FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1993399274> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1993399274 endingPage "276" @default.
• W1993399274 startingPage "276" @default.
• W1993399274 abstract "Objective.A literature review was conducted to identify the reported benefits attributed to telehealth for people living and professionals working in rural and remote areas of Australia. Data sources.Scopus and relevant journals and websites were searched using the terms: telemedicine, telehealth, telepsychiatry, teledermatology, teleradiology, Australia, and each state and territory. Publications since 1998 were included. Study selection.The initial search resulted in 176 articles, which was reduced to 143 when research reporting on Australian rural, regional or remote populations was selected. Data synthesis.A narrative review was conducted using an existing ‘benefits’ framework. Patients are reported to have benefited from: lower costs and reduced inconvenience while accessing specialist health services; improved access to services and improved quality of clinical services. Health professionals are reported to have benefited from: access to continuing education and professional development; provision of enhanced local services; experiential learning, networking and collaboration. Discussion.Rural Australians have reportedly benefited from telehealth. The reported improved access and quality of clinical care available to rural Australians through telemedicine and telehealth may contribute to decreasing the urban–rural health disparities. The reported professional development opportunities and support from specialists through the use of telehealth may contribute to improved rural medical workforce recruitment and retention. What is known about the topic?An extensive international literature has reported on the efficacy of telehealth, and to a lesser extent the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of telemedicine. Systematic reviews conclude that the quality of the studies preclude definitive conclusions being drawn about clinical and cost-effectiveness, although there is some evidence of effective clinical outcomes and the potential for cost-benefits. Little attention has been paid to the benefits reported for people who live in rural and remote Australia, despite this being a rationale for the use of telehealth in rural and remote locations. What does this paper add?Patients in rural and remote locations in Australia are reported to benefit from telehealth by increased access to health services and up-skilled health professionals. Health professionals are reported to benefit from telehealth by up-skilling from increased contact with specialists and increased access to professional development. The review findings suggest that one strategy, the increased use of telehealth, has the potential to reduce the inequitable access to health services and the poorer health status that many rural Australians experience, and contribute to addressing the on-going problem of the recruitment and retention of the rural health workforce. What are the implications for practitioners?The use of telehealth appears to be a path to up-skilling for rural and remote practitioners." @default.
• W1993399274 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1993399274 creator A5050353584 @default.
• W1993399274 creator A5053180455 @default.
• W1993399274 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W1993399274 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W1993399274 title "The reported benefits of telehealth for rural Australians" @default.
• W1993399274 cites W174937644 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W1967516389 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W1972062804 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W1977855791 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W1989929322 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W1993269123 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W1994672784 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2001867234 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2004491005 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2006296248 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2010125440 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2021478580 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2032321450 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2032536637 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2037897393 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2046071349 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2052047466 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2053147852 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2060534786 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2064787979 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2064866107 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2066432419 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2069462057 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2075913715 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2081988167 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2083348093 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2088806583 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2089216078 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2092798529 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2107882780 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2115553348 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2128680116 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2142341361 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2142848735 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2146428792 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2147327403 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2152588605 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2178868491 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W2727104815 @default.
• W1993399274 cites W1999379498 @default.
• W1993399274 doi "https://doi.org/10.1071/ah09794" @default.
• W1993399274 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20797357" @default.
• W1993399274 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1993399274 type Work @default.
• W1993399274 sameAs 1993399274 @default.
• W1993399274 citedByCount "257" @default.
• W1993399274 countsByYear W19933992742012 @default.
• W1993399274 countsByYear W19933992742013 @default.
• W1993399274 countsByYear W19933992742014 @default.
• W1993399274 countsByYear W19933992742015 @default.
• W1993399274 countsByYear W19933992742016 @default.
• W1993399274 countsByYear W19933992742017 @default.
• W1993399274 countsByYear W19933992742018 @default.
• W1993399274 countsByYear W19933992742019 @default.
• W1993399274 countsByYear W19933992742020 @default.
• W1993399274 countsByYear W19933992742021 @default.
• W1993399274 countsByYear W19933992742022 @default.
• W1993399274 countsByYear W19933992742023 @default.
• W1993399274 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1993399274 hasAuthorship W1993399274A5050353584 @default.
• W1993399274 hasAuthorship W1993399274A5053180455 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C129047720 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C2776716344 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C2778139618 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C2779891985 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C2779958979 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C2781050511 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConcept C73884952 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C129047720 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C142724271 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C159110408 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C160735492 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C162324750 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C2776716344 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C2778139618 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C2779891985 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C2779958979 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C2781050511 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C50522688 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C509550671 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C512399662 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C71924100 @default.
• W1993399274 hasConceptScore W1993399274C73884952 @default.

• next