FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1996688383> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1996688383 endingPage "1022" @default.
• W1996688383 startingPage "1019" @default.
• W1996688383 abstract "Summary.-90 subjects were asked to reproduce four criterion movements of either 5 or 30 un terminating at one of three locations: 30 un to the right of the subject's midline, on the subject's midline, and 30 un to the left of the subject's midline. The mean constant errors for groups reflected the overshooting and undershooting of short and long sequences typical of the range effect. Significant reductions in constant error were observed over trials. Analysis of the variable error indicated the recall of shorter sequences to be more consistent than that of longer sequences. Longer movement reproduccions were most variable when the terminal position was to the right of the midline. Concerning graded psitioning responses, the range effect is described as the tendency to overshoot criterion when the movement to be reproduced is short and to undershoot criterion when the movement to be reproduced is long. Interest in this phenomenon dates back to the turn of the century when investigators became interested in isolating the indifference point, that is, the movement extent at which there was no constant error of estimation. Hollingworth (1909) presented evidence that such a point did not exist in an absolute sense but that the response characteristics of a given movement were a function of the subject's prior movement experiences. Interest in range effects increased again in the post-war years when psychologists became involved in the design of control devices for military and civilian equipment (cf. Ellson & Wheeler, 1947; Brown, Knauft, & Rosenbaum, 1948). Current interest has been spurred by the observation of the phenomenon in experiments concerning the short-term retention of motoric information (Keele & Ells, 1972; Adams & Dijkstra, 1966; Trumbo, Milone, & Noble, 1972) and also its inclusion in the theoretical explanations of the memory process (Laabs, 1973; Pepper & Herman, 1970). The present smdy was undertaken to clarify further the nature of the range effect phenomenon. While investigating the role of proactive inhibition in short-term motor memory, Schmidt and Ascoli (1970) observed the reproduction of movements terminating near the center line of the subject's body to be underestimated less than those terminated to the extreme right or left. This effect was significant, indicating the character of the reproduction response to be least partially a function of the position at which the criterion movement was terminated. The purpose of this experiment was to examine" @default.
• W1996688383 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1996688383 creator A5025043419 @default.
• W1996688383 creator A5084132163 @default.
• W1996688383 date "1980-06-01" @default.
• W1996688383 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1996688383 title "EXTENT OF MOVEMENT, TERMINAL POSITION, AND PRACTICE AS DETERMINANTS OF THE RANGE EFFECT" @default.
• W1996688383 cites W1964356608 @default.
• W1996688383 cites W1964985966 @default.
• W1996688383 cites W2073237163 @default.
• W1996688383 doi "https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1980.50.3.1019" @default.
• W1996688383 hasPublicationYear "1980" @default.
• W1996688383 type Work @default.
• W1996688383 sameAs 1996688383 @default.
• W1996688383 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W1996688383 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1996688383 hasAuthorship W1996688383A5025043419 @default.
• W1996688383 hasAuthorship W1996688383A5084132163 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConcept C198082294 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConcept C204323151 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConcept C2779664074 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConcept C2780226923 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConceptScore W1996688383C10138342 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConceptScore W1996688383C107038049 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConceptScore W1996688383C127413603 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConceptScore W1996688383C142362112 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConceptScore W1996688383C146978453 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConceptScore W1996688383C15744967 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConceptScore W1996688383C162324750 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConceptScore W1996688383C198082294 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConceptScore W1996688383C204323151 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConceptScore W1996688383C2779664074 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConceptScore W1996688383C2780226923 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConceptScore W1996688383C41008148 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConceptScore W1996688383C46312422 @default.
• W1996688383 hasConceptScore W1996688383C76155785 @default.
• W1996688383 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1996688383 hasLocation W19966883831 @default.
• W1996688383 hasOpenAccess W1996688383 @default.
• W1996688383 hasPrimaryLocation W19966883831 @default.
• W1996688383 hasRelatedWork W13873483 @default.
• W1996688383 hasRelatedWork W2065339117 @default.
• W1996688383 hasRelatedWork W2127703805 @default.
• W1996688383 hasRelatedWork W2322094584 @default.
• W1996688383 hasRelatedWork W2322771205 @default.
• W1996688383 hasRelatedWork W2347361764 @default.
• W1996688383 hasRelatedWork W2372650111 @default.
• W1996688383 hasRelatedWork W2378567585 @default.
• W1996688383 hasRelatedWork W260210897 @default.
• W1996688383 hasRelatedWork W4323271774 @default.
• W1996688383 hasVolume "50" @default.
• W1996688383 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1996688383 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1996688383 magId "1996688383" @default.
• W1996688383 workType "article" @default.