FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1998836701> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1998836701 endingPage "24" @default.
• W1998836701 startingPage "16" @default.
• W1998836701 abstract "Traditional surgical approaches to the anterior skull base often involve craniotomy, facial incisions, disruption of skeletal framework, tracheotomy, and an extended hospital stay. As experience with endoscopic sinus surgery has grown, the techniques and equipment have been found to be adaptable to treatment of lesions of the anterior and central skull base. A minimally invasive endoscopic approach theoretically offers the advantages of avoiding facial incisions, osteotomies, and tracheotomy; surgery should be less painful, recovery quicker, and hospital stays should be shorter. The study attempted to assess endoscopic approaches to the anterior and central skull base for its ability to achieve those goals.Retrospective review of 72 cases performed at a single institution from November 1996 to July 2003. A subgroup of 15 patients who underwent endoscopic approach to their pituitary tumors was compared with a similar group of 15 patients who underwent traditional open trans-sphenoidal surgery for their pituitary tumors.Patient records were analyzed and information tabulated for age, sex, disease, location of lesion, operative time, use of image-guided surgical systems, blood loss, length of intensive care unit stay, duration of operative pain, length of postoperative hospitalization, complications, and completeness of resection.Of the cases, 86.1% were performed exclusively endoscopically, and 13.9% used a combination of endoscopic and open techniques. An image-guided surgical system was used in 83% of cases. Hospital length of stay was 2.3 days for the exclusively endoscopic group as opposed to 8 days for the combined group. With the patients with pituitary tumors, operative times were similar between the two groups (255.13 vs. 245.73 min), blood loss was less in the endoscopic group (125.33 vs. 243.33 mL), pain duration was shorter in the endoscopic group (10 of 15 patients pain free on postoperative day 1 vs. 2 of 15 patients pain free in the open group), and intensive care unit stay and hospital length of stay were both shorter in the endoscopic group. Complication rates and completeness of resection was similar in both groups, although the open group had a higher rate of complications related to the approach to the sella.The study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of judicious endoscopic approaches to anterior skull base lesions. An outcomes assessment in pituitary surgery demonstrates advantages of an endoscopic approach in appropriate cases." @default.
• W1998836701 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1998836701 creator A5039909867 @default.
• W1998836701 creator A5057431534 @default.
• W1998836701 creator A5091605019 @default.
• W1998836701 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W1998836701 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W1998836701 title "Endoscopic Surgery of the Anterior Skull Base" @default.
• W1998836701 cites W1995543623 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2004063016 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2005986154 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2008124438 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2011641518 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2012761944 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2016761296 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2017521332 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2020764782 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2028215752 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2029375131 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2035054472 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2046007520 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2046528553 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2051363798 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2053144477 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2061012074 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2064421689 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2066187114 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2077469685 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2079853144 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2085599489 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2085680056 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2090858058 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2094342083 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2104388779 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2104786047 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2105406577 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2106616439 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2111453457 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2138941726 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2397295848 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W2414295633 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W253941688 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W4233086201 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W4240444200 @default.
• W1998836701 cites W66362155 @default.
• W1998836701 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000150681.68355.85" @default.
• W1998836701 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15630358" @default.
• W1998836701 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W1998836701 type Work @default.
• W1998836701 sameAs 1998836701 @default.
• W1998836701 citedByCount "121" @default.
• W1998836701 countsByYear W19988367012012 @default.
• W1998836701 countsByYear W19988367012013 @default.
• W1998836701 countsByYear W19988367012014 @default.
• W1998836701 countsByYear W19988367012015 @default.
• W1998836701 countsByYear W19988367012016 @default.
• W1998836701 countsByYear W19988367012017 @default.
• W1998836701 countsByYear W19988367012018 @default.
• W1998836701 countsByYear W19988367012019 @default.
• W1998836701 countsByYear W19988367012020 @default.
• W1998836701 countsByYear W19988367012021 @default.
• W1998836701 countsByYear W19988367012022 @default.
• W1998836701 countsByYear W19988367012023 @default.
• W1998836701 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1998836701 hasAuthorship W1998836701A5039909867 @default.
• W1998836701 hasAuthorship W1998836701A5057431534 @default.
• W1998836701 hasAuthorship W1998836701A5091605019 @default.
• W1998836701 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1998836701 hasConcept C2777047896 @default.
• W1998836701 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W1998836701 hasConcept C2778551211 @default.
• W1998836701 hasConcept C2778871575 @default.
• W1998836701 hasConcept C2779300802 @default.
• W1998836701 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1998836701 hasConceptScore W1998836701C141071460 @default.
• W1998836701 hasConceptScore W1998836701C2777047896 @default.
• W1998836701 hasConceptScore W1998836701C2778451229 @default.
• W1998836701 hasConceptScore W1998836701C2778551211 @default.
• W1998836701 hasConceptScore W1998836701C2778871575 @default.
• W1998836701 hasConceptScore W1998836701C2779300802 @default.
• W1998836701 hasConceptScore W1998836701C71924100 @default.
• W1998836701 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1998836701 hasLocation W19988367011 @default.
• W1998836701 hasLocation W19988367012 @default.
• W1998836701 hasOpenAccess W1998836701 @default.
• W1998836701 hasPrimaryLocation W19988367011 @default.
• W1998836701 hasRelatedWork W2029543626 @default.
• W1998836701 hasRelatedWork W2083371950 @default.
• W1998836701 hasRelatedWork W2313377300 @default.
• W1998836701 hasRelatedWork W2321516769 @default.
• W1998836701 hasRelatedWork W2330470159 @default.
• W1998836701 hasRelatedWork W2361753314 @default.
• W1998836701 hasRelatedWork W2364732894 @default.
• W1998836701 hasRelatedWork W2378499887 @default.
• W1998836701 hasRelatedWork W3210994687 @default.
• W1998836701 hasRelatedWork W4286911675 @default.
• W1998836701 hasVolume "115" @default.
• W1998836701 isParatext "false" @default.

• next