FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1996431704> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1996431704 endingPage "341" @default.
• W1996431704 startingPage "331" @default.
• W1996431704 abstract "The Ross operation is being identified as the ideal aortic valve replacement for children and young adults.’ As the use of this operation has increased and as postoperative echocardiographic surveillance has become routine, an incidence of late autograft valve insufficiency has been noted. In some patients this has been progressive and reoperation on the autograft valve with either repair or replacement has been required. Careful longitudinal follow-up has documented that preoperative diagnosis of aortic insufficiency, performance of the Ross operation as a scalloped subcoronary implant or an inclusion cylinder rather than a root replacement, and limited operative experience are associated with an increased incidence of autograft valve failure or the development of 2 + aortic insufficiency.* Patients with significant dilatation of the aortic annulus have not been considered candidates for the Ross operation because the disparity between the aortic annulus and the size of the pulmonary valve can lead to autograft valve insufficiency and early valve failure. Also, in patients in whom an intraaortic implantation technique (scalloped subcoronary or inclusion cylinder) was used, marked discrepancy between the sinotubular dimension of the aorta and of the pulmonary root has been associated with early valve fail~re.~.~ Children and young adults with a bicuspid aortic valve and aortic valve insufficiency with dilatation of the aortic annulus and ascending aorta or aneurysms of the ascending aorta were being denied the benefits of this operation.2 Modification of the Ross operation or additional procedures needed to be developed so that this constellation of pathology could be effectively treated ant1 these patients could have a Ross operation. Initial attempts at our institution, using an external cuff of dacron, were successful in most patients but did not produce a predictable decrease in aortic annulus size and prevent early autograft valve dysfunction in some patients.**”’ A reproducible operative technique that was adaptable to all ages and patient sizes as well as aortic valve and aortic annulus pathology was our goal. An important issue is: if the aortic annulus is to be reduced, what is the appropriate size for an individual patient? The pulmonary valve annulus is not similar to the aortic valve annulus and its size is dependent on preload and right ventricular pressure. In vitro measurements of the pulmonary valve annulus, after mobilization of the pulmonary artery and valve from the right ventricular outflow tract at the time of a Ross operation, show that the pulmonary valve annulus will passively dilate to almost any size. Because of the inherent difficulty in determining the “normal” size of the pulmonary valve annulus and recognizing that the pulmonary artery and its contained valve function very well as an aortic valve and root in patients with a normal” aortic annulus size, we have focused on adjusting the aortic valve annulus to a size that is appropriate for the patient’s body size and “fixing” the aortic annulus at that size. It has been our belief that by restoring the aortic annulus size and preventing subsequent dilatation, patients with a significantly dilated aortic annulus and patients with ascending aortic pathology can have a successful Ross operation. The longterm results should he similar to the results obtained in patients who have aortic valve disease without dilatation of their annulus. David et al“ have also identified an increased incidence of autograft valve insufficiency and autograft valve failure in patients with mismatch of the aortic" @default.
• W1996431704 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1996431704 creator A5038457163 @default.
• W1996431704 date "1997-11-01" @default.
• W1996431704 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1996431704 title "The Ross Operation in Patients With Dilation of the Aortic Annulus and of the Ascending Aorta" @default.
• W1996431704 cites W1954721966 @default.
• W1996431704 cites W1969399036 @default.
• W1996431704 cites W1990175707 @default.
• W1996431704 cites W1996141614 @default.
• W1996431704 cites W1998118375 @default.
• W1996431704 cites W2012329425 @default.
• W1996431704 cites W2023369747 @default.
• W1996431704 cites W2033698585 @default.
• W1996431704 cites W2040749098 @default.
• W1996431704 cites W2095674593 @default.
• W1996431704 cites W2338603083 @default.
• W1996431704 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1085-5637(07)70071-2" @default.
• W1996431704 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
• W1996431704 type Work @default.
• W1996431704 sameAs 1996431704 @default.
• W1996431704 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W1996431704 countsByYear W19964317042012 @default.
• W1996431704 countsByYear W19964317042015 @default.
• W1996431704 countsByYear W19964317042022 @default.
• W1996431704 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1996431704 hasAuthorship W1996431704A5038457163 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConcept C150936888 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConcept C176752191 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConcept C2778249958 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConcept C2779980429 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConcept C2780757906 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConcept C2993369777 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConceptScore W1996431704C114614502 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConceptScore W1996431704C126322002 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConceptScore W1996431704C150936888 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConceptScore W1996431704C159985019 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConceptScore W1996431704C164705383 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConceptScore W1996431704C176752191 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConceptScore W1996431704C192562407 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConceptScore W1996431704C2778249958 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConceptScore W1996431704C2779980429 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConceptScore W1996431704C2780757906 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConceptScore W1996431704C2993369777 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConceptScore W1996431704C33923547 @default.
• W1996431704 hasConceptScore W1996431704C71924100 @default.
• W1996431704 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1996431704 hasLocation W19964317041 @default.
• W1996431704 hasOpenAccess W1996431704 @default.
• W1996431704 hasPrimaryLocation W19964317041 @default.
• W1996431704 hasRelatedWork W1784619172 @default.
• W1996431704 hasRelatedWork W1984993856 @default.
• W1996431704 hasRelatedWork W1996431704 @default.
• W1996431704 hasRelatedWork W2017968335 @default.
• W1996431704 hasRelatedWork W2018112652 @default.
• W1996431704 hasRelatedWork W2019503226 @default.
• W1996431704 hasRelatedWork W2034011323 @default.
• W1996431704 hasRelatedWork W2127346359 @default.
• W1996431704 hasRelatedWork W2797212170 @default.
• W1996431704 hasRelatedWork W4221127636 @default.
• W1996431704 hasVolume "2" @default.
• W1996431704 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1996431704 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1996431704 magId "1996431704" @default.
• W1996431704 workType "article" @default.