FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1995124549> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1995124549 endingPage "131" @default.
• W1995124549 startingPage "128" @default.
• W1995124549 abstract "Reviewed by: Deserter Country: Civil War Opposition in the Pennsylvania Appalachians Melinda Lawson Deserter Country: Civil War Opposition in the Pennsylvania Appalachians. By Robert Sandow. New York: Fordham University Press, 2009. ISBN: 978-0-8232-3051-8, 288 pp., cloth, $55.00. America’s military conflicts have almost always triggered dissent, as Robert Sandow points out in his excellent new book, Deserter Country: Civil War Opposition in the Pennsylvania Appalachians. What is less clear is what to make of this dissent—its nature, its extent, its power. In the case of the Civil War, the debate over these issues has for years been dominated by Frank Klement, who argued that Civil War Republicans unjustly defined Democratic dissent as widespread, conspiratorial, and treasonous. More recently, [End Page 128] Klement’s challengers have suggested that Civil War Republicans had it right, more or less: wartime dissent was extensive, it not infrequently verged on treason, and it came close to ending the northern war effort. Sandow’s Deserter Country is the newest entry in this debate, and it offers a refreshingly nuanced analysis of the subject. Focusing on the Pennsylvania Appalachians—an area dubbed “deserter country” by contemporaries—Sandow sets out to uncover the causes and nature of wartime dissent. Though the focus of most scholars of resistance to the war has been on immigrant laborers and industrial centers, the mountains of the Keystone State are particularly appropriate for study because, as the author asserts, “the most important fact about Northern opposition” was that “the majority of war opponents were not the immigrants living in the North’s crowded manufacturing cities but the backbone of rural America” (8). Drawing on manuscript censuses, government records, legal documents, and newspapers, Deserter Country approaches the question of wartime dissent from the perspective of the dissenters. Sandow’s study begins with a rich, evocative description of the world of the farmers and woodsmen who populated this part of Pennsylvania. Mountainous terrain, dense forests, and poor soil led farmers to turn to the lumber they cleared to supplement their income, floating timber rafts downriver for sale or barter. One remove from the newly expanding market economy, the area was largely Democratic. When the market finally arrived in the Pennsylvania Appalachians, steam sawmills and log drives threatened the farmers’ livelihood. Their response revealed strong local identities and republicanism rooted in land ownership. Since state Republican leaders were the advancing market’s chief advocates, the conflict was also understood in partisan terms. In 1857, tensions culminated in a violent raftsmen’s rebellion. By the time the Civil War brought new burdens to Pennsylvania’s mountain farmers, a political culture defined by these values and experiences characterized the region. As wartime policies pulled labor from the fields and made demands on local communities, the farmers placed the blame for their problems on the Republican administration. Conscription and emancipation exacerbated animosity toward the government among a people leery of strangers and committed to states’ rights and white supremacy. In many ways, resistance to war measures in the Pennsylvania mountains mirrored the trajectory of wartime opposition throughout the North. In newspapers, churches, and political organizations, residents argued about the [End Page 129] values of the nation and the meaning of patriotism. Party interest was never far from these debates: there were rural Union Leagues promoting devotion to Republican ideals and Democratic vigilance societies cultivating voter loyalty. Though Republicans claimed to have discovered a chapter of the largely illusory Knights of the Golden Circle, there is no evidence that one existed. While Republican fears were exaggerated for partisan effect, there was some truth to the charges of violent resistance. Democratic editorials reflected the desperation and powerlessness the farmers felt, particularly after the Conscription Act. Living in poverty and burdened with family responsibilities, facing seemingly arbitrary incursions by an intrusive state, they employed the “weapons of the weak”: “foot dragging, desertion, false compliance, pilfering, feigned ignorance, slander, arson, and sabotage” (104). Mutual protection societies formed to assist men who had been drafted or had deserted. The wooded environs nurtured this resistance: with few navigable roads, draft resisters and deserters found a safe haven. And the community supported them: enrollment officers were harassed or assaulted—of..." @default.
• W1995124549 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1995124549 creator A5001897277 @default.
• W1995124549 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W1995124549 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1995124549 title "<i>Deserter Country: Civil War Opposition in the Pennsylvania Appalachians</i> (review)" @default.
• W1995124549 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.2012.0040" @default.
• W1995124549 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1995124549 type Work @default.
• W1995124549 sameAs 1995124549 @default.
• W1995124549 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1995124549 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1995124549 hasAuthorship W1995124549A5001897277 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConcept C2780668109 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConcept C523173360 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConcept C81631423 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConceptScore W1995124549C144024400 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConceptScore W1995124549C17744445 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConceptScore W1995124549C199539241 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConceptScore W1995124549C2780668109 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConceptScore W1995124549C523173360 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConceptScore W1995124549C555826173 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConceptScore W1995124549C81631423 @default.
• W1995124549 hasConceptScore W1995124549C94625758 @default.
• W1995124549 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1995124549 hasLocation W19951245491 @default.
• W1995124549 hasOpenAccess W1995124549 @default.
• W1995124549 hasPrimaryLocation W19951245491 @default.
• W1995124549 hasRelatedWork W1995124549 @default.
• W1995124549 hasRelatedWork W2044964693 @default.
• W1995124549 hasRelatedWork W2114528532 @default.
• W1995124549 hasRelatedWork W2153469859 @default.
• W1995124549 hasRelatedWork W2316729823 @default.
• W1995124549 hasRelatedWork W2593987168 @default.
• W1995124549 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1995124549 hasRelatedWork W2797885045 @default.
• W1995124549 hasRelatedWork W3207651687 @default.
• W1995124549 hasRelatedWork W4248406291 @default.
• W1995124549 hasVolume "58" @default.
• W1995124549 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1995124549 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1995124549 magId "1995124549" @default.
• W1995124549 workType "article" @default.