FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1992852102> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1992852102 endingPage "1054" @default.
• W1992852102 startingPage "1046" @default.
• W1992852102 abstract "Background Laparoscopic liver surgery is expanding. Most laparoscopic liver resections for colorectal carcinoma metastases are performed subsequent to the resection of the colorectal primary, raising concerns about the feasibility and safety of advanced laparoscopic liver surgery in the context of an abdomen with possible postoperative adhesions. The aim was to compare the outcome of laparoscopic hepatectomy for colorectal metastases after open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Methods This observational, multicenter study reviewed 394 patients undergoing laparoscopic minor and major liver resection for colorectal carcinoma metastases. Main outcome measures were intraoperative unfavorable incidents and short-term results in patients who had previous open versus laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Results Three hundred six patients (78%) had prior open and 88 (22%) had prior laparoscopic colorectal resection. Laparoscopic major hepatectomies were undertaken in 63 (16%). Intraoperative unfavorable incidents during laparoscopic liver surgery were significantly higher among patients who had prior open colorectal surgery (26%) compared with the laparoscopic group (14%; P = .017). Positive resection margins and postoperative complications were not associated with the approach adopted for the resection of the primary cancer. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, intraoperative unfavorable incidents were associated significantly only with prior open colorectal surgery (odds ratio, 2.8; P = .006) and laparoscopic major hepatectomy (odds ratio, 2.4; P = .009). Conclusion Laparoscopic minor hepatectomy can be performed safely in patients who have undergone previous open colorectal surgery. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy after open colorectal surgery may be challenging. Careful risk assessment in the decision-making process is required not to compromise patient safety and to guarantee the expected benefits from the minimally invasive approach. Laparoscopic liver surgery is expanding. Most laparoscopic liver resections for colorectal carcinoma metastases are performed subsequent to the resection of the colorectal primary, raising concerns about the feasibility and safety of advanced laparoscopic liver surgery in the context of an abdomen with possible postoperative adhesions. The aim was to compare the outcome of laparoscopic hepatectomy for colorectal metastases after open versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery. This observational, multicenter study reviewed 394 patients undergoing laparoscopic minor and major liver resection for colorectal carcinoma metastases. Main outcome measures were intraoperative unfavorable incidents and short-term results in patients who had previous open versus laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Three hundred six patients (78%) had prior open and 88 (22%) had prior laparoscopic colorectal resection. Laparoscopic major hepatectomies were undertaken in 63 (16%). Intraoperative unfavorable incidents during laparoscopic liver surgery were significantly higher among patients who had prior open colorectal surgery (26%) compared with the laparoscopic group (14%; P = .017). Positive resection margins and postoperative complications were not associated with the approach adopted for the resection of the primary cancer. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, intraoperative unfavorable incidents were associated significantly only with prior open colorectal surgery (odds ratio, 2.8; P = .006) and laparoscopic major hepatectomy (odds ratio, 2.4; P = .009). Laparoscopic minor hepatectomy can be performed safely in patients who have undergone previous open colorectal surgery. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy after open colorectal surgery may be challenging. Careful risk assessment in the decision-making process is required not to compromise patient safety and to guarantee the expected benefits from the minimally invasive approach." @default.
• W1992852102 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1992852102 creator A5003734851 @default.
• W1992852102 creator A5013484531 @default.
• W1992852102 creator A5026155175 @default.
• W1992852102 creator A5041843585 @default.
• W1992852102 creator A5045208621 @default.
• W1992852102 creator A5050842751 @default.
• W1992852102 creator A5066127019 @default.
• W1992852102 creator A5079365890 @default.
• W1992852102 creator A5088558288 @default.
• W1992852102 date "2015-06-01" @default.
• W1992852102 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1992852102 title "The impact of laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery on subsequent laparoscopic resection of liver metastases: A multicenter study" @default.
• W1992852102 cites W1484985157 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W1496510983 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W1596761572 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W1965903090 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W1967591571 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W1984957561 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W1986042302 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W1995686707 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W1998407475 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W1999381305 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2008253420 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2011890969 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2017019986 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2022162025 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2026053886 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2043313810 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2048970832 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2049141327 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2049294196 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2054230374 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2062699660 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2063685444 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2065069705 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2092679286 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2092746588 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2094258078 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2096998881 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2137555888 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2146182990 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W2333117808 @default.
• W1992852102 cites W4232042311 @default.
• W1992852102 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.01.007" @default.
• W1992852102 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25835216" @default.
• W1992852102 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1992852102 type Work @default.
• W1992852102 sameAs 1992852102 @default.
• W1992852102 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W1992852102 countsByYear W19928521022015 @default.
• W1992852102 countsByYear W19928521022016 @default.
• W1992852102 countsByYear W19928521022017 @default.
• W1992852102 countsByYear W19928521022018 @default.
• W1992852102 countsByYear W19928521022019 @default.
• W1992852102 countsByYear W19928521022020 @default.
• W1992852102 countsByYear W19928521022021 @default.
• W1992852102 countsByYear W19928521022022 @default.
• W1992852102 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1992852102 hasAuthorship W1992852102A5003734851 @default.
• W1992852102 hasAuthorship W1992852102A5013484531 @default.
• W1992852102 hasAuthorship W1992852102A5026155175 @default.
• W1992852102 hasAuthorship W1992852102A5041843585 @default.
• W1992852102 hasAuthorship W1992852102A5045208621 @default.
• W1992852102 hasAuthorship W1992852102A5050842751 @default.
• W1992852102 hasAuthorship W1992852102A5066127019 @default.
• W1992852102 hasAuthorship W1992852102A5079365890 @default.
• W1992852102 hasAuthorship W1992852102A5088558288 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConcept C159110652 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConcept C2776909242 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConcept C523026621 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConceptScore W1992852102C121608353 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConceptScore W1992852102C126322002 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConceptScore W1992852102C141071460 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConceptScore W1992852102C156957248 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConceptScore W1992852102C159110652 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConceptScore W1992852102C2776111594 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConceptScore W1992852102C2776909242 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConceptScore W1992852102C2780047204 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConceptScore W1992852102C2780120127 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConceptScore W1992852102C523026621 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConceptScore W1992852102C526805850 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConceptScore W1992852102C61434518 @default.
• W1992852102 hasConceptScore W1992852102C71924100 @default.
• W1992852102 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W1992852102 hasLocation W19928521021 @default.
• W1992852102 hasLocation W19928521022 @default.

• next