FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1998253578> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1998253578 endingPage "146" @default.
• W1998253578 startingPage "139" @default.
• W1998253578 abstract "The optimal surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation is controversial.To compare prospectively the clinical outcomes of surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation by three different methods; discectomy alone, discectomy with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and diecectomy with posterolateral fusion (PLF), regardless of the postoperative radiological findings.This is a prospective, randomized, comparative study.This is a prospective, randomized, comparative study on 45 patients with first time recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Patients were evaluated clinically by using the criteria of the Japanese Orthopedic Association's evaluation system for low back pain syndrome (JOA score). The patients were classified into three groups: Group A; patients who had revision discectomy alone, group B; patients who had revision discectomy with TLIF, and group C; patients who had revision discectomy with PLF. The mean follow-up period was 37 (±7.85 STD) months.The mean overall recovery rate was 87.2% (±19.26 STD) and the satisfactory rate was 88.9%. Comparison between the three groups showed no significant difference with regard to the mean total postoperative JOA score, recovery rate, and satisfactory rate. However, the postoperative low back pain was significantly higher in group A than that of group B and C. Two patients in group A required further revision surgery. The incidences of dural tear and postoperative neurological deficit were higher in group A. The intraoperative blood loss and length of operation were significantly less in group A. The total cost of the procedure was significantly different between the three groups, being least in group A and highest in group B. There was no significant difference between the three groups with regard to the length of postoperative hospital stay.Revision discectomy is effective in patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Fusion with revision discectomy improves the postoperative low back pain, decreases the intraoperative risk of dural tear or neural damage and decreases the postoperative incidence of mechanical instability or re-recurrence. TLIF and PLF have comparable results when used with revision discectomy, but PLF has significantly less total cost than TLIF." @default.
• W1998253578 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1998253578 creator A5053776458 @default.
• W1998253578 creator A5075277408 @default.
• W1998253578 creator A5078140040 @default.
• W1998253578 date "2013-09-01" @default.
• W1998253578 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W1998253578 title "Recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A prospective comparative study of three surgical management procedures" @default.
• W1998253578 cites W1581420689 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W1975206178 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W1986123001 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W1987699926 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W1996393053 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W1997350554 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W1999953058 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2003835724 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2008667147 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2009526202 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2015762089 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2027069257 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2034543612 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2035633925 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2037321670 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2042892758 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2059986466 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2064719606 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2068173238 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2076401996 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2079946673 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2081526473 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2087616551 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2089255736 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2093193301 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2094429476 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2107461806 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2143949977 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2186897772 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2403817914 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2416500061 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2443965051 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2883205238 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2987461489 @default.
• W1998253578 cites W2026738206 @default.
• W1998253578 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.121685" @default.
• W1998253578 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3877500" @default.
• W1998253578 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24403956" @default.
• W1998253578 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1998253578 type Work @default.
• W1998253578 sameAs 1998253578 @default.
• W1998253578 citedByCount "57" @default.
• W1998253578 countsByYear W19982535782014 @default.
• W1998253578 countsByYear W19982535782015 @default.
• W1998253578 countsByYear W19982535782016 @default.
• W1998253578 countsByYear W19982535782017 @default.
• W1998253578 countsByYear W19982535782018 @default.
• W1998253578 countsByYear W19982535782019 @default.
• W1998253578 countsByYear W19982535782020 @default.
• W1998253578 countsByYear W19982535782021 @default.
• W1998253578 countsByYear W19982535782022 @default.
• W1998253578 countsByYear W19982535782023 @default.
• W1998253578 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1998253578 hasAuthorship W1998253578A5053776458 @default.
• W1998253578 hasAuthorship W1998253578A5075277408 @default.
• W1998253578 hasAuthorship W1998253578A5078140040 @default.
• W1998253578 hasBestOaLocation W19982535781 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConcept C2776008035 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConcept C2776501849 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConcept C2992636618 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConceptScore W1998253578C141071460 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConceptScore W1998253578C142724271 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConceptScore W1998253578C188816634 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConceptScore W1998253578C204787440 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConceptScore W1998253578C2776008035 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConceptScore W1998253578C2776501849 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConceptScore W1998253578C2780907711 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConceptScore W1998253578C2992636618 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConceptScore W1998253578C42219234 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConceptScore W1998253578C44575665 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConceptScore W1998253578C68312169 @default.
• W1998253578 hasConceptScore W1998253578C71924100 @default.
• W1998253578 hasIssue "03" @default.
• W1998253578 hasLocation W19982535781 @default.
• W1998253578 hasLocation W19982535782 @default.
• W1998253578 hasLocation W19982535783 @default.
• W1998253578 hasLocation W19982535784 @default.
• W1998253578 hasOpenAccess W1998253578 @default.
• W1998253578 hasPrimaryLocation W19982535781 @default.
• W1998253578 hasRelatedWork W1738114639 @default.
• W1998253578 hasRelatedWork W1974485288 @default.

• next