FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1996374803> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1996374803 endingPage "149" @default.
• W1996374803 startingPage "141" @default.
• W1996374803 abstract "Mammalian predator foraging behavior is an important, but understudied determinant of avian nest success. Predator behavior may also affect the nest-site selection decisions of females: when predators respond strongly to prey density (e.g. through area-restricted search), the optimal strategy may be for birds to disperse their nests widely across the landscape. Conversely, clustered nests may benefit from dilution effects in the presence of incidental nest predators. In dabbling ducks, nest distributions range from clustered to dispersed and there is conflicting evidence about whether clustering enhances or reduces nest success, although presumably this depends on predator behavior. Here, I present results from an agent-based model designed to answer two qualitative questions: are clustered nests more or less successful than dispersed nests, and how does that relative benefit vary depending on predator behavior? I modeled three types of waterfowl nest predators (to emulate the foraging behavior of skunks and foxes) that differ in their degree of spatial memory and their capacity for area-restricted search, foraging on different distributions of nests. As hypothesized, well-dispersed nests survived better with fox-like predators that performed area-restricted searches. On the other hand, clustered nests survived better when incidental skunk-like predators were present, but survival was dramatically reduced in the presence of foxes; thus, small changes in the predator community (e.g. introduction of foxes) without commensurate changes in nest clustering could have important effects on waterfowl populations. On simulated landscapes containing both clustered and dispersed nests and a mixed predator community, average nest success for clustered versus randomly placed nests was the same across possible predator mixes, but the variance in success for clustered nests was much higher; this suggests that there may be risk-reward tradeoffs when nesting near conspecifics. That said, the degree to which ducks can actually assess and respond to the presence of conspecifics is largely unknown, and it is believed that nest sites are selected based on habitat. Results from this model, combined with empirical data suggest that commonly used management strategies that promote nest clustering, such as restoration of small parcels of habitat, can actually create ecological traps for nesting ducks, driven by predator behavior." @default.
• W1996374803 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1996374803 creator A5034664728 @default.
• W1996374803 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W1996374803 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W1996374803 title "Predator foraging behavior and patterns of avian nest success: What can we learn from an agent-based model?" @default.
• W1996374803 cites W1496693579 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W1510242715 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W1527082643 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W1585601819 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W1884313815 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W1970495326 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W1981479756 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W1985471881 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W1986346905 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2000928657 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2001041107 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2006012747 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2009331649 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2009896430 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2015555130 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2016561352 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2018993812 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2025235883 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2027515295 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2030324477 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2030642211 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2030935338 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2035125882 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2036792072 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2040526942 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2041293157 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2045246251 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2049164421 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2063617483 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2064216185 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2066620167 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2066682824 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2071783880 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2074045521 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2075566446 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2077337721 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2080344462 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2080787120 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2090878948 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2090930298 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2095097660 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2104489839 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2114975481 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2125538779 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2141123870 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2142617414 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2145139936 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2145408484 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2146955965 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2151264130 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2166941999 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2174419508 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2177140945 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2178642041 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2221543984 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2315129417 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2321993650 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2327093761 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2328347306 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2330313519 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2334803344 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W2971141471 @default.
• W1996374803 cites W4249381599 @default.
• W1996374803 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.09.028" @default.
• W1996374803 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1996374803 type Work @default.
• W1996374803 sameAs 1996374803 @default.
• W1996374803 citedByCount "30" @default.
• W1996374803 countsByYear W19963748032014 @default.
• W1996374803 countsByYear W19963748032015 @default.
• W1996374803 countsByYear W19963748032016 @default.
• W1996374803 countsByYear W19963748032017 @default.
• W1996374803 countsByYear W19963748032018 @default.
• W1996374803 countsByYear W19963748032019 @default.
• W1996374803 countsByYear W19963748032020 @default.
• W1996374803 countsByYear W19963748032021 @default.
• W1996374803 countsByYear W19963748032022 @default.
• W1996374803 countsByYear W19963748032023 @default.
• W1996374803 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1996374803 hasAuthorship W1996374803A5034664728 @default.
• W1996374803 hasConcept C152630561 @default.
• W1996374803 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W1996374803 hasConcept C165287380 @default.
• W1996374803 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W1996374803 hasConcept C188382862 @default.
• W1996374803 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1996374803 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W1996374803 hasConcept C204323151 @default.
• W1996374803 hasConcept C2776834261 @default.
• W1996374803 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W1996374803 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1996374803 hasConcept C96857902 @default.

• next