FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1994510965> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1994510965 endingPage "2980" @default.
• W1994510965 startingPage "2967" @default.
• W1994510965 abstract "The treatment of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oropharynx remains controversial. No randomized trial has addressed adequately the question of whether surgery (S), radiation therapy (RT), or combined treatment is most effective.Treatment results from North American academic institutions that used S with or without adjuvant RT (S +/- RT) or used RT alone or followed by neck dissection (RT +/- ND) for patients with SCC of the tonsillar region or the base of tongue were compiled through a MEDLINE search (from 1970 to August, 2000) and from the references cited in each report. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they contained direct, actuarial (life-table), or Kaplan-Meier calculations for the following end points: local control, local-regional control, 5-year absolute survival, 5-year cause specific survival, or severe or fatal treatment complications. Weighted average results, which took into account series size, were calculated for each end point for the purposes of treatment comparison. Results and conclusions were based on data from 51 reported series, representing the treatment of approximately 6400 patients from the United States and Canada.The results for patients with SCC of the base of tongue who underwent S +/- RT versus RT +/- ND, respectively, were as follows: local control, 79% versus 76% (P = 0.087); local-regional control, 60% versus 69% (P = 0.009); 5-year survival, 49% versus 52% (P = 0.2); 5-year cause specific survival, 62% versus 63% (P = 0.4); severe complications, 32% versus 3.8% (P < 0.001); and fatal complications, 3.5% versus 0.4% (P < 0.001). The results for patients with SCC in the tonsillar region who underwent S +/- RT versus RT +/- ND, respectively, were as follows: local control, 70% versus 68% (P = 0.2); local-regional control, 65% versus 69% (P = 0.1); 5-year survival, 47% versus 43% (P = 0.2); 5-year cause specific survival, 57% versus 59% (P = 0.3); severe complications, 23% versus 6% (P < 0.001); and fatal complications, 3.2% versus 0.8% (P < 0.001).The information in this article provides a useful benchmark for evidence-based counseling of patients with SCC of the oropharynx. The rates of local control, local-regional control, 5-year survival, and 5-year cause specific survival were similar for patients who underwent S +/- RT or RT +/- ND, whereas the rates of severe or fatal complications were significantly greater for the S +/- RT group. Furthermore, available data on the functional consequences of treatment suggest the superiority of RT +/- ND. The authors conclude that RT +/- ND is preferable for the majority of patients with SCC of the oropharynx." @default.
• W1994510965 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1994510965 creator A5003752068 @default.
• W1994510965 creator A5008642709 @default.
• W1994510965 creator A5040300839 @default.
• W1994510965 creator A5040712190 @default.
• W1994510965 creator A5041639791 @default.
• W1994510965 creator A5044330985 @default.
• W1994510965 creator A5051493426 @default.
• W1994510965 creator A5055164786 @default.
• W1994510965 creator A5061408698 @default.
• W1994510965 creator A5075709216 @default.
• W1994510965 creator A5080259332 @default.
• W1994510965 date "2002-05-23" @default.
• W1994510965 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W1994510965 title "Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx" @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1784479792 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1966183433 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1967914842 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1968741994 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1970351776 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1972162118 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1974404080 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1976679977 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1977780721 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1980782638 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1982614562 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1986017884 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1988516154 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1990095718 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1992865117 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1994730839 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1996655864 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1997259364 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W1999694342 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2006895851 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2013410156 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2019305599 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2019453244 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2022395184 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2026365581 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2028730360 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2033038408 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2039012019 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2043363278 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2046917312 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2050509630 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2050836745 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2056701227 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2059972525 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2060818218 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2063310955 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2066677235 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2070301512 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2071053438 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2071138848 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2077893322 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2078527449 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2079816780 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2082522340 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2083600352 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2088646788 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2091588557 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2091975699 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2094765838 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2102940690 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2107140038 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2108889398 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2114339245 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2121249235 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2124464105 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2126024772 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2126367968 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2126946284 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2127706270 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2139554459 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2141690616 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2142631152 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2146148650 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2148417509 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2149910644 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2151415400 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2152609192 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2155633075 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2159699827 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2169137451 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2171583583 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2172288146 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2304036117 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2321681371 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2331395194 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2332065761 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2335285363 @default.
• W1994510965 cites W2412448001 @default.
• W1994510965 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10567" @default.
• W1994510965 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12115386" @default.
• W1994510965 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W1994510965 type Work @default.

• next