FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1994412314> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1994412314 abstract "There is evidence that IMRT treatments may not always be as accurate as practitioners believe. In 2006, the Radiological Physics Center (RPC) reported that of the 155 institutions that had irradiated a head and neck phantom as part of an IMRT credentialing process, 54 (35%) had failed to meet accuracy criteria of 7% for dose in a low gradient region and/or 4 mm distance to agreement in a high gradient region. This experience strongly suggests that some clinics have not adequately commissioned their planning and delivery systems for IMRT. By “commissioning”, we mean beam modeling in the treatment planning system and initial verification by phantom studies that treatments can be planned, prepared, and delivered with sufficient accuracy. Task Group 119 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) has developed a specific set of tests for IMRT commissioning that are representative of common clinical treatments and pose a range of optimization problems requiring simple to complex modulation patterns. The tests include mock prostate, head and neck, and peri‐spinal geometries. Members of the group have planned and delivered the treatments using their local planning and delivery systems, and then assessed the resulting doses using broadly available dosimetry tools following a specified protocol. Measurements included ion chamber point doses and film dosimetry on selected planes for all fields irradiating the phantom. Institutions also evaluated dose distributions produced by individual fields using detector arrays, film, or EPID. Eight institutions have reported their results with nine different combinations of planning systems and accelerators. All have passed the RPC IMRT phantom test. The summary of the preliminary data shows: One institution identified the need to improve the beam modeling using these tests for better agreement between planned and delivered doses for IMRT. The presentation will illustrate (1) that the percent of points passing the gamma criteria is highly dependent on the details of the implementation of the test and (2) that testing the individual fields with a gamma test can be insensitive to problems and is not sufficient for commissioning. (3) The tolerance limits based on Dose‐difference distribution, distance‐to‐agreement (DTA), and a numerical gamma index for IMRT QA are often not adequate because all these methodologies do not account for space‐specific dose uncertainty information. (4) beam modeling affects the plan and delivered dose agreement. Educational Objectives: 1. To describe the uncertainties in IMRT planning and delivery‐describe the impact of spatial and dosimetric uncertainties on the IMRTdose distribution. 2. Obtain examples of commissioning results for standardized IMRT studies that can be used for comparison with a clinic's IMRT system. 3. See how these standardized tests can be downloaded or created for local testing purposes. 4. See examples of how the gamma criterion can vary depending on details of its implementation. 5. See examples of limitation of gamma criterion testing for identifying problems with individual IMRT fields." @default.
• W1994412314 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1994412314 creator A5020610248 @default.
• W1994412314 creator A5073284026 @default.
• W1994412314 creator A5079985074 @default.
• W1994412314 date "2008-06-01" @default.
• W1994412314 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1994412314 title "WE-A-AUD C-01: IMRT Commissioning: A Multi-Center Evaluation of a Standardized Test Protocol" @default.
• W1994412314 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2963118" @default.
• W1994412314 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W1994412314 type Work @default.
• W1994412314 sameAs 1994412314 @default.
• W1994412314 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1994412314 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1994412314 hasAuthorship W1994412314A5020610248 @default.
• W1994412314 hasAuthorship W1994412314A5073284026 @default.
• W1994412314 hasAuthorship W1994412314A5079985074 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C106436119 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C110354214 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C2778618615 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C2780385302 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C2780530410 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C2985126265 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C3018411727 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C31601959 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConcept C9267231 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C104293457 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C106436119 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C110354214 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C126838900 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C127413603 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C141071460 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C142724271 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C19527891 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C201645570 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C204787440 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C2778618615 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C2780385302 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C2780530410 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C2985126265 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C2989005 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C3018411727 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C31601959 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C41008148 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C509550671 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C509974204 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C71924100 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C75088862 @default.
• W1994412314 hasConceptScore W1994412314C9267231 @default.
• W1994412314 hasLocation W19944123141 @default.
• W1994412314 hasOpenAccess W1994412314 @default.
• W1994412314 hasPrimaryLocation W19944123141 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W1560083377 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W1996864949 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2008409468 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2014738110 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2016006364 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2028448259 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2077200403 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2078011138 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2079715730 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2080296125 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2151253091 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2169379958 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2749375587 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2750587861 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2785206753 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2906546619 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2913448414 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W2964998168 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W3025686102 @default.
• W1994412314 hasRelatedWork W3030131902 @default.
• W1994412314 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1994412314 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1994412314 magId "1994412314" @default.
• W1994412314 workType "article" @default.