FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1994920685> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1994920685 endingPage "336" @default.
• W1994920685 startingPage "328" @default.
• W1994920685 abstract "This letter details the collective views of a number of independent researchers on the technical assessment and evaluation of environmental models and software. The purpose is to stimulate debate and initiate action that leads to an improved quality of model development and evaluation, so increasing the capacity for models to have positive outcomes from their use. As such, we emphasize the relationship between the model evaluation process and credibility with stakeholders (including funding agencies) with a view to ensure continued support for modelling efforts. Many journals, including EM&S, publish the results of environmental modelling studies and must judge the work and the submitted papers based solely on the material that the authors have chosen to present and on how they present it. There is considerable variation in how this is done with the consequent risk of considerable variation in the quality and usefulness of the resulting publication. Part of the problem is that the review process is reactive, responding to the submitted manuscript. In this letter, we attempt to be proactive and give guidelines for researchers, authors and reviewers as to what constitutes best practice in presenting environmental modelling results. This is a unique contribution to the organisation and practice of model-based research and the communication of its results that will benefit the entire environmental modelling community. For a start, our view is that the community of environmental modellers should have a common vision of minimum standards that an environmental model must meet. A common vision of what a good model should be is expressed in various guidelines on Good Modelling Practice. The guidelines prompt modellers to codify their practice and to be more rigorous in their model testing. Our statement within this letter deals with another aspect of the issue – it prompts professional journals to codify the peer-review process. Introducing a more formalized approach to peer-review may discourage reviewers from accepting invitations to review given the additional time and labour requirements. The burden of proving model credibility is thus shifted to the authors. Here we discuss how to reduce this burden by selecting realistic evaluation criteria and conclude by advocating the use of standardized evaluation tools as this is a key issue that needs to be tackled." @default.
• W1994920685 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5003421157 @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5006070568 @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5007501725 @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5020715497 @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5030319926 @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5031238987 @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5044734782 @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5046503775 @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5048260137 @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5053220196 @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5060107260 @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5083163672 @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5083432491 @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5084795321 @default.
• W1994920685 creator A5090161821 @default.
• W1994920685 date "2011-03-01" @default.
• W1994920685 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1994920685 title "Technical assessment and evaluation of environmental models and software: Letter to the Editor" @default.
• W1994920685 cites W1932382878 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W1974905637 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W1975767174 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W1985196260 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W1991921673 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W1998523300 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2012381582 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2016451053 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2017756287 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2019820822 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2021219664 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2023668310 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2027887161 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2033206807 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2033461931 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2038698475 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2039791881 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2047853011 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2059423528 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2062554607 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2064748396 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2066971047 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2075648393 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2075994569 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2081346522 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2083306946 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2083892907 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2103349114 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2112090981 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2112101541 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2112941849 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2113529926 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2118620757 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2135443417 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2148752293 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2149160185 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2157238761 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2168233104 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2170357651 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W2316273349 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W4238878258 @default.
• W1994920685 cites W4244409774 @default.
• W1994920685 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.08.004" @default.
• W1994920685 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W1994920685 type Work @default.
• W1994920685 sameAs 1994920685 @default.
• W1994920685 citedByCount "65" @default.
• W1994920685 countsByYear W19949206852012 @default.
• W1994920685 countsByYear W19949206852013 @default.
• W1994920685 countsByYear W19949206852014 @default.
• W1994920685 countsByYear W19949206852015 @default.
• W1994920685 countsByYear W19949206852016 @default.
• W1994920685 countsByYear W19949206852017 @default.
• W1994920685 countsByYear W19949206852018 @default.
• W1994920685 countsByYear W19949206852019 @default.
• W1994920685 countsByYear W19949206852021 @default.
• W1994920685 countsByYear W19949206852022 @default.
• W1994920685 countsByYear W19949206852023 @default.
• W1994920685 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5003421157 @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5006070568 @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5007501725 @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5020715497 @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5030319926 @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5031238987 @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5044734782 @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5046503775 @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5048260137 @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5053220196 @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5060107260 @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5083163672 @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5083432491 @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5084795321 @default.
• W1994920685 hasAuthorship W1994920685A5090161821 @default.
• W1994920685 hasBestOaLocation W19949206853 @default.
• W1994920685 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1994920685 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W1994920685 hasConcept C112930515 @default.

• next