FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1993046165> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1993046165 endingPage "219" @default.
• W1993046165 startingPage "215" @default.
• W1993046165 abstract "Objectives: To critically analyze the experience of clinical clerkship students exposed to simulator-based teaching, in order to better understand student perspectives on its utility. Methods: A convenience sample of clinical students (n = 95) rotating through an emergency medicine, surgery, or longitudinal patient-doctor clerkship voluntarily participated in a 2-hour simulator-based teaching session. Groups of 3-5 students managed acute scenarios including respiratory failure, myocardial infarction, or multisystem trauma. After the session, students completed a brief written evaluation asking for free text commentary on the strengths and weaknesses of the experience; they also provided simple satisfaction ratings. Using a qualitative research approach, the textual commentary was transcribed and parsed into fragments, coded for emergent themes, and tested for inter-rater agreement. Results: Six major thematic categories emerged from the qualitative analysis: The “Knowledge & Curriculum” domain was described by 35% of respondents, who commented on the opportunity for self-assessment, recall and memory, basic and clinical science learning, and motivation. “Applied Cognition and Critical Thought” was highlighted by 53% of respondents, who commented on the value of decision-making, active thought, clinical integration, and the uniqueness of learning-by-doing. “Teamwork and Communication” and “Procedural/Hands-On Skills” were each mentioned by 12% of subjects. Observations on the “Teaching/Learning Environment” were offered by 80% of students, who commented on the realism, interactivity, safety, and emotionality of the experience; here they also offered feedback on format, logistics, and instructors. Finally, “Suggestions for Use/Place in Undergraduate Medical Education” were provided by 22% of subjects, who primarily recommended more exposure. On a simple rating scale, 94% of students rated the quality of the simulator session as “excellent,” whereas 91% felt the exercises should be “mandatory.” Conclusion: Full-body simulation promises to address a wide range of pedagogical objectives using a unified educational platform. Students value experiential “practice without risk” and want more exposure to simulation. In this study, students thought that that an integrated simulation exercise could help solidify knowledge across domains, foster critical thought and action, enhance technical-procedural skills, and promote effective teamwork and communication." @default.
• W1993046165 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1993046165 creator A5013529727 @default.
• W1993046165 creator A5026447432 @default.
• W1993046165 creator A5037625924 @default.
• W1993046165 creator A5042331987 @default.
• W1993046165 creator A5085611135 @default.
• W1993046165 creator A5089090583 @default.
• W1993046165 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W1993046165 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1993046165 title "How Do Clinical Clerkship Students Experience Simulator-Based Teaching? A Qualitative Analysis" @default.
• W1993046165 cites W1970134675 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W1976028076 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W1978699343 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W1981898279 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W1988967120 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2011674633 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2021750853 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2024380287 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2045701177 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2055744343 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2055751054 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2059476108 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2068364893 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2076117129 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2081893520 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2087055742 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2103115891 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2129048396 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2138260046 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2141714474 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2143436751 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2324957927 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W2401449611 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W4252375270 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W4323053692 @default.
• W1993046165 cites W4323253299 @default.
• W1993046165 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sih.0000245787.40980.89" @default.
• W1993046165 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19088592" @default.
• W1993046165 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W1993046165 type Work @default.
• W1993046165 sameAs 1993046165 @default.
• W1993046165 citedByCount "42" @default.
• W1993046165 countsByYear W19930461652012 @default.
• W1993046165 countsByYear W19930461652013 @default.
• W1993046165 countsByYear W19930461652014 @default.
• W1993046165 countsByYear W19930461652015 @default.
• W1993046165 countsByYear W19930461652016 @default.
• W1993046165 countsByYear W19930461652017 @default.
• W1993046165 countsByYear W19930461652018 @default.
• W1993046165 countsByYear W19930461652019 @default.
• W1993046165 countsByYear W19930461652020 @default.
• W1993046165 countsByYear W19930461652021 @default.
• W1993046165 countsByYear W19930461652022 @default.
• W1993046165 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1993046165 hasAuthorship W1993046165A5013529727 @default.
• W1993046165 hasAuthorship W1993046165A5026447432 @default.
• W1993046165 hasAuthorship W1993046165A5037625924 @default.
• W1993046165 hasAuthorship W1993046165A5042331987 @default.
• W1993046165 hasAuthorship W1993046165A5085611135 @default.
• W1993046165 hasAuthorship W1993046165A5089090583 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C111226992 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C144430266 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C2779182362 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C49774154 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C111226992 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C136764020 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C144024400 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C144430266 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C15744967 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C17744445 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C190248442 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C19417346 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C199539241 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C2779182362 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C36289849 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C41008148 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C47177190 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C49774154 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C509550671 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C71924100 @default.
• W1993046165 hasConceptScore W1993046165C74196892 @default.
• W1993046165 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1993046165 hasLocation W19930461651 @default.
• W1993046165 hasLocation W19930461652 @default.

• next