FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1997925542> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1997925542 endingPage "872" @default.
• W1997925542 startingPage "865" @default.
• W1997925542 abstract "Graham JE, Ostir GV, Kuo Y-F, Fisher SR, Ottenbacher KJ. Relationship between test methodology and mean velocity in timed walk tests: a review. Objective To assess the degree to which test methodology affects outcomes in clinical evaluations of walking speed. Data Sources Medline database and reference lists from relevant articles. Study Selection We conducted electronic searches by using various combinations of terms related to clinical evaluations of walking speed. Resultant abstracts were then reviewed, and the methods and results section of promising full-text articles were searched for detailed descriptions of walk-test methodologies and results. Ultimately, articles were limited to the most common participant groups, older adults (aged) and individuals with neurologic conditions (neuro). The final sample included 46 studies. Data Extraction Three aspects of test methodology (pace, starting protocol, distance timed) were extracted for use as independent variables. Group mean age was extracted for use as a covariate. Group mean velocity was extracted for use as the dependent variable. Data were extracted by a single investigator. Data Synthesis Usual and/or comfortable pace was reported nearly twice as often as fast pace in both groups. Static-start protocols were more frequently used in aged studies, whereas dynamic (ie, rolling) starts were more common in neuro studies. Distances of 6 and 10m were most common in aged and neuro studies, respectively. Multivariate analyses (analysis of covariance) showed that only pace was significantly related to the mean velocity in both groups (aged: pace, P<.01; starting protocol, P=.21; distance, P=.05; neuro: pace, P=.01; starting protocol, P=.63; distance, P=.49). However, methodology-related differences in the distribution (95% confidence intervals) of performance scores across certain clinical standards were noted within all 3 methodology variables. Conclusions Clinical assessments of walking velocity are not conducted uniformly. Common methodologic factors may influence the clinical interpretation of walk performances. Universal walk-test methodology is warranted to improve intergroup comparisons and the development of useful clinical criteria and consensus norms." @default.
• W1997925542 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1997925542 creator A5014438243 @default.
• W1997925542 creator A5046827767 @default.
• W1997925542 creator A5048908759 @default.
• W1997925542 creator A5059592671 @default.
• W1997925542 creator A5070355717 @default.
• W1997925542 date "2008-05-01" @default.
• W1997925542 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W1997925542 title "Relationship Between Test Methodology and Mean Velocity in Timed Walk Tests: A Review" @default.
• W1997925542 cites W1167706802 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W1541923384 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W1557499137 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W1570598499 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W1589412230 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W1893914187 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W1967403472 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W1969007517 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W1969924382 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W1971815961 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W1978233266 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W1985119339 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W1993028683 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W1998782298 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2003838465 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2005489401 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2008849873 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2015608522 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2015997295 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2030148506 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2033552999 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2037161652 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2041828785 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2046196240 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2048787179 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2051118774 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2053204158 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2055521185 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2060295541 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2062377997 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2071298586 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2073757540 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2083408525 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2084023396 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2087032312 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2091124329 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2093293125 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2099878005 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2107750607 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2108033459 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2108923928 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2109425479 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2111465585 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2111687617 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2119116126 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2120014829 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2124341651 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2129629952 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2130794596 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2137438136 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2137734803 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2138253807 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2142971300 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2146534384 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2151490542 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2157315596 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2157831456 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2159530261 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2159686655 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2166388608 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2168727395 @default.
• W1997925542 cites W2289166964 @default.
• W1997925542 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.029" @default.
• W1997925542 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2659762" @default.
• W1997925542 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18452733" @default.
• W1997925542 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W1997925542 type Work @default.
• W1997925542 sameAs 1997925542 @default.
• W1997925542 citedByCount "141" @default.
• W1997925542 countsByYear W19979255422012 @default.
• W1997925542 countsByYear W19979255422013 @default.
• W1997925542 countsByYear W19979255422014 @default.
• W1997925542 countsByYear W19979255422015 @default.
• W1997925542 countsByYear W19979255422016 @default.
• W1997925542 countsByYear W19979255422017 @default.
• W1997925542 countsByYear W19979255422018 @default.
• W1997925542 countsByYear W19979255422019 @default.
• W1997925542 countsByYear W19979255422020 @default.
• W1997925542 countsByYear W19979255422021 @default.
• W1997925542 countsByYear W19979255422022 @default.
• W1997925542 countsByYear W19979255422023 @default.
• W1997925542 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1997925542 hasAuthorship W1997925542A5014438243 @default.
• W1997925542 hasAuthorship W1997925542A5046827767 @default.
• W1997925542 hasAuthorship W1997925542A5048908759 @default.
• W1997925542 hasAuthorship W1997925542A5059592671 @default.
• W1997925542 hasAuthorship W1997925542A5070355717 @default.
• W1997925542 hasBestOaLocation W19979255422 @default.

• next