FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1998638522> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1998638522 endingPage "622" @default.
• W1998638522 startingPage "618" @default.
• W1998638522 abstract "National guidelines put forth by the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Gastroenterology provide recommendations regarding colorectal cancer screening and follow-up surveillance. Practice patterns may differ from these guidelines. This study analyzes the concordance between a tertiary equal access system and national guidelines for colorectal cancer and polyp surveillance.We performed a retrospective database review of all patients at a single institution undergoing screening colonoscopy from 2010 to 2011. Patient demographics, indication for colonoscopy, pathologic findings, and follow-up recommendations documented by the provider were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was performed in an attempt to identify predictors of discordant recommendations.One thousand four hundred twenty patients were identified (mean age, 54.3 ± 7.7 years, 48.6% women). The gastroenterology service performed the majority of colonoscopies (87.2%) compared with the surgery service (11.6%). The major indications were routine screening (84.4%) and a strong family history of colorectal cancer (12.2%). The adenoma detection rate for the entire cohort was 27.4%. Other pathologic conditions identified included hyperplastic polyps (16%), lymphoid aggregates (3.5%), and invasive adenocarcinoma (0.1%). Overall, follow-up recommendations correlated with established guidelines in 97% of cases. By multivariate analysis, only the final pathologic finding of lymphoid aggregates was associated with discordant recommendations (odds ratio [OR], 4.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64 to 12.99; P = .004). When comparing discordant recommendations between specialties, there was a statistically significant difference between gastroenterology (1.6%) and surgery (7.6%) (P < .0001) providers; surgeons trended toward recommending earlier follow-up examinations (P = .37).Overall, surveillance recommendations correlated well with current national guidelines. Concordance rates were higher with gastroenterologists in this cohort. Alterations based on final pathologic examination and individual cases remain clinically important." @default.
• W1998638522 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1998638522 creator A5005734787 @default.
• W1998638522 creator A5015740699 @default.
• W1998638522 creator A5031616267 @default.
• W1998638522 creator A5058994346 @default.
• W1998638522 creator A5063069471 @default.
• W1998638522 creator A5080661758 @default.
• W1998638522 creator A5084844886 @default.
• W1998638522 creator A5090437483 @default.
• W1998638522 date "2013-05-01" @default.
• W1998638522 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1998638522 title "An evaluation of colonoscopy surveillance guidelines: are we actually adhering to the guidelines?" @default.
• W1998638522 cites W1511481696 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W1983777402 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W1986685330 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W1994024803 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W2022892601 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W2043485485 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W2092631800 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W2095422750 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W2100977194 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W2102858186 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W2154316902 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W2163214467 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W2163315896 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W2306983460 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W2321845872 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W2915512755 @default.
• W1998638522 cites W4211141601 @default.
• W1998638522 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.12.006" @default.
• W1998638522 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23592173" @default.
• W1998638522 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1998638522 type Work @default.
• W1998638522 sameAs 1998638522 @default.
• W1998638522 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W1998638522 countsByYear W19986385222013 @default.
• W1998638522 countsByYear W19986385222014 @default.
• W1998638522 countsByYear W19986385222015 @default.
• W1998638522 countsByYear W19986385222018 @default.
• W1998638522 countsByYear W19986385222019 @default.
• W1998638522 countsByYear W19986385222020 @default.
• W1998638522 countsByYear W19986385222021 @default.
• W1998638522 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1998638522 hasAuthorship W1998638522A5005734787 @default.
• W1998638522 hasAuthorship W1998638522A5015740699 @default.
• W1998638522 hasAuthorship W1998638522A5031616267 @default.
• W1998638522 hasAuthorship W1998638522A5058994346 @default.
• W1998638522 hasAuthorship W1998638522A5063069471 @default.
• W1998638522 hasAuthorship W1998638522A5080661758 @default.
• W1998638522 hasAuthorship W1998638522A5084844886 @default.
• W1998638522 hasAuthorship W1998638522A5090437483 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C2777428134 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C2780642338 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C38180746 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C121608353 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C126322002 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C156957248 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C160798450 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C167135981 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C2777428134 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C2778435480 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C2780642338 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C38180746 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C44249647 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C512399662 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C526805850 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C61434518 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C71924100 @default.
• W1998638522 hasConceptScore W1998638522C72563966 @default.
• W1998638522 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W1998638522 hasLocation W19986385221 @default.
• W1998638522 hasLocation W19986385222 @default.
• W1998638522 hasOpenAccess W1998638522 @default.
• W1998638522 hasPrimaryLocation W19986385221 @default.
• W1998638522 hasRelatedWork W2022808982 @default.
• W1998638522 hasRelatedWork W2065895388 @default.
• W1998638522 hasRelatedWork W2091568553 @default.
• W1998638522 hasRelatedWork W2147083887 @default.
• W1998638522 hasRelatedWork W2417774362 @default.
• W1998638522 hasRelatedWork W2551851192 @default.
• W1998638522 hasRelatedWork W2601887321 @default.
• W1998638522 hasRelatedWork W2944981773 @default.
• W1998638522 hasRelatedWork W3017229079 @default.
• W1998638522 hasRelatedWork W3114384252 @default.
• W1998638522 hasVolume "205" @default.

• next