FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1992934990> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1992934990 endingPage "1" @default.
• W1992934990 startingPage "1" @default.
• W1992934990 abstract "CO2 lasers have become an important technological advance and an integral tool for the laryngeal surgeon since the 1960s. Surgeons have used lasers for a variety of benign and malignant lesions in the larynx with good success. With better understanding of the microarchitecture of the vocal folds and the recognition of heat distribution into surrounding tissues that occurs with the use of standard CO2 lasers, questions and concerns have been raised regarding the use of the CO2 laser for benign lesions of the vocal folds. With the advent of the microspot CO2 laser with a spot size of less than 250 microm, the potential heat distribution to the deeper layers of the lamina propria has been reduced. The microspot CO2 laser has been suggested to be an appropriate tool for the excision of superficial benign lesions of the vocal fold and may be considered as an appropriate treatment alternative to microdissection. Only a limited number of studies have compared the efficacy of microdissection versus microspot CO2 laser surgery in the larynx, and no prospective, randomized trials have been performed.This study was designed to compare microspot CO2 laser excision and microdissection for superficial benign lesions confined to the free margin of the vocal fold.A randomized, prospective trial comparing microspot CO2 laser excision and microdissection in the removal of nodules, polyps, and mucous retention cysts of the vocal fold.Acoustic and aerodynamic measures and videostroboscopic and perceptual audio recordings evaluated by a panel of blinded viewers and listeners were studied preoperatively and 2 to 3 weeks and 5 to 12 weeks postoperatively. Surgical and recovery times were compared between the two groups.Thirty-seven patients met selection criteria and were enrolled, 21 in the microdissection group and 16 in the laser excision group. Significant improvements in videostroboscopic parameters were found over time in both groups. Significant improvements were noted for perceptual analysis over time for the laser excision group with nonsignificant improvements over time for the microdissection group. There was no difference in any measure between laser excision and microdissection at the two postoperative visits. There was no difference in surgical or recovery time between laser excision and microdissection. Acoustic and aerodynamic parameters were noncontributory in evaluating outcomes of treatment, since most values were normal before surgery.No differences in clinical outcomes are identified when comparing microdissection with laser excision of nodules, polyps, and mucous retention cysts of the vocal folds." @default.
• W1992934990 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1992934990 creator A5086953145 @default.
• W1992934990 date "2000-02-01" @default.
• W1992934990 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W1992934990 title "Microdissection or Microspot CO₂Laser for Limited Vocal Fold Benign Lesions: A Prospective Randomized Trial" @default.
• W1992934990 cites W106222999 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W153805815 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W1788350600 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W1965399752 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W1969260488 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W1969606550 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W1998207473 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2009109421 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2013664463 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2016438499 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2018692972 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2022593831 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2024650800 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2025058112 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2030038103 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2036066755 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2042650216 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2053351753 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2061360249 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2061521209 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2069832986 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2076182465 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2078020060 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2078543116 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2082454357 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2083617898 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2085467393 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2085519837 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2087784262 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2092821159 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2123732302 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2131372483 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2137733895 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2147691034 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2153896592 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2156284724 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2158831156 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2314775665 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2321796746 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2333904443 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2396221785 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2402080667 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2410832637 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2412402058 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2427197483 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2474288439 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2483615743 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2945587955 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W2973515423 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W36392875 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W37183776 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W4292806894 @default.
• W1992934990 cites W586855345 @default.
• W1992934990 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200002001-00001" @default.
• W1992934990 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10678578" @default.
• W1992934990 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W1992934990 type Work @default.
• W1992934990 sameAs 1992934990 @default.
• W1992934990 citedByCount "90" @default.
• W1992934990 countsByYear W19929349902012 @default.
• W1992934990 countsByYear W19929349902013 @default.
• W1992934990 countsByYear W19929349902014 @default.
• W1992934990 countsByYear W19929349902015 @default.
• W1992934990 countsByYear W19929349902016 @default.
• W1992934990 countsByYear W19929349902017 @default.
• W1992934990 countsByYear W19929349902018 @default.
• W1992934990 countsByYear W19929349902019 @default.
• W1992934990 countsByYear W19929349902020 @default.
• W1992934990 countsByYear W19929349902021 @default.
• W1992934990 countsByYear W19929349902022 @default.
• W1992934990 countsByYear W19929349902023 @default.
• W1992934990 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1992934990 hasAuthorship W1992934990A5086953145 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C11242284 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C125965507 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C150194340 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C2776888792 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C2776957994 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C2780336059 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C2780474809 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C2910049883 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConceptScore W1992934990C104317684 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConceptScore W1992934990C11242284 @default.
• W1992934990 hasConceptScore W1992934990C125965507 @default.

• next