FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1997522012> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1997522012 endingPage "117" @default.
• W1997522012 startingPage "114" @default.
• W1997522012 abstract "Laparoscopic surgery has been widely studied in colorectal cancer and its feasibility and safety have been proven to the extent that in the UK a national laparoscopic colorectal surgery programme has been established. The advantages of laparoscopic surgery have been studied less systematically in diverticular disease. Several prospective uncontrolled studies have demonstrated that laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease is feasible with low morbidity and mortality rates. A large population study in the USA has demonstrated elective laparoscopic surgery for diverticular disease to have reduced hospital stay by 1 day, and a lower rate of intra-operative and post-operative complications over open surgery. Some of the reported differences may be attributable to selection bias of more complex cases to open surgery. A Cochrane systematic review examining 11 non-randomized and 1 randomized study showed laparoscopic surgery to be feasible in diverticular disease, although there might be a higher minor complications rate in laparoscopic resections. Attention has been focused on surgical techniques as means to reduce complications. There is a belief that preservation of the inferior mesenteric and superior rectal artery protects from anastomotic leak, but a study from the USA looking into that point did not find a difference. The application of hand-assisted laparoscopy seems to help cope with complex diverticular masses and colovesical fistulas. New hybrid techniques incorporating specimen extraction via rectum may reduce complications further. Single incision laparoscopic surgery has recently been shown to be feasible. Although minimally invasive techniques appear superior in terms of early outcomes than open surgery the choice of minimally invasive technique seems to be less relevant to outcomes if accompanied by an appropriate level of surgical experience and expertise. Patient-related factors such as comorbidities or degree of disease complexity are more likely to be related to complication rates." @default.
• W1997522012 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1997522012 creator A5072262486 @default.
• W1997522012 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W1997522012 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1997522012 title "Differences in Early Outcomes after Open or Laparoscopic Surgery: What Is the Evidence?" @default.
• W1997522012 cites W1975706282 @default.
• W1997522012 cites W1995297662 @default.
• W1997522012 cites W1996016100 @default.
• W1997522012 cites W2001357889 @default.
• W1997522012 cites W2016188782 @default.
• W1997522012 cites W2027386110 @default.
• W1997522012 cites W2031926188 @default.
• W1997522012 cites W2054455012 @default.
• W1997522012 cites W2081192614 @default.
• W1997522012 cites W2087262499 @default.
• W1997522012 cites W2098291683 @default.
• W1997522012 cites W2153240402 @default.
• W1997522012 cites W2153673865 @default.
• W1997522012 doi "https://doi.org/10.1159/000335916" @default.
• W1997522012 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22572697" @default.
• W1997522012 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1997522012 type Work @default.
• W1997522012 sameAs 1997522012 @default.
• W1997522012 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W1997522012 countsByYear W19975220122014 @default.
• W1997522012 countsByYear W19975220122015 @default.
• W1997522012 countsByYear W19975220122017 @default.
• W1997522012 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1997522012 hasAuthorship W1997522012A5072262486 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConcept C2776867784 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConcept C3018900477 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConcept C523026621 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConceptScore W1997522012C141071460 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConceptScore W1997522012C168563851 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConceptScore W1997522012C2776111594 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConceptScore W1997522012C2776867784 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConceptScore W1997522012C2780047204 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConceptScore W1997522012C2780120127 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConceptScore W1997522012C2908647359 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConceptScore W1997522012C3018900477 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConceptScore W1997522012C523026621 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConceptScore W1997522012C61434518 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConceptScore W1997522012C71924100 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConceptScore W1997522012C8443397 @default.
• W1997522012 hasConceptScore W1997522012C99454951 @default.
• W1997522012 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1997522012 hasLocation W19975220121 @default.
• W1997522012 hasLocation W19975220122 @default.
• W1997522012 hasOpenAccess W1997522012 @default.
• W1997522012 hasPrimaryLocation W19975220121 @default.
• W1997522012 hasRelatedWork W175892506 @default.
• W1997522012 hasRelatedWork W1997522012 @default.
• W1997522012 hasRelatedWork W2004604302 @default.
• W1997522012 hasRelatedWork W2086650638 @default.
• W1997522012 hasRelatedWork W2133631123 @default.
• W1997522012 hasRelatedWork W2317837859 @default.
• W1997522012 hasRelatedWork W2563485274 @default.
• W1997522012 hasRelatedWork W2595165435 @default.
• W1997522012 hasRelatedWork W2773050483 @default.
• W1997522012 hasRelatedWork W2809341368 @default.
• W1997522012 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W1997522012 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1997522012 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1997522012 magId "1997522012" @default.
• W1997522012 workType "article" @default.