FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1992986543> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1992986543 endingPage "622" @default.
• W1992986543 startingPage "616" @default.
• W1992986543 abstract "Aim To assess the accuracy of provisional reporting and the impact on patient management. Materials and methods Over a 6 month period, 137 polytrauma computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed by on-call registrar radiologists at our institution. After exclusions, 130 cases were analysed. Discrepancies between registrar and consultant reports were reviewed and classified as either major or minor dependent on potential impact on patient safety. The relationship between seniority of reporting registrar and likelihood of a missed finding was analysed using the Chi-square test. Results Of the 130 patients, 46 (35%) had a serious injury, 36 (28%) a minor injury, and 48 (38%) no identifiable injury on CT. There were 32 (25%) patients with discrepancies of which 24 (18%) had missed or significantly under-reported findings and eight (6%) overcalled findings. There were six misses classified as major; the remaining 18 were classified as minor. No association was found between the seniority of reporting registrar and the likelihood of a miss (p=0.96). Conclusion The incidence of major discrepancies between the provisional and final report was low and did not lead to any significant clinical deterioration. Our study provides a reference of the commonly missed injuries. We conclude that registrar provisional reporting of polytrauma is safe; however, note that a large proportion of examinations are normal and that further work is required to produce robust criteria given the radiation risk to a young population group scanned in trauma. To assess the accuracy of provisional reporting and the impact on patient management. Over a 6 month period, 137 polytrauma computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed by on-call registrar radiologists at our institution. After exclusions, 130 cases were analysed. Discrepancies between registrar and consultant reports were reviewed and classified as either major or minor dependent on potential impact on patient safety. The relationship between seniority of reporting registrar and likelihood of a missed finding was analysed using the Chi-square test. Of the 130 patients, 46 (35%) had a serious injury, 36 (28%) a minor injury, and 48 (38%) no identifiable injury on CT. There were 32 (25%) patients with discrepancies of which 24 (18%) had missed or significantly under-reported findings and eight (6%) overcalled findings. There were six misses classified as major; the remaining 18 were classified as minor. No association was found between the seniority of reporting registrar and the likelihood of a miss (p=0.96). The incidence of major discrepancies between the provisional and final report was low and did not lead to any significant clinical deterioration. Our study provides a reference of the commonly missed injuries. We conclude that registrar provisional reporting of polytrauma is safe; however, note that a large proportion of examinations are normal and that further work is required to produce robust criteria given the radiation risk to a young population group scanned in trauma." @default.
• W1992986543 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1992986543 creator A5007721880 @default.
• W1992986543 creator A5036699921 @default.
• W1992986543 creator A5040662498 @default.
• W1992986543 creator A5085218962 @default.
• W1992986543 date "2010-08-01" @default.
• W1992986543 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W1992986543 title "Provisional reporting of polytrauma CT by on-call radiology registrars. Is it Safe?" @default.
• W1992986543 cites W1972578883 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W1979230178 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W1989616882 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W1999507710 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W2019334785 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W2031269878 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W2033786024 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W2035318519 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W2052316248 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W2053114370 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W2079401056 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W2080496470 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W2086594904 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W2086844588 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W2087071662 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W2111604192 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W2125741800 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W2152120717 @default.
• W1992986543 cites W4293108385 @default.
• W1992986543 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2010.04.010" @default.
• W1992986543 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20599063" @default.
• W1992986543 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1992986543 type Work @default.
• W1992986543 sameAs 1992986543 @default.
• W1992986543 citedByCount "31" @default.
• W1992986543 countsByYear W19929865432012 @default.
• W1992986543 countsByYear W19929865432013 @default.
• W1992986543 countsByYear W19929865432014 @default.
• W1992986543 countsByYear W19929865432015 @default.
• W1992986543 countsByYear W19929865432017 @default.
• W1992986543 countsByYear W19929865432018 @default.
• W1992986543 countsByYear W19929865432019 @default.
• W1992986543 countsByYear W19929865432020 @default.
• W1992986543 countsByYear W19929865432021 @default.
• W1992986543 countsByYear W19929865432022 @default.
• W1992986543 countsByYear W19929865432023 @default.
• W1992986543 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1992986543 hasAuthorship W1992986543A5007721880 @default.
• W1992986543 hasAuthorship W1992986543A5036699921 @default.
• W1992986543 hasAuthorship W1992986543A5040662498 @default.
• W1992986543 hasAuthorship W1992986543A5085218962 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConcept C2776692886 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConcept C2779760435 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConcept C2780783599 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConceptScore W1992986543C120665830 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConceptScore W1992986543C121332964 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConceptScore W1992986543C17744445 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConceptScore W1992986543C194828623 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConceptScore W1992986543C199539241 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConceptScore W1992986543C2776692886 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConceptScore W1992986543C2779760435 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConceptScore W1992986543C2780783599 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConceptScore W1992986543C2908647359 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConceptScore W1992986543C61511704 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConceptScore W1992986543C71924100 @default.
• W1992986543 hasConceptScore W1992986543C99454951 @default.
• W1992986543 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W1992986543 hasLocation W19929865431 @default.
• W1992986543 hasLocation W19929865432 @default.
• W1992986543 hasOpenAccess W1992986543 @default.
• W1992986543 hasPrimaryLocation W19929865431 @default.
• W1992986543 hasRelatedWork W1580426574 @default.
• W1992986543 hasRelatedWork W1984877488 @default.
• W1992986543 hasRelatedWork W2089620537 @default.
• W1992986543 hasRelatedWork W2275480158 @default.
• W1992986543 hasRelatedWork W2323950372 @default.
• W1992986543 hasRelatedWork W2371214482 @default.
• W1992986543 hasRelatedWork W2488095972 @default.
• W1992986543 hasRelatedWork W2929987155 @default.
• W1992986543 hasRelatedWork W3201243658 @default.
• W1992986543 hasRelatedWork W4238089809 @default.
• W1992986543 hasVolume "65" @default.
• W1992986543 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1992986543 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1992986543 magId "1992986543" @default.
• W1992986543 workType "article" @default.