FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1995146211> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1995146211 endingPage "265" @default.
• W1995146211 startingPage "265" @default.
• W1995146211 abstract "Thearticle “The Hidden Costs of Failing to Fail Residents”1 in the June 2011 issue of the Journal of Graduate Medical Education might be better titled “W hy Don't We Dismiss Residents?” The article by Drs Roberts and Williams is a carefully considered discussion of the problems inherent in dealing with poor resident performance. To assure the public that trainees have acquired the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to independently practice medicine, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and its Review Committees have developed more specific requirements and have substantially increased the need for documentation. Increased analysis of resident performance has uncovered more resident performance issues. It is not clear whether we are seeing more unprofessional behavior in physicians2,3 because residents currently in training are different from those from earlier generations, or that as supervisory faculty, we may have missed or overlooked some of these deficiencies in the past. There is some evidence in recent years that we are seeing more unprofessional behavior in physicians.2,3The concept of failure is extremely important. Residents who do not demonstrate competence to the level of the program's academic and professional standards should not be advanced. There is merit in providing residents the opportunity to remediate. Repetition of clinical rotations for residents with academic difficulty can be beneficial for residents to develop into practicing physicians.Problems in the area of professionalism are more difficult to remediate. We have found that residents with professionalism challenges are either “socially promoted” as described in the article or are issued notices of nonreappointment. However, for programs to be able to offer remediation for professionalism, there need to be models for remediation. Review of the literature demonstrates a dearth of literature and/or evidence of successful models.4The ACGME provides residents with a due process that often, as the authors allude to, brings in the legal system, which makes the dismissal process time and labor intensive. Although a program may be maintaining exact, detailed records of the performance issues, residents challenge or appeal their dismissals, which makes programs reticent to pursue this course of action. The fear of litigation should not be an issue if the process has been objectively followed and documented, and the dismissal is not “arbitrary and capricious.” The courts will not intrude on the academic judgment if due process is followed (ie, an individual is notified of the issue, given an opportunity to respond, and offered remediation if possible). Although dismissal is frequently saved for only very egregious performance issues, this should not be the case.Until program directors and faculty are comfortable with failing residents as well as dismissing them for performance issues, nothing will change except that program directors', designated institutional officials', and general counsels' frustrations will continue to increase." @default.
• W1995146211 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1995146211 creator A5056554963 @default.
• W1995146211 creator A5058494163 @default.
• W1995146211 creator A5078886006 @default.
• W1995146211 date "2012-06-01" @default.
• W1995146211 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1995146211 title "Why Don't We Dismiss Residents?" @default.
• W1995146211 cites W1974438238 @default.
• W1995146211 cites W2027927833 @default.
• W1995146211 cites W2068098669 @default.
• W1995146211 cites W2094765071 @default.
• W1995146211 doi "https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-11-00228.1" @default.
• W1995146211 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3399627" @default.
• W1995146211 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23730456" @default.
• W1995146211 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1995146211 type Work @default.
• W1995146211 sameAs 1995146211 @default.
• W1995146211 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W1995146211 countsByYear W19951462112020 @default.
• W1995146211 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1995146211 hasAuthorship W1995146211A5056554963 @default.
• W1995146211 hasAuthorship W1995146211A5058494163 @default.
• W1995146211 hasAuthorship W1995146211A5078886006 @default.
• W1995146211 hasBestOaLocation W19951462111 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C2779328685 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C2779767262 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C61521584 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C100521375 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C15744967 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C160735492 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C17744445 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C199360897 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C199539241 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C2779328685 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C2779473830 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C2779767262 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C41008148 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C509550671 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C56666940 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C61521584 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C71924100 @default.
• W1995146211 hasConceptScore W1995146211C77805123 @default.
• W1995146211 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1995146211 hasLocation W19951462111 @default.
• W1995146211 hasLocation W19951462112 @default.
• W1995146211 hasLocation W19951462113 @default.
• W1995146211 hasLocation W19951462114 @default.
• W1995146211 hasOpenAccess W1995146211 @default.
• W1995146211 hasPrimaryLocation W19951462111 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W1430084660 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W1563667313 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W1594253877 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W1598131442 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W170665405 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W1932705580 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W1975371860 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W1988607655 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W2021869629 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W2024088749 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W2031479420 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W2050659368 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W2078151856 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W2092625895 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W2095659379 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W2132762937 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W2138498142 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W2155156462 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W2333692564 @default.
• W1995146211 hasRelatedWork W272579378 @default.
• W1995146211 hasVolume "4" @default.
• W1995146211 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1995146211 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1995146211 magId "1995146211" @default.
• W1995146211 workType "article" @default.