Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W199781103> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W199781103 endingPage "195" @default.
- W199781103 startingPage "191" @default.
- W199781103 abstract "Background: A number of evaluation tools for assessing the cognitive and affective domains in accordance with Bloom’s taxonomy are available for summative assessment. At the University of Health Sciences, Lahore, Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) and Structured Answer Questions (SAQs) are used for the evaluation of the cognitive domain at all six hierarch levels of taxonomy using the tables of specifications to ensure content validity. The rationale of having two evaluation tools seemingly similar in their evaluative competency yet differing in feasibility of construction, administration and marking is being challenged in this study. Methods: The MCQ and SAQ awards of the ten percent sample population amounting to 985 students in fifteen Medical and Dental Colleges across Punjab were entered into SPSS-15 and correlated according to the cognitive and affective level of assessment in relation to the Bloom’s taxonomy and their grouping in the Tables of Specifications, using parametric tests. 3494 anonymously administered questionnaires were analyzed using ethnograph. Results: No statistically significant difference was found in the mean marks obtained by the students when MCQs and SAQs were compared according to their groupings in the Tables of Specifications at all levels of cognitive hierarchical testing. End-of-year cognitive level testing targets set were not met and more questions were set at the lower cognitive testing levels. Expenses incurred in setting MCQs and SAQs were comparable but conduct and assessment costs for MCQs and SAQs were 6% and 94% of the total respectively. In both MCQs and SAQs students performed better at higher cognitive testing levels whereas the SAQs and MCQs were able to marginally test the lower levels of affective domain only. Student’s feedback showed that attempting MCQs required critical thinking, experience and practice. Conclusion: MCQs are more cost effective means at levels of cognitive domain assessment. Keywords: Cognitive Domain, Affective Domain, Bloom’s Taxonomy, Tables of Specifications, Evaluation" @default.
- W199781103 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W199781103 creator A5004530899 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5006479316 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5008815829 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5016672147 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5022195573 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5030118097 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5038532661 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5038879284 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5050752767 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5057772925 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5069818520 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5074086078 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5074963675 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5076187584 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5085908946 @default.
- W199781103 creator A5089077388 @default.
- W199781103 date "2010-06-01" @default.
- W199781103 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
- W199781103 title "Relationship of awards in multiple choice questions and structured answer questions in the undergraduate years and their effectiveness in evaluation." @default.
- W199781103 cites W1519851042 @default.
- W199781103 cites W1542932561 @default.
- W199781103 cites W1580749063 @default.
- W199781103 cites W1583027251 @default.
- W199781103 cites W1632602106 @default.
- W199781103 cites W1945633707 @default.
- W199781103 cites W1968569693 @default.
- W199781103 cites W19804843 @default.
- W199781103 cites W1999967263 @default.
- W199781103 cites W2019594528 @default.
- W199781103 cites W2047087529 @default.
- W199781103 cites W2068940617 @default.
- W199781103 cites W2098454906 @default.
- W199781103 cites W2110088104 @default.
- W199781103 cites W2130684795 @default.
- W199781103 cites W2139001711 @default.
- W199781103 cites W2141945954 @default.
- W199781103 cites W2146703507 @default.
- W199781103 cites W2165281830 @default.
- W199781103 cites W2168327886 @default.
- W199781103 cites W2170435532 @default.
- W199781103 cites W2381773038 @default.
- W199781103 cites W2573894086 @default.
- W199781103 cites W3146115948 @default.
- W199781103 cites W3217611625 @default.
- W199781103 cites W64275879 @default.
- W199781103 cites W67149822 @default.
- W199781103 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21702301" @default.
- W199781103 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W199781103 type Work @default.
- W199781103 sameAs 199781103 @default.
- W199781103 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W199781103 countsByYear W1997811032013 @default.
- W199781103 countsByYear W1997811032014 @default.
- W199781103 countsByYear W1997811032017 @default.
- W199781103 countsByYear W1997811032018 @default.
- W199781103 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5004530899 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5006479316 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5008815829 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5016672147 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5022195573 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5030118097 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5038532661 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5038879284 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5050752767 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5057772925 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5069818520 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5074086078 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5074963675 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5076187584 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5085908946 @default.
- W199781103 hasAuthorship W199781103A5089077388 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C152747807 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C176730311 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C42525527 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C59157022 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C6057870 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W199781103 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
- W199781103 hasConceptScore W199781103C118552586 @default.
- W199781103 hasConceptScore W199781103C126322002 @default.
- W199781103 hasConceptScore W199781103C145420912 @default.
- W199781103 hasConceptScore W199781103C152747807 @default.
- W199781103 hasConceptScore W199781103C15744967 @default.
- W199781103 hasConceptScore W199781103C169900460 @default.