FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1995157040> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1995157040 endingPage "863" @default.
• W1995157040 startingPage "858" @default.
• W1995157040 abstract "ObjectiveNational arthroplasty registers are often cited as examples of a non-randomized design that have made an essential contribution to advances in assessing arthroplasty procedures. We aimed to compare national registers to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses in the field of arthroplasty in terms of scientific production and impact.MethodWe systematically searched Medline via PubMed and the registers’ websites to select all articles from national registers, RCTs and meta-analyses assessing hip and knee arthroplasty. The scientific production and impact were evaluated by number of publications, number of citations (total and the 3-year citation counts), and information on the 2008 journal impact factor (IF), for each design and identified articles. We also contacted representatives of all the selected registers to determine the availability of the data for external research projects.ResultsWe retrieved information on 13 active national hip or knee arthroplasty registers; for 9, data were available for research projects under specific conditions. Overall, 190 publications in peer-reviewed journals resulted from national arthroplasty registers, 476 from RCTs, and 40 from meta-analyses. We found 4,112 citations for national register reports, 7,328 for RCT reports and 552 for meta-analysis reports. The median [interquartile [IQR] range] number of citations for register, RCT and meta-analysis reports in the 3-year period after publication was 3.5 [1.0–6.0], 2.0 [1.0–6.0], and 2.5 [0.5–7.5], respectively.ConclusionPublications from national registers may have the highest impact among the 3 designs in terms of median citation counts, but data from RCTs remain the most productive evidence in the arthroplasty field. Because of the number of patients recruited by registers, the quality of data collected, and the potential availability of data, scientific production and impact from national registers should be improved. National arthroplasty registers are often cited as examples of a non-randomized design that have made an essential contribution to advances in assessing arthroplasty procedures. We aimed to compare national registers to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses in the field of arthroplasty in terms of scientific production and impact. We systematically searched Medline via PubMed and the registers’ websites to select all articles from national registers, RCTs and meta-analyses assessing hip and knee arthroplasty. The scientific production and impact were evaluated by number of publications, number of citations (total and the 3-year citation counts), and information on the 2008 journal impact factor (IF), for each design and identified articles. We also contacted representatives of all the selected registers to determine the availability of the data for external research projects. We retrieved information on 13 active national hip or knee arthroplasty registers; for 9, data were available for research projects under specific conditions. Overall, 190 publications in peer-reviewed journals resulted from national arthroplasty registers, 476 from RCTs, and 40 from meta-analyses. We found 4,112 citations for national register reports, 7,328 for RCT reports and 552 for meta-analysis reports. The median [interquartile [IQR] range] number of citations for register, RCT and meta-analysis reports in the 3-year period after publication was 3.5 [1.0–6.0], 2.0 [1.0–6.0], and 2.5 [0.5–7.5], respectively. Publications from national registers may have the highest impact among the 3 designs in terms of median citation counts, but data from RCTs remain the most productive evidence in the arthroplasty field. Because of the number of patients recruited by registers, the quality of data collected, and the potential availability of data, scientific production and impact from national registers should be improved." @default.
• W1995157040 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1995157040 creator A5028858278 @default.
• W1995157040 creator A5050180409 @default.
• W1995157040 creator A5065028933 @default.
• W1995157040 date "2011-07-01" @default.
• W1995157040 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W1995157040 title "Scientific production and impact of national registers: the example of orthopaedic national registers" @default.
• W1995157040 cites W1746983276 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W1976576973 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W1981978761 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W1995475103 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2015712245 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2023155726 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2032854736 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2044136777 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2052432047 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2064961604 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2069136655 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2071806619 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2073694979 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2082858755 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2095551172 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2115793908 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2121073276 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2125667836 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2131326009 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2135336774 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2144981148 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2149258159 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2151099184 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2159139871 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W2169877598 @default.
• W1995157040 cites W4300836056 @default.
• W1995157040 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2011.02.006" @default.
• W1995157040 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21362489" @default.
• W1995157040 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W1995157040 type Work @default.
• W1995157040 sameAs 1995157040 @default.
• W1995157040 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W1995157040 countsByYear W19951570402012 @default.
• W1995157040 countsByYear W19951570402013 @default.
• W1995157040 countsByYear W19951570402014 @default.
• W1995157040 countsByYear W19951570402015 @default.
• W1995157040 countsByYear W19951570402016 @default.
• W1995157040 countsByYear W19951570402017 @default.
• W1995157040 countsByYear W19951570402018 @default.
• W1995157040 countsByYear W19951570402019 @default.
• W1995157040 countsByYear W19951570402021 @default.
• W1995157040 countsByYear W19951570402022 @default.
• W1995157040 countsByYear W19951570402023 @default.
• W1995157040 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1995157040 hasAuthorship W1995157040A5028858278 @default.
• W1995157040 hasAuthorship W1995157040A5050180409 @default.
• W1995157040 hasAuthorship W1995157040A5065028933 @default.
• W1995157040 hasBestOaLocation W19951570401 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConcept C119060515 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConceptScore W1995157040C119060515 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConceptScore W1995157040C126322002 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConceptScore W1995157040C141071460 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConceptScore W1995157040C168563851 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConceptScore W1995157040C17744445 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConceptScore W1995157040C1862650 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConceptScore W1995157040C199539241 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConceptScore W1995157040C2778336525 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConceptScore W1995157040C2779473830 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConceptScore W1995157040C71924100 @default.
• W1995157040 hasConceptScore W1995157040C95190672 @default.
• W1995157040 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W1995157040 hasLocation W19951570401 @default.
• W1995157040 hasLocation W19951570402 @default.
• W1995157040 hasOpenAccess W1995157040 @default.
• W1995157040 hasPrimaryLocation W19951570401 @default.
• W1995157040 hasRelatedWork W1967911880 @default.
• W1995157040 hasRelatedWork W2073138496 @default.
• W1995157040 hasRelatedWork W2172381268 @default.
• W1995157040 hasRelatedWork W2310809385 @default.
• W1995157040 hasRelatedWork W2530277175 @default.
• W1995157040 hasRelatedWork W3183594846 @default.
• W1995157040 hasRelatedWork W3194431952 @default.
• W1995157040 hasRelatedWork W4315488258 @default.
• W1995157040 hasRelatedWork W4360608871 @default.
• W1995157040 hasRelatedWork W4368356939 @default.
• W1995157040 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W1995157040 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1995157040 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1995157040 magId "1995157040" @default.
• W1995157040 workType "article" @default.