FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1997679574> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1997679574 endingPage "1508" @default.
• W1997679574 startingPage "1496" @default.
• W1997679574 abstract "Isotope-assisted metabolic flux analysis (MFA) is a powerful methodology to quantify intracellular fluxes via isotope labeling experiments (ILEs). In batch cultures, which are often convenient, inexpensive or inevitable especially for eukaryotic systems, MFA is complicated by the presence of the initially present biomass. This unlabeled biomass may either mix with the newly synthesized labeled biomass or reflux into the metabolic network, thus masking the true labeling patterns in the newly synthesized biomass. Here, we report a detailed investigation of such metabolite reflux in cell suspensions of the tree poplar. In ILEs supplying 28% or 98% U-13C glucose as the sole organic carbon source, biomass components exhibited lower 13C enrichments than the supplied glucose as well as anomalous isotopomers not explainable by simple mixing of the initial and newly synthesized biomass. These anomalous labeling patterns were most prominent in a 98% U-13C glucose ILE. By comparing the performance of light- and dark-grown cells as well as by analyzing the isotope labeling patterns in aspartic and glutamic acids, we eliminated photosynthetic or anaplerotic fixation of extracellular 12CO2 as explanations for the anomalous labeling patterns. We further investigated four different metabolic models for interpreting the labeling patterns and evaluating fluxes: (i) a carbon source (glucose) dilution model, (ii) an isotopomer correction model with uniform dilution for all amino acids, (iii) an isotopomer correction model with variable dilution for different amino acids, and (iv) a comprehensive metabolite reflux model. Of these, the metabolite reflux model provided a substantially better fit for the observed labeling patterns (sum of squared residues: 538) than the other three models whose sum of squared residues were (i) 4626, (ii) 4983, and (iii) 1748, respectively. We compared fluxes determined using the metabolite reflux model to those determined using an independent methodology involving an excessively long ILE to wash out initial biomass and a minimal reflux model. This comparison showed identical or similar distributions for a majority of fluxes, thus validating our comprehensive reflux model. In summary, we have demonstrated the need for quantifying interactions between initially present biomass and newly synthesized biomass in batch ILEs, especially through the use of ≈100% U-13C carbon sources. Our ILEs reveal a high amount of metabolite reflux in poplar cell suspensions, which is well explained by a comprehensive metabolite reflux model." @default.
• W1997679574 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1997679574 creator A5014377149 @default.
• W1997679574 creator A5025571461 @default.
• W1997679574 creator A5043502866 @default.
• W1997679574 creator A5059288039 @default.
• W1997679574 creator A5086491608 @default.
• W1997679574 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W1997679574 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1997679574 title "Flux and reflux: metabolite reflux in plant suspension cells and its implications for isotope-assisted metabolic flux analysis" @default.
• W1997679574 cites W1968600644 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W1970621214 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W1972421432 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W1972990890 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W1989310500 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W1990712597 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W1992170087 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2001084806 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2001449103 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2018856264 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2023617120 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2030933109 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2031098051 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2035628607 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2038070550 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2039977436 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2040703574 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2046568771 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2049759143 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2051929959 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2055425726 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2075368931 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2075802407 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2079049473 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2081052511 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2083364998 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2095733998 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2123977690 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2136999310 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2140427431 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2140674401 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2144560876 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2166980679 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2170485159 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W2420758288 @default.
• W1997679574 cites W4237293127 @default.
• W1997679574 doi "https://doi.org/10.1039/c3mb70348g" @default.
• W1997679574 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24675729" @default.
• W1997679574 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1997679574 type Work @default.
• W1997679574 sameAs 1997679574 @default.
• W1997679574 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W1997679574 countsByYear W19976795742014 @default.
• W1997679574 countsByYear W19976795742015 @default.
• W1997679574 countsByYear W19976795742016 @default.
• W1997679574 countsByYear W19976795742017 @default.
• W1997679574 countsByYear W19976795742018 @default.
• W1997679574 countsByYear W19976795742020 @default.
• W1997679574 countsByYear W19976795742021 @default.
• W1997679574 countsByYear W19976795742022 @default.
• W1997679574 countsByYear W19976795742023 @default.
• W1997679574 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1997679574 hasAuthorship W1997679574A5014377149 @default.
• W1997679574 hasAuthorship W1997679574A5025571461 @default.
• W1997679574 hasAuthorship W1997679574A5043502866 @default.
• W1997679574 hasAuthorship W1997679574A5059288039 @default.
• W1997679574 hasAuthorship W1997679574A5086491608 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C107872376 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C115540264 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C127124265 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C135870905 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C158787203 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C160941953 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C185059815 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C2777477808 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C32909587 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C515207424 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C62231903 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C68709404 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConceptScore W1997679574C107872376 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConceptScore W1997679574C115540264 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConceptScore W1997679574C127124265 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConceptScore W1997679574C135870905 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConceptScore W1997679574C158787203 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConceptScore W1997679574C160941953 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConceptScore W1997679574C178790620 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConceptScore W1997679574C185059815 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConceptScore W1997679574C185592680 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConceptScore W1997679574C18903297 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConceptScore W1997679574C2777477808 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConceptScore W1997679574C32909587 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConceptScore W1997679574C515207424 @default.
• W1997679574 hasConceptScore W1997679574C55493867 @default.

• next