FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1993854102> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1993854102 endingPage "326" @default.
• W1993854102 startingPage "302" @default.
• W1993854102 abstract "Purpose – The purpose of this study is to investigate consumer reactions to professionals who use decision aids to make recommendations. The authors propose that people react negatively to decision aids only when they are used in place of human expert judgment. When used in combination with expert judgment, decision aids are not perceived negatively and may even enhance service evaluations. Design/methodology/approach – Three online experiments are presented. Participants indicated their perceptions regarding the recommendation strategy of professionals and their impressions of these professionals using one of three strategies: one based on expertise only, one based on decision aids only and a combination of the two (hybrid approach). Both within and between-subjects designs were used. Findings – Contrary to previous research that has found a negative reaction to professionals who use decision aids, the authors find that consumers actually appreciate these professionals, as long as the use of decision aids does not replace expert judgment. The authors also find that when people are given the opportunity to compare a pure expert judgment approach with a hybrid approach (decision aid in combination with expert judgment), they prefer the latter. Research limitations/implications – Although findings should extend to various contexts, this research is limited to the three contexts examined and to the type of use of decision aid described. Practical implications – It has significant practical implication, as decision aids have been shown to improve decision accuracy, but previous research had indicated that consumers view these professionals in a negative way. The current research more clearly delineates the situations under which negative reactions are likely to occur and makes recommendations regarding circumstances in which reactions are actually quite positive. Originality/value – Reactions to professionals using decision aids have been investigated outside the marketing literature. However, this is the first work to show that consumers actually have positive reactions to professionals using decision aids, as long as they do not replace expert judgment." @default.
• W1993854102 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1993854102 creator A5000049689 @default.
• W1993854102 creator A5087983870 @default.
• W1993854102 date "2015-04-13" @default.
• W1993854102 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1993854102 title "Consumer reactions to professionals who use decision aids" @default.
• W1993854102 cites W1531560828 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W1972787521 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W1972915807 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W1973687016 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W1983907951 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W1993975012 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W1994506128 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2012218966 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2026169005 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2032618582 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2033275890 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2033940782 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2042113379 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2042124062 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2045929661 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2047068783 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2048579880 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2059441062 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2062845493 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2066372951 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2070125214 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2077073102 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2085105383 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2089092465 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2089253993 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2091831241 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2120993987 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2138216392 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2138403150 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2146385426 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2150563888 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2153915296 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2154470526 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2158570360 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2168729696 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2169278438 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2171321543 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2316250154 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2324040022 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W2327425965 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W3121411908 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W3122516274 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W3123772816 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W3124102437 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W3124492796 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W4240582862 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W4247788767 @default.
• W1993854102 cites W4252566519 @default.
• W1993854102 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-07-2013-0390" @default.
• W1993854102 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1993854102 type Work @default.
• W1993854102 sameAs 1993854102 @default.
• W1993854102 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W1993854102 countsByYear W19938541022015 @default.
• W1993854102 countsByYear W19938541022019 @default.
• W1993854102 countsByYear W19938541022020 @default.
• W1993854102 countsByYear W19938541022021 @default.
• W1993854102 countsByYear W19938541022022 @default.
• W1993854102 countsByYear W19938541022023 @default.
• W1993854102 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1993854102 hasAuthorship W1993854102A5000049689 @default.
• W1993854102 hasAuthorship W1993854102A5087983870 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConcept C144237770 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConcept C186116695 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConcept C2780033181 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConceptScore W1993854102C142724271 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConceptScore W1993854102C144133560 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConceptScore W1993854102C144237770 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConceptScore W1993854102C15744967 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConceptScore W1993854102C162324750 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConceptScore W1993854102C162853370 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConceptScore W1993854102C169760540 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConceptScore W1993854102C186116695 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConceptScore W1993854102C204787440 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConceptScore W1993854102C26760741 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConceptScore W1993854102C2780033181 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConceptScore W1993854102C41008148 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConceptScore W1993854102C56739046 @default.
• W1993854102 hasConceptScore W1993854102C71924100 @default.
• W1993854102 hasIssue "3/4" @default.

• next