, Gunay L, Burgu B, Ozden E, Nazli O, Erdem E, Yucel S, Kefi A, Demirci D, Uluocak N, Aridogan I, Turunc T, Yalcin V, Kilinc M, Horasanli K, Tan M, Soygur T, Sarikaya S, Kilicarslan H, Turna B, Doruk H and Tekgul S (2011) Factors Affecting Complication Rates of Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in Children: Results of Multi-Institutional Retrospective Analysis by Pediatric Stone Disease Study Group of Turkish Pediatric Urology SocietyJournal of Urology, VOL. 186, NO. 3, (1035-1040), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2011.Kalorin C, Zabinski A, Okpareke I, White M and Kogan B (2009) Pediatric Urinary Stone Disease—Does Age Matter?Journal of Urology, VOL. 181, NO. 5, (2267-2271), Online publication date: 1-May-2009.Preminger G, Tiselius H, Assimos D, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Lingeman J, Nakada S, Pearle M, Sarica K, Türk C and Wolf J (2018) 2007 Guideline for the Management of Ureteral CalculiJournal of Urology, VOL. 178, NO. 6, (2418-2434), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2007.Singh A, Shah G, Young J, Sheridan M, Haas G and Upadhyay J (2018) Ureteral Access Sheath for the Management of Pediatric Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Single Center ExperienceJournal of Urology, VOL. 175, NO. 3, (1080-1082), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2006.STERNBERG K, GREENFIELD S, WILLIOT P and WAN J (2018) PEDIATRIC STONE DISEASE: AN EVOLVING EXPERIENCEJournal of Urology, VOL. 174, NO. 4 Part 2, (1711-1714), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2005.THOMAS J, DeMARCO R, DONOHOE J, ADAMS M, BROCK J and POPE J (2018) PEDIATRIC URETEROSCOPIC STONE MANAGEMENTJournal of Urology, VOL. 174, NO. 3, (1072-1074), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2005.MINEVICH E, DeFOOR W, REDDY P, NISHINAKA K, WACKSMAN J, SHELDON C and ERHARD M (2018) URETEROSCOPY IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE IN PREPUBERTAL CHILDRENJournal of Urology, VOL. 174, NO. 1, (276-279), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2005.CASALE P, GRADY R, JOYNER B, ZELTSER I, KUO R and MITCHELL M (2018) TRANSPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOLITHOTOMY AFTER FAILED PERCUTANEOUS ACCESS IN THE PEDIATRIC PATIENTJournal of Urology, VOL. 172, NO. 2, (680-683), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2004.MUSLUMANOGLU A, TEFEKLI A, SARILAR O, BINBAY M, ALTUNRENDE F and OZKUVANCI U (2018) Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy as First Line Treatment Alternative for Urinary Tract Stones in Children: A Large Scale Retrospective AnalysisJournal of Urology, VOL. 170, NO. 6, (2405-2408), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2003.Schuster T, Russell K, Bloom D, Koo H and Faerber G (2018) Ureteroscopy For The Treatment Of Urolithiasis In ChildrenJournal of Urology, VOL. 167, NO. 4, (1813-1816), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2002.PIETROW P, POPE J, ADAMS M, SHYR Y and BROCK J (2018) CLINICAL OUTCOME OF PEDIATRIC STONE DISEASEJournal of Urology, VOL. 167, NO. 2 Part 1, (670-673), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2002. Volume 164Issue 3 Part 2September 2000Page: 1089-1093 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2000 by American Urological Association, Inc.Keywordsureteroscopyureterchildlithotripsyurinary calculiMetricsAuthor Information John G. Van Savage More articles by this author Lucio G. Palanca More articles by this author Robert D. Andersen More articles by this author Ganesh S. Rao More articles by this author Bruce L. Slaughenhoupt More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
- W1992804567 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1992804567 creator A5019199339 @default.
- W1992804567 creator A5026295350 @default.
- W1992804567 creator A5067481426 @default.
- W1992804567 creator A5085008352 @default.
- W1992804567 creator A5085137135 @default.
- W1992804567 date "2000-09-01" @default.
- W1992804567 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W1992804567 title "TREATMENT OF DISTAL URETERAL STONES IN CHILDREN: SIMILARITIES TO THE AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES IN ADULTS" @default.
- W1992804567 cites W1982990767 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W1983484644 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W1996964066 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W2000198967 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W2012529271 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W2019196777 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W2020487915 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W2033362556 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W2093750107 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W2101683465 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W2163429979 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W2402635335 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W2418445361 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W2419670492 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W2427986152 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W324412077 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W4243978401 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W4247020019 @default.
- W1992804567 cites W4252975077 @default.
- W1992804567 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67259-x" @default.
- W1992804567 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10958749" @default.
- W1992804567 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
- W1992804567 type Work @default.
- W1992804567 sameAs 1992804567 @default.
- W1992804567 citedByCount "106" @default.
- W1992804567 countsByYear W19928045672012 @default.
- W1992804567 countsByYear W19928045672013 @default.
- W1992804567 countsByYear W19928045672014 @default.
- W1992804567 countsByYear W19928045672015 @default.
- W1992804567 countsByYear W19928045672017 @default.
- W1992804567 countsByYear W19928045672018 @default.
- W1992804567 countsByYear W19928045672019 @default.
- W1992804567 countsByYear W19928045672020 @default.
- W1992804567 countsByYear W19928045672022 @default.
- W1992804567 countsByYear W19928045672023 @default.
- W1992804567 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1992804567 hasAuthorship W1992804567A5019199339 @default.
- W1992804567 hasAuthorship W1992804567A5026295350 @default.
- W1992804567 hasAuthorship W1992804567A5067481426 @default.
- W1992804567 hasAuthorship W1992804567A5085008352 @default.
- W1992804567 hasAuthorship W1992804567A5085137135 @default.
- W1992804567 hasConcept C142853389 @default.
- W1992804567 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W1992804567 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
- W1992804567 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W1992804567 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1992804567 hasConceptScore W1992804567C142853389 @default.
- W1992804567 hasConceptScore W1992804567C15744967 @default.
- W1992804567 hasConceptScore W1992804567C542102704 @default.
- W1992804567 hasConceptScore W1992804567C61434518 @default.
- W1992804567 hasConceptScore W1992804567C71924100 @default.
- W1992804567 hasIssue "3 Part 2" @default.
- W1992804567 hasLocation W19928045671 @default.
- W1992804567 hasOpenAccess W1992804567 @default.
- W1992804567 hasPrimaryLocation W19928045671 @default.
- W1992804567 hasRelatedWork W1946354434 @default.
- W1992804567 hasRelatedWork W2016374247 @default.
- W1992804567 hasRelatedWork W2019250753 @default.
- W1992804567 hasRelatedWork W2102644969 @default.
- W1992804567 hasRelatedWork W2370073206 @default.
- W1992804567 hasRelatedWork W2922159997 @default.
- W1992804567 hasRelatedWork W2967287585 @default.
- W1992804567 hasRelatedWork W3208701539 @default.
- W1992804567 hasRelatedWork W4313346385 @default.
- W1992804567 hasRelatedWork W4317816533 @default.
- W1992804567 hasVolume "164" @default.
- W1992804567 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1992804567 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1992804567 magId "1992804567" @default.
- W1992804567 workType "article" @default.