FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1996684410> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1996684410 endingPage "272" @default.
• W1996684410 startingPage "265" @default.
• W1996684410 abstract "Abstract Background Non‐ablative fractional resurfacing (NAFR) has been reported in case studies as an effective treatment for surgical and burn scars [Behroozan et al., J Cosmet Laser Ther 2006; 8(1):35–38; Haedersdal et al., Lasers Surg Med 2009; 41(3):189–195; Waibel and Beer, J Drugs Dermatol 2008; 7(1):59–61; Niwa et al., Dermatol Surg 2009; 35(5):773–777; discussion 777–778; and Tierney et al., Dermatol Surg 2009; 35(8):1172–1180]. We have performed a prospective, randomized controlled study with two different treatment arms to better characterize the response of hypertrophic scars to NAFR. Study Design We conducted a prospective, controlled trial on linear, surgical hypertrophic scars 6 months or older in age. Subjects were randomized into two treatment arms of NAFR: (a) high‐density treatment arm (HDTA): 40 mJ and percent coverage of 26% and (b) low‐density treatment arm (LDTA): 40 mJ and percent coverage of 14%. One‐half of the scar was treated every 2 weeks for a total of four treatments, with subsequent follow‐up visits at 1 month and 3 months. Scar improvement was judged as compared to the untreated side by the subjects and two blinded observers using a four‐point scale (0 = no improvement or worsening, 1 = minor improvement, 2 = moderate improvement, and 3 = marked improvement). Volumetric changes were also measured for a select group ( n = 4) by measuring scar casts with optical frequency domain imaging. Patient satisfaction was surveyed at the end of the trial. Side effects in both treatment arms were assessed. Results Twenty patients were enrolled, of which 17 subjects noted improvement in their scars compared to untreated side. Three subjects in the HDTA rated their scars as having a worsened appearance at the end of the study. After treatment was completed, scars continued to improve in appearance at 3 months compared to 1 month. Subjects in the LDTA rated the treated side with higher scores, than subjects in the HDTA ( P = 0.001). Scars <2 years old tended to respond better to NAFR as compared to scars >6 years old. The side effects profile was more severe in the HDTA group. Nevertheless, all subjects were satisfied with the procedure at trial completion. Conclusions This study demonstrates the efficacy of NAFR for treating hypertrophic scars. Low‐density treatment is at least as effective as the high‐density treatment and with fewer side effects. The study also suggests that younger scars respond better to NAFR. Thus, early intervention may be key in the treatment of hypertrophic scars. Lasers Surg. Med. 43:265–272, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc." @default.
• W1996684410 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1996684410 creator A5021043674 @default.
• W1996684410 creator A5045225089 @default.
• W1996684410 creator A5054885707 @default.
• W1996684410 creator A5069075055 @default.
• W1996684410 creator A5080827838 @default.
• W1996684410 date "2011-04-01" @default.
• W1996684410 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W1996684410 title "A prospective, randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of fractional photothermolysis on scar remodeling" @default.
• W1996684410 cites W1973258558 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W1979037468 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W1980273792 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W1997481965 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2006305811 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2006517775 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2018085404 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2019868363 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2020318070 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2024294423 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2026258466 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2029734142 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2034152418 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2039186227 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2041184731 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2041210626 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2043778734 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2051422443 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2052842827 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2056397249 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2056711470 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2062714345 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2066582586 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2079002857 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2105970666 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2114189334 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2122265366 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2123566993 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2126293684 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2129079484 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2137561034 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2161423477 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2169164374 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2170904481 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W2335054972 @default.
• W1996684410 cites W4380869259 @default.
• W1996684410 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.21061" @default.
• W1996684410 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21500220" @default.
• W1996684410 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W1996684410 type Work @default.
• W1996684410 sameAs 1996684410 @default.
• W1996684410 citedByCount "46" @default.
• W1996684410 countsByYear W19966844102012 @default.
• W1996684410 countsByYear W19966844102013 @default.
• W1996684410 countsByYear W19966844102014 @default.
• W1996684410 countsByYear W19966844102015 @default.
• W1996684410 countsByYear W19966844102016 @default.
• W1996684410 countsByYear W19966844102017 @default.
• W1996684410 countsByYear W19966844102018 @default.
• W1996684410 countsByYear W19966844102019 @default.
• W1996684410 countsByYear W19966844102020 @default.
• W1996684410 countsByYear W19966844102021 @default.
• W1996684410 countsByYear W19966844102022 @default.
• W1996684410 countsByYear W19966844102023 @default.
• W1996684410 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1996684410 hasAuthorship W1996684410A5021043674 @default.
• W1996684410 hasAuthorship W1996684410A5045225089 @default.
• W1996684410 hasAuthorship W1996684410A5054885707 @default.
• W1996684410 hasAuthorship W1996684410A5069075055 @default.
• W1996684410 hasAuthorship W1996684410A5080827838 @default.
• W1996684410 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1996684410 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W1996684410 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W1996684410 hasConcept C2777642821 @default.
• W1996684410 hasConcept C2778698245 @default.
• W1996684410 hasConcept C3019227704 @default.
• W1996684410 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1996684410 hasConceptScore W1996684410C141071460 @default.
• W1996684410 hasConceptScore W1996684410C168563851 @default.
• W1996684410 hasConceptScore W1996684410C188816634 @default.
• W1996684410 hasConceptScore W1996684410C2777642821 @default.
• W1996684410 hasConceptScore W1996684410C2778698245 @default.
• W1996684410 hasConceptScore W1996684410C3019227704 @default.
• W1996684410 hasConceptScore W1996684410C71924100 @default.
• W1996684410 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1996684410 hasLocation W19966844101 @default.
• W1996684410 hasLocation W19966844102 @default.
• W1996684410 hasOpenAccess W1996684410 @default.
• W1996684410 hasPrimaryLocation W19966844101 @default.
• W1996684410 hasRelatedWork W2086411372 @default.
• W1996684410 hasRelatedWork W2088312076 @default.
• W1996684410 hasRelatedWork W2173877571 @default.
• W1996684410 hasRelatedWork W2322465317 @default.
• W1996684410 hasRelatedWork W2353503117 @default.
• W1996684410 hasRelatedWork W2353972822 @default.
• W1996684410 hasRelatedWork W2997600033 @default.
• W1996684410 hasRelatedWork W3029136108 @default.
• W1996684410 hasRelatedWork W3031727326 @default.

• next