FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1995492795> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1995492795 abstract "Purpose: This study is to develop a systematic approach for determining the most efficient patient appointment scheduling (PAS) model for a specific healthcare setting with its multiple appointments requests characteristics in order to increase patients’ accessibility and resource utilization, and reduce operation cost. In this study, three general appointment scheduling models, centralized scheduling model (CSM), decentralized scheduling model (DSM) and hybrid scheduling model (HSM), are considered. Design/methodology/approach: The integration of discrete event simulation and data envelopment analysis (DEA) is applied to determine the most efficient PAS model. Simulation analysis is used to obtain the outputs of different configurations of PAS, and the DEA based on the simulation outputs is applied to select the best configuration in the presence of multiple and contrary performance measures. The best PAS configuration provides an optimal balance between patient satisfaction, schedulers’ utilization and the cost of the scheduling system and schedulers’ training. Findings: In the presence of high proportion (more than 70%) of requests for multiple appointments, CSM is the best PAS model. If the proportion of requests for multiple appointments is medium (25%-50%), HSM is the best. Finally, if the proportion of requests for multiple appointments is low (less than 15%), DSM is the best. If the proportion is in the interval from 15% to 25% the selected PAS model could be either DSM or HSM based on expert idea. Similarly, if the proportion is in the interval from 50% to 70% the best PAS model could be either CSM or HSM. Originality/value: This is the first study that determines the best PAS model for a particular healthcare setting. The proposed approach can be used in a variety of the healthcare settings. Keywords: data envelopment analysis, discrete event simulation, patient appointment scheduling, multiple appointments, centralized scheduling model, decentralized scheduling model, hybrid scheduling model" @default.
• W1995492795 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1995492795 creator A5049142005 @default.
• W1995492795 creator A5084766489 @default.
• W1995492795 date "2014-09-16" @default.
• W1995492795 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W1995492795 title "Integration of simulation and DEA to determine the most efficient patient appointment scheduling model for a specific healthcare setting" @default.
• W1995492795 cites W1535955094 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W1560289552 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W1599348482 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W1972061795 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W1991456892 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W2000200316 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W2006096769 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W2010858721 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W2031346079 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W2044799647 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W2078724364 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W2094519759 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W2105013779 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W2133511976 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W2144081616 @default.
• W1995492795 cites W2171806984 @default.
• W1995492795 doi "https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1058" @default.
• W1995492795 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1995492795 type Work @default.
• W1995492795 sameAs 1995492795 @default.
• W1995492795 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W1995492795 countsByYear W19954927952016 @default.
• W1995492795 countsByYear W19954927952018 @default.
• W1995492795 countsByYear W19954927952019 @default.
• W1995492795 countsByYear W19954927952020 @default.
• W1995492795 countsByYear W19954927952021 @default.
• W1995492795 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1995492795 hasAuthorship W1995492795A5049142005 @default.
• W1995492795 hasAuthorship W1995492795A5084766489 @default.
• W1995492795 hasBestOaLocation W19954927951 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConcept C126255220 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConcept C147203929 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConcept C206729178 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConcept C22088475 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConcept C44154836 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConceptScore W1995492795C126255220 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConceptScore W1995492795C127413603 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConceptScore W1995492795C147203929 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConceptScore W1995492795C206729178 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConceptScore W1995492795C21547014 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConceptScore W1995492795C22088475 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConceptScore W1995492795C33923547 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConceptScore W1995492795C41008148 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConceptScore W1995492795C42475967 @default.
• W1995492795 hasConceptScore W1995492795C44154836 @default.
• W1995492795 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1995492795 hasLocation W19954927951 @default.
• W1995492795 hasLocation W19954927952 @default.
• W1995492795 hasLocation W19954927953 @default.
• W1995492795 hasLocation W19954927954 @default.
• W1995492795 hasOpenAccess W1995492795 @default.
• W1995492795 hasPrimaryLocation W19954927951 @default.
• W1995492795 hasRelatedWork W1586577474 @default.
• W1995492795 hasRelatedWork W1975385082 @default.
• W1995492795 hasRelatedWork W1992428501 @default.
• W1995492795 hasRelatedWork W2038592628 @default.
• W1995492795 hasRelatedWork W2050205890 @default.
• W1995492795 hasRelatedWork W2153938529 @default.
• W1995492795 hasRelatedWork W2517591200 @default.
• W1995492795 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1995492795 hasRelatedWork W4251479060 @default.
• W1995492795 hasRelatedWork W2408787783 @default.
• W1995492795 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W1995492795 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1995492795 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1995492795 magId "1995492795" @default.
• W1995492795 workType "article" @default.