FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1996092012> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1996092012 endingPage "e408" @default.
• W1996092012 startingPage "e407" @default.
• W1996092012 abstract "It truly is a brave new world, with new ways to measure the impact of scholarly work emerging almost minute by minute. Three new items might be of particular interest to you, as fellow writers and researchers. Presentations were made about these new items at the recent International Academy of Nursing Editors meeting. ORCID is the Open Researcher and Contributors ID repository. Registration is free at www.orcid.org website. Once one has registered, almost all, if not all of the author's publication citations appear, along with doi numbers (a gift in and of itself!). The ORCID number is basically one's own personal DOI number, as an author or researcher. For an example, click on mine, to see what it looks like: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5794-4075. My SCOPUS ID number then appeared (I did not know I had one) and was also saved in this repository. The author has control over access to the information, and is able to elect public, limited, or private access to the citations listed here. ORCID is a not-for-profit organization currently funded by more than 280 organizations including academic institutions, publishers, and scholarly societies. One of the major goals is to clearly identify authors. Authors with unusual last names are not hard to identify but a Smith, Jones, Kim, Park, or Lee can be a challenge for publishers, researchers, and others. Go online to learn more about this and see if you are interested in listing yourself. The H-index, 2013H-index: What is it and how to find yours. (2013). Benchfly blog. Retrieved August, 4, 2013 from http://www.benchfly.com/blog/h-index-what-it-is-and-how-to-find-yours/Google Scholar is an individual author metric, rather than article metric. It useful for authors when publishing papers in journals that do not have impact factors, such as Clinical Simulation in Nursing. Two numbers are used to calculate the H-index—the total number of papers published and the number of citations for each paper. For example, two papers published, two citations per paper, the H-index is 2. The weakness of the H-index is that it counts the citation, not whether the citations was saying good or bad things about the paper. The more papers one publishes, the more opportunity for citations exist, thus the H-index favors seasoned authors. Authors with publications in Elsevier journals receive periodic emails indicating that they have been cited and a calculated H-index. This might be something useful to include in a tenure and promotion packet. For more information, see http://www.benchfly.com/blog/h-index-what-it-is-and-how-to-find-yours/. There are new ways of measuring scholarly impact emerging in the world of publishing and author recognition. The term “altmetrics” has been around for fewer than 3 years (Taylor and Kamalski, 2012Taylor, M., & Kamalski, J. (2012). The changing face of journal metrics. Elsevier Editors's Update, 37, October.Google Scholar). It encompasses the world of social media chatter about articles and authors and ideas, in addition to HTML and PDF downloads of articles. For example, the proprietary www.altmetrics provides the number of times an article has been mentioned on social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, or bookmarked in a site such as Mendeley. A color coded “donut” indicating what social media is citing a paper accompanies an article linked to this medium. The Altmetrics donut and data has appeared a few times when I have been searching for items. A similar site is www.impactstory.it; it is free and provides readers with more information about how this world is developing and how it may be of use to authors in the future. These metrics have the potential to provide “canary in the coal pile”–level information about the impact of an article or idea, because they may appear within weeks or months, rather than the years required for citation data to start accumulating. The H-index and emerging altmetrics, coupled with the more common journal impact factors, will provide a more well-rounded and immediate picture of an author or researcher's impact in the field as these metrics become more common place. The wide acceptance of the impact factor took many years. Bibliometric researchers suggest that the adoption of these emerging metrics will be much faster." @default.
• W1996092012 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1996092012 creator A5045380317 @default.
• W1996092012 date "2013-10-01" @default.
• W1996092012 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1996092012 title "Notes from the International Academy of Nursing Editors Meeting" @default.
• W1996092012 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.08.001" @default.
• W1996092012 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1996092012 type Work @default.
• W1996092012 sameAs 1996092012 @default.
• W1996092012 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W1996092012 countsByYear W19960920122018 @default.
• W1996092012 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1996092012 hasAuthorship W1996092012A5045380317 @default.
• W1996092012 hasBestOaLocation W19960920121 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConcept C2777382242 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConcept C2779820595 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConcept C3020068454 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConceptScore W1996092012C10138342 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConceptScore W1996092012C136764020 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConceptScore W1996092012C144133560 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConceptScore W1996092012C161191863 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConceptScore W1996092012C17744445 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConceptScore W1996092012C199539241 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConceptScore W1996092012C2777382242 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConceptScore W1996092012C2779473830 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConceptScore W1996092012C2779820595 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConceptScore W1996092012C3020068454 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConceptScore W1996092012C39549134 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConceptScore W1996092012C41008148 @default.
• W1996092012 hasConceptScore W1996092012C83867959 @default.
• W1996092012 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W1996092012 hasLocation W19960920121 @default.
• W1996092012 hasOpenAccess W1996092012 @default.
• W1996092012 hasPrimaryLocation W19960920121 @default.
• W1996092012 hasRelatedWork W1991574832 @default.
• W1996092012 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1996092012 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1996092012 hasRelatedWork W3032201375 @default.
• W1996092012 hasRelatedWork W4205263838 @default.
• W1996092012 hasRelatedWork W4231733281 @default.
• W1996092012 hasRelatedWork W4238135496 @default.
• W1996092012 hasRelatedWork W4242111724 @default.
• W1996092012 hasRelatedWork W4245601300 @default.
• W1996092012 hasRelatedWork W600447522 @default.
• W1996092012 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W1996092012 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1996092012 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1996092012 magId "1996092012" @default.
• W1996092012 workType "article" @default.