FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1992968606> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1992968606 endingPage "629" @default.
• W1992968606 startingPage "626" @default.
• W1992968606 abstract "There are definable risk-benefit ratios in every surgical procedure, and assessment of a patient's risk-benefit is a particularly important and complex responsibility of the aesthetic surgeon. If someone seeks an aesthetic operation and the surgeon carefully determines that everything about the patient's circumstances warrants the procedure and that the patient is properly motivated and understands the risks, a positive risk/benefit ratio then exists. There is a high probability that the end result will be successful. On the other hand, if the surgeon determines that the patient does not meet either the physical or psychological criteria for the procedure, or if there is simply a “gut feeling” that says, “No,” then the safest course is to decline treatment. If the physician proceeds with surgery regardless of indications to the contrary, no matter the quality of the final result in the surgeon's eyes, the situation is likely to produce an unhappy, troublesome patient.1There is little disagreement between aesthetic surgeons and mental health professionals that patients who exhibit even mild signs of a variety of psychiatric disorders are dubious candidates for aesthetic surgery. Unfortunately, most of those patients appear in the consultation suite in various “shades of gray” without labels on their lapels. Many surgeons, after their arduous climb to clinical excellence, tend to be focused more intensely on maintaining their surgical skills and knowledge than on the variable human equations that motivate their patients. Thus they often fail to distinguish between those who will be ecstatic over their surgical results and those who will prove to be unhappy regardless of the excellence of the improvement, a dilemma that can lead to serious consequences for the surgeon.Aesthetic surgeons expose themselves to risks that no other practicing physician assumes. They are not treating sick or injured patients to make them well, …" @default.
• W1992968606 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1992968606 creator A5014896682 @default.
• W1992968606 date "2007-11-01" @default.
• W1992968606 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1992968606 title "Recognition of the patient unsuitable for aesthetic surgery" @default.
• W1992968606 cites W1534627317 @default.
• W1992968606 cites W1967840805 @default.
• W1992968606 cites W1973104676 @default.
• W1992968606 cites W1985738821 @default.
• W1992968606 cites W1994906964 @default.
• W1992968606 cites W2017839347 @default.
• W1992968606 cites W2029194785 @default.
• W1992968606 cites W2058810427 @default.
• W1992968606 cites W2068753642 @default.
• W1992968606 cites W2077068783 @default.
• W1992968606 cites W2398249498 @default.
• W1992968606 cites W2409363552 @default.
• W1992968606 cites W2462455196 @default.
• W1992968606 cites W2966516683 @default.
• W1992968606 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2007.09.004" @default.
• W1992968606 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19341694" @default.
• W1992968606 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W1992968606 type Work @default.
• W1992968606 sameAs 1992968606 @default.
• W1992968606 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W1992968606 countsByYear W19929686062013 @default.
• W1992968606 countsByYear W19929686062014 @default.
• W1992968606 countsByYear W19929686062016 @default.
• W1992968606 countsByYear W19929686062019 @default.
• W1992968606 countsByYear W19929686062021 @default.
• W1992968606 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1992968606 hasAuthorship W1992968606A5014896682 @default.
• W1992968606 hasBestOaLocation W19929686061 @default.
• W1992968606 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1992968606 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1992968606 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1992968606 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W1992968606 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W1992968606 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1992968606 hasConceptScore W1992968606C141071460 @default.
• W1992968606 hasConceptScore W1992968606C17744445 @default.
• W1992968606 hasConceptScore W1992968606C199539241 @default.
• W1992968606 hasConceptScore W1992968606C2779473830 @default.
• W1992968606 hasConceptScore W1992968606C61434518 @default.
• W1992968606 hasConceptScore W1992968606C71924100 @default.
• W1992968606 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W1992968606 hasLocation W19929686061 @default.
• W1992968606 hasLocation W19929686062 @default.
• W1992968606 hasOpenAccess W1992968606 @default.
• W1992968606 hasPrimaryLocation W19929686061 @default.
• W1992968606 hasRelatedWork W1586374228 @default.
• W1992968606 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W1992968606 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W1992968606 hasRelatedWork W2089201504 @default.
• W1992968606 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W1992968606 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W1992968606 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W1992968606 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W1992968606 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W1992968606 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W1992968606 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W1992968606 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1992968606 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1992968606 magId "1992968606" @default.
• W1992968606 workType "article" @default.