FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1999177384> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1999177384 endingPage "968" @default.
• W1999177384 startingPage "967" @default.
• W1999177384 abstract "Reviewed by: The Embattled Self: French Soldiers’ Testimony of the Great War Eugenia C. Kiesling The Embattled Self: French Soldiers’ Testimony of the Great War. By Leonard V. Smith. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2007. ISBN 978-0-8014-4523-1. Notes. Bibliography. Index. Pp. xi, 214. $39.95. Leonard Smith reassuringly concludes his excellent little study of French soldiers’ Great War writings by declining to propose a replacement “metanarrative” for a discarded one of tragedy and victimization (p. 202). He assures the reader that French war memoirs [End Page 967] and novels were not uniform products of machine-age war but individual voices describing a range of experiences and expressing conflicting moral attitudes. In other words, we can use war literature to learn what Great War soldiers did and how they thought about it—and we can do so without grappling with “metanarrative.” Smith’s study focuses on four themes in French war literature: rites of passage (mobilization, combat, and reintegration into civil society); “mastery” of war’s defining experiences (death, mutilation, killing); soldiers’ “consent” as an explanation for their continued participation in the four years of slaughter; and novels as the preferred medium for bringing closure to wartime trauma. Smith’s chapter on rites of passage begins with predictable themes. Mobilization brings both separation from civilian society and certification of manhood. The initiation to war is frightening, painful, and sometimes even mutilating, but it makes boys into men and men into warriors. Survival, moreover, is its own triumph. While the themes are predictable, such is the enormity of the Great War that actual rites of passage do not fall into conventional patterns. Each of the examples Smith describes seems particular to an individual rather than representative of any universal experience. Indeed, twice he notes that wartime rites of passage shifted the focus from group to individual (pp. 35–36), that “liminality brought individuality back to center stage” (p. 42). Thus, these are not true rites of passages which, as Smith notes “were collective…and their meanings were understood in advance by both the initiates and the broader society” (p. 60). Just as the rites of passage were ambiguous, the fighting itself was too awful and overwhelming to allow the development of a uniform narrative. Indeed, Smith argues, “in creating themselves through stories of death, mutilation, and killing, narrators and narratives produced not mastery but a fascinating textual world of contradictions, ambiguities, and peculiarities” (p. 62). The result of these “endlessly inventive attempts” is a fascinating puzzle for the historian (p. 62). Particularly interesting is Smith’s observation that Great War memoirs are remarkably silent on the matter of killing (p. 90). The fact of such reticence is clearly important in its own right, but it does not encourage those of us hoping to find in the war literature a better understanding of how the soldiers fought. Smith’s study of “consent” continues his long-term project of replacing the soldier as victim with the soldier as a conscious member of the political community of the Third Republic. The poilu’s commitment to the cause reflected “a powerful combination of republican logic and nationalist affect” (p. 125). One cannot help but be moved by Smith’s description of the pride evinced by the survivors of one unit at a decoration ceremony at Verdun in June 1916. The last chapter suggests how the novels of the interwar period closed out the war in such a way as to silence the many conflicting voices of the wartime literature. Sadly for our understanding, the war had been reduced to a tragedy suffered by its participants mostly in silence. This is not an easy book, but no one should be put off by Smith’s language of témoignage and “temporality.” Lucid prose renders complex arguments accessible and the text a genuine pleasure to read. That one finishes it with questions merely acknowledges the inherent intractability of the Great War. Thanks to Smith’s Embattled Self we may, however, tackle that conflict with a greater confidence in our sources. [End Page 968] Eugenia C. Kiesling United States Military Academy West Point, New York Copyright © 2008 The Society for Military History" @default.
• W1999177384 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1999177384 creator A5062052467 @default.
• W1999177384 date "2008-01-01" @default.
• W1999177384 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1999177384 title "<i>The Embattled Self: French Soldiers’ Testimony of the Great War</i> (review)" @default.
• W1999177384 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/jmh.0.0027" @default.
• W1999177384 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W1999177384 type Work @default.
• W1999177384 sameAs 1999177384 @default.
• W1999177384 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1999177384 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1999177384 hasAuthorship W1999177384A5062052467 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConcept C167388122 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConcept C177897776 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConcept C2779337326 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConcept C2780027720 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConcept C81631423 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConceptScore W1999177384C124952713 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConceptScore W1999177384C142362112 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConceptScore W1999177384C167388122 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConceptScore W1999177384C17744445 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConceptScore W1999177384C177897776 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConceptScore W1999177384C199033989 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConceptScore W1999177384C199539241 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConceptScore W1999177384C2779337326 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConceptScore W1999177384C2780027720 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConceptScore W1999177384C52119013 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConceptScore W1999177384C74916050 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConceptScore W1999177384C81631423 @default.
• W1999177384 hasConceptScore W1999177384C95457728 @default.
• W1999177384 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1999177384 hasLocation W19991773841 @default.
• W1999177384 hasOpenAccess W1999177384 @default.
• W1999177384 hasPrimaryLocation W19991773841 @default.
• W1999177384 hasRelatedWork W1999177384 @default.
• W1999177384 hasRelatedWork W2112533837 @default.
• W1999177384 hasRelatedWork W2247595959 @default.
• W1999177384 hasRelatedWork W2807958411 @default.
• W1999177384 hasRelatedWork W3092493007 @default.
• W1999177384 hasRelatedWork W3119900865 @default.
• W1999177384 hasRelatedWork W3205040790 @default.
• W1999177384 hasRelatedWork W4312965682 @default.
• W1999177384 hasRelatedWork W4320159660 @default.
• W1999177384 hasRelatedWork W95931615 @default.
• W1999177384 hasVolume "72" @default.
• W1999177384 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1999177384 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1999177384 magId "1999177384" @default.
• W1999177384 workType "article" @default.