FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1996917992> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1996917992 endingPage "1154" @default.
• W1996917992 startingPage "1150" @default.
• W1996917992 abstract "Purpose The goal of this study was to assess subjective patient recovery of donor site sensory deficit following sural nerve harvest for trigeminal nerve repair surgery. Patients and Methods A review of 42 consecutive sural nerve graft patient records yielded 26 patients, at least 20 months following sural nerve grafting for trigeminal nerve repair, who participated in a telephone questionnaire survey to assess subjective outcomes. The association between donor site outcome and other factors, including nerve graft recovery, age, gender, pain, cold sensitivity, scar cosmesis and tactile sensitivity, and legal involvement were analyzed, and presurgical and present levels of donor and nerve graft site sensibility were compared. Results The perceived area of donor site sensory deficit decreased significantly over time. Postoperative donor site pain and cold sensitivity at low levels were reported by few patients, and the majority have completely resolved. Most patients reported no problems with scar cosmesis or pain. There was a moderate agreement between donor site recovery and nerve graft recovery (κ = 0.32). Few patients reported satisfaction with one site and not the other or complete dissatisfaction with both sites. Other factors such as age, gender, or legal involvement were not found to correlate with satisfaction level. Conclusions The use of a questionnaire for subjective assessment of neurosensory recovery following nerve graft repair yields outcomes information that is generally not considered in the traditional clinical patient assessment. The majority of patients tolerate sural nerve harvest without significant donor site morbidity. The goal of this study was to assess subjective patient recovery of donor site sensory deficit following sural nerve harvest for trigeminal nerve repair surgery. A review of 42 consecutive sural nerve graft patient records yielded 26 patients, at least 20 months following sural nerve grafting for trigeminal nerve repair, who participated in a telephone questionnaire survey to assess subjective outcomes. The association between donor site outcome and other factors, including nerve graft recovery, age, gender, pain, cold sensitivity, scar cosmesis and tactile sensitivity, and legal involvement were analyzed, and presurgical and present levels of donor and nerve graft site sensibility were compared. The perceived area of donor site sensory deficit decreased significantly over time. Postoperative donor site pain and cold sensitivity at low levels were reported by few patients, and the majority have completely resolved. Most patients reported no problems with scar cosmesis or pain. There was a moderate agreement between donor site recovery and nerve graft recovery (κ = 0.32). Few patients reported satisfaction with one site and not the other or complete dissatisfaction with both sites. Other factors such as age, gender, or legal involvement were not found to correlate with satisfaction level. The use of a questionnaire for subjective assessment of neurosensory recovery following nerve graft repair yields outcomes information that is generally not considered in the traditional clinical patient assessment. The majority of patients tolerate sural nerve harvest without significant donor site morbidity." @default.
• W1996917992 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1996917992 creator A5006151419 @default.
• W1996917992 creator A5076764392 @default.
• W1996917992 date "2005-08-01" @default.
• W1996917992 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1996917992 title "Subjective Outcomes Following Sural Nerve Harvest" @default.
• W1996917992 cites W1980531021 @default.
• W1996917992 cites W1991667652 @default.
• W1996917992 cites W2037981542 @default.
• W1996917992 cites W2038550012 @default.
• W1996917992 cites W2043098895 @default.
• W1996917992 cites W2052203860 @default.
• W1996917992 cites W2086066683 @default.
• W1996917992 cites W2089377332 @default.
• W1996917992 cites W2095324126 @default.
• W1996917992 cites W2135403826 @default.
• W1996917992 cites W2273377955 @default.
• W1996917992 cites W2415595221 @default.
• W1996917992 cites W2418036065 @default.
• W1996917992 cites W76117812 @default.
• W1996917992 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.04.031" @default.
• W1996917992 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16094583" @default.
• W1996917992 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W1996917992 type Work @default.
• W1996917992 sameAs 1996917992 @default.
• W1996917992 citedByCount "51" @default.
• W1996917992 countsByYear W19969179922012 @default.
• W1996917992 countsByYear W19969179922013 @default.
• W1996917992 countsByYear W19969179922014 @default.
• W1996917992 countsByYear W19969179922015 @default.
• W1996917992 countsByYear W19969179922016 @default.
• W1996917992 countsByYear W19969179922017 @default.
• W1996917992 countsByYear W19969179922018 @default.
• W1996917992 countsByYear W19969179922019 @default.
• W1996917992 countsByYear W19969179922020 @default.
• W1996917992 countsByYear W19969179922021 @default.
• W1996917992 countsByYear W19969179922023 @default.
• W1996917992 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1996917992 hasAuthorship W1996917992A5006151419 @default.
• W1996917992 hasAuthorship W1996917992A5076764392 @default.
• W1996917992 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1996917992 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W1996917992 hasConcept C2777397368 @default.
• W1996917992 hasConcept C2780923182 @default.
• W1996917992 hasConcept C2780943399 @default.
• W1996917992 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W1996917992 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1996917992 hasConceptScore W1996917992C141071460 @default.
• W1996917992 hasConceptScore W1996917992C2775944032 @default.
• W1996917992 hasConceptScore W1996917992C2777397368 @default.
• W1996917992 hasConceptScore W1996917992C2780923182 @default.
• W1996917992 hasConceptScore W1996917992C2780943399 @default.
• W1996917992 hasConceptScore W1996917992C42219234 @default.
• W1996917992 hasConceptScore W1996917992C71924100 @default.
• W1996917992 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W1996917992 hasLocation W19969179921 @default.
• W1996917992 hasLocation W19969179922 @default.
• W1996917992 hasOpenAccess W1996917992 @default.
• W1996917992 hasPrimaryLocation W19969179921 @default.
• W1996917992 hasRelatedWork W1996917992 @default.
• W1996917992 hasRelatedWork W2024132637 @default.
• W1996917992 hasRelatedWork W2049676426 @default.
• W1996917992 hasRelatedWork W2056461985 @default.
• W1996917992 hasRelatedWork W2099412153 @default.
• W1996917992 hasRelatedWork W2155236382 @default.
• W1996917992 hasRelatedWork W2332104889 @default.
• W1996917992 hasRelatedWork W2460403331 @default.
• W1996917992 hasRelatedWork W2562569221 @default.
• W1996917992 hasRelatedWork W4380048258 @default.
• W1996917992 hasVolume "63" @default.
• W1996917992 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1996917992 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1996917992 magId "1996917992" @default.
• W1996917992 workType "article" @default.