FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1996942012> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1996942012 endingPage "64" @default.
• W1996942012 startingPage "57" @default.
• W1996942012 abstract "Purpose of review With increasing adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques in urologic oncology, the efficacy, safety, and adequacy of lymphadenectomy were reviewed for studies about prostate, bladder, kidney, upper tract urothelial, testicular, and penile cancer published in the past 18 months. Recent findings In prostate cancer, in which robotic prostatectomy has become the predominant approach, use of extended lymphadenectomy has increased with lymph node yield nearing 20. Minimally invasive lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer does not yet approach the yield seen at high-volume open cystectomy centers, but a larger proportion of robotic lymph node dissections surpass the oncologic threshold of 10–14 lymph nodes compared with open surgery. Comparative lymphadenectomy data for kidney and upper tract urothelial cancers remain muddled as routine lymphadenectomy is not performed and both open and laparoscopic/robotic nephroureterectomy carry no consensus on templates. Minimally invasive retroperitoneal lymph node dissection carries safety and oncologic equivalence to the open technique only in limited centers, whereas minimally invasive ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer remains exploratory at this time. Summary Findings from the prior year suggest that – in high-volume centers – lymph node dissection for urologic cancers is equivalent between open and minimally invasive techniques in lymph node yield and short-term to medium-term oncologic results." @default.
• W1996942012 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1996942012 creator A5012605582 @default.
• W1996942012 creator A5079895193 @default.
• W1996942012 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W1996942012 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1996942012 title "Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open lymphadenectomy in urological cancers" @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1488652746 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1546760566 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1571292566 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1580306922 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1583376977 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1606286286 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1715541821 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1795642782 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1795855832 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1831174980 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1968716231 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1970259646 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1971611457 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1971920540 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1975114513 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1975243711 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1975569572 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1977301385 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1980232773 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1980536257 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1984836574 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1990483376 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W1999056415 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2000301953 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2003059467 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2003669872 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2005313524 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2006870797 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2007429496 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2008357049 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2008911129 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2017634789 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2021056489 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2023289791 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2026375718 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2026439606 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2026874887 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2027848296 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2034765690 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2040510002 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2043391187 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2043494712 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2046248435 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2049574465 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2054464819 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2062039294 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2070439204 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2081300216 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2082570982 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2084015754 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2085689874 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2086810954 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2088519902 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2094668081 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2094713934 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2098834830 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2099606826 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2106341092 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2114930703 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2123051888 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2125837480 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2129899774 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2131409834 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2133092139 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2141633468 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2147437793 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2155603031 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2156366443 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2159366134 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2165036089 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2169175282 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2170371818 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2327960029 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2410890061 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2412735799 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W2417757794 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W3141245580 @default.
• W1996942012 cites W49263098 @default.
• W1996942012 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0b013e32835af286" @default.
• W1996942012 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23202287" @default.
• W1996942012 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1996942012 type Work @default.
• W1996942012 sameAs 1996942012 @default.
• W1996942012 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W1996942012 countsByYear W19969420122014 @default.
• W1996942012 countsByYear W19969420122015 @default.
• W1996942012 countsByYear W19969420122019 @default.
• W1996942012 countsByYear W19969420122020 @default.
• W1996942012 countsByYear W19969420122021 @default.
• W1996942012 countsByYear W19969420122022 @default.
• W1996942012 countsByYear W19969420122023 @default.

• next