FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1993375385> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1993375385 endingPage "1237" @default.
• W1993375385 startingPage "1236" @default.
• W1993375385 abstract "Not many studies have reported clinical experiences on effectiveness and safety of sublingual (swallowed) immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with allergic, IgE-mediated reactions to latex (1, 2). In the studies quoted the scheduled SLIT (Table 1) includes a starting rush phase in 4 days, reaching the dose of 25 drops of the highest concentration. The same scheme is used in our allergy section, as proposed by the producer. The latex extract we employ (Alk-Abello’, Milan, Italy) is an ammoniacal extract quite similar to the one used in manufacturing latex gloves and other articles. So, it contains the major allergen Hev b 5, which is not found in the natural extract. The extract is standardized in w/v and, at his highest concentration, it contains 500 μg of proteins per millilitre. The present communication concerns a 36-year-old woman with latex allergy, affected by urticaria and asthma challenged by the handling or the exposition to latex articles and treated with SLIT. About 20 min after the maximum scheduled dose, the patient showed cutaneous rash and spreading urticaria followed at once by an asthma attack and a serious condition of anaphylactic shock with required treatment in emergency room. The reported case suggests the following remarks. Evidence based studies demonstrate that subcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) is effective for the treatment of allergic respiratory diseases. However systemic reactions, sometimes severe can occur during SIT including occasional fatalities. For these reasons new vaccine with modified-allergens (s.c. allergoides) and a number of alternative methods of immunotherapy have been tried. Among the latter, SLIT proved effective and safe without the risk of severe systemic reactions observed with SIT (3). The high safety of the method allowed home administration. An analysis of published studies yielded the surprising result that SLIT with high doses is safer than SLIT with lower usual doses (4). In other words, it seems there is no correlation between doses increase and increased risk of adverse reactions. For this reason most allergists deem that rush SLIT can be practised without hazards, leading within days to a reduction of symptoms (5). These statements can be regarded as true in almost all cases, but exceptions to the rule exist. Uncommon cases of systemic reactions, sometime severe, have been observed during SLIT (6). The case here reported confirms that rare possibility. It is possible that, because of its excellent tolerability, benefits from rush SLIT largely overcome possible risks. The case we report is an anecdotic one. As for latex allergy, in spite of the previously quoted studies and waiting for the results of the other ones, we should consider that the rush phase of SLIT to latex is loaded a priori, as the rush SIT is, by higher risk of adverse events. In our opinion rush phase of SLIT to latex should always be performed in protected setting, where emergency treatment and intensive care room access must be available." @default.
• W1993375385 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1993375385 creator A5001269425 @default.
• W1993375385 creator A5039440612 @default.
• W1993375385 creator A5079945985 @default.
• W1993375385 date "2006-08-02" @default.
• W1993375385 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W1993375385 title "Anaphylaxis by latex sublingual immunotherapy" @default.
• W1993375385 cites W1969658977 @default.
• W1993375385 cites W2052475583 @default.
• W1993375385 cites W2080894158 @default.
• W1993375385 cites W2132441138 @default.
• W1993375385 cites W2147957152 @default.
• W1993375385 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01155.x" @default.
• W1993375385 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16942577" @default.
• W1993375385 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W1993375385 type Work @default.
• W1993375385 sameAs 1993375385 @default.
• W1993375385 citedByCount "112" @default.
• W1993375385 countsByYear W19933753852012 @default.
• W1993375385 countsByYear W19933753852013 @default.
• W1993375385 countsByYear W19933753852014 @default.
• W1993375385 countsByYear W19933753852015 @default.
• W1993375385 countsByYear W19933753852016 @default.
• W1993375385 countsByYear W19933753852017 @default.
• W1993375385 countsByYear W19933753852019 @default.
• W1993375385 countsByYear W19933753852020 @default.
• W1993375385 countsByYear W19933753852021 @default.
• W1993375385 countsByYear W19933753852022 @default.
• W1993375385 countsByYear W19933753852023 @default.
• W1993375385 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1993375385 hasAuthorship W1993375385A5001269425 @default.
• W1993375385 hasAuthorship W1993375385A5039440612 @default.
• W1993375385 hasAuthorship W1993375385A5079945985 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C141105273 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C159654299 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C16005928 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C199215989 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C207480886 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C2775933838 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C2776042228 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C2777037608 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C2778570526 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C2779787640 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C2780510475 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C2780731369 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C2994163677 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C141105273 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C159654299 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C16005928 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C199215989 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C203014093 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C207480886 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C2775933838 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C2776042228 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C2777037608 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C2778570526 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C2779787640 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C2780510475 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C2780731369 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C2994163677 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C54355233 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C71924100 @default.
• W1993375385 hasConceptScore W1993375385C86803240 @default.
• W1993375385 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W1993375385 hasLocation W19933753851 @default.
• W1993375385 hasLocation W19933753852 @default.
• W1993375385 hasOpenAccess W1993375385 @default.
• W1993375385 hasPrimaryLocation W19933753851 @default.
• W1993375385 hasRelatedWork W1873272194 @default.
• W1993375385 hasRelatedWork W1981593464 @default.
• W1993375385 hasRelatedWork W2071323145 @default.
• W1993375385 hasRelatedWork W2117318598 @default.
• W1993375385 hasRelatedWork W2305450020 @default.
• W1993375385 hasRelatedWork W2375007995 @default.
• W1993375385 hasRelatedWork W2566823494 @default.
• W1993375385 hasRelatedWork W2587893050 @default.
• W1993375385 hasRelatedWork W2791638733 @default.
• W1993375385 hasRelatedWork W4232809972 @default.
• W1993375385 hasVolume "61" @default.
• W1993375385 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1993375385 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1993375385 magId "1993375385" @default.
• W1993375385 workType "article" @default.