FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1999299256> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1999299256 endingPage "986" @default.
• W1999299256 startingPage "975" @default.
• W1999299256 abstract "This paper proposes a new methodology for assessing the efficiency of medical diagnostic systems and clinical decision support systems by using the feedback/opinions of medical experts. The methodology behind this work is based on a comparison between the expert feedback that has helped solve different clinical cases and the expert system that has evaluated these same cases. Once the results are returned, an arbitration process is carried out in order to ensure the correctness of the results provided by both methods. Once this process has been completed, the results are analyzed using Precision, Recall, Accuracy, Specificity and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) (PRAS-M) metrics. When the methodology is applied, the results obtained from a real diagnostic system allow researchers to establish the accuracy of the system based on objective facts. The methodology returns enough information to analyze the system's behavior for each disease in the knowledge base or across the entire knowledge base. It also returns data on the efficiency of the different assessors involved in the evaluation process, analyzing their behavior in the diagnostic process. The proposed work facilitates the evaluation of medical diagnostic systems, having a reliable process based on objective facts. The methodology presented in this research makes it possible to identify the main characteristics that define a medical diagnostic system and their values, allowing for system improvement. A good example of the results provided by the application of the methodology is shown in this paper. A diagnosis system was evaluated by means of this methodology, yielding positive results (statistically significant) when comparing the system with the assessors that participated in the evaluation process of the system through metrics such as recall (+27.54%) and MCC (+32.19%). These results demonstrate the real applicability of the methodology used." @default.
• W1999299256 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1999299256 creator A5018921625 @default.
• W1999299256 creator A5024429907 @default.
• W1999299256 creator A5069508933 @default.
• W1999299256 creator A5076253566 @default.
• W1999299256 creator A5077299140 @default.
• W1999299256 date "2013-09-01" @default.
• W1999299256 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1999299256 title "Using experts feedback in clinical case resolution and arbitration as accuracy diagnosis methodology" @default.
• W1999299256 cites W1523600104 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W1539012892 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W1644997609 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W166169566 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W1966756689 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W1990027655 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W1990748933 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W1997370262 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2004880302 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2008827081 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2010871295 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2023753684 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2028972160 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2050521696 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2057212716 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2060990722 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2069340802 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2074706689 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2078759660 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2105490558 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2107432340 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2109553965 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2130355701 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2136375912 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2152369636 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2158274224 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2160014933 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2163550872 @default.
• W1999299256 cites W2189395491 @default.
• W1999299256 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.05.003" @default.
• W1999299256 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23816170" @default.
• W1999299256 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1999299256 type Work @default.
• W1999299256 sameAs 1999299256 @default.
• W1999299256 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W1999299256 countsByYear W19992992562015 @default.
• W1999299256 countsByYear W19992992562016 @default.
• W1999299256 countsByYear W19992992562017 @default.
• W1999299256 countsByYear W19992992562019 @default.
• W1999299256 countsByYear W19992992562022 @default.
• W1999299256 countsByYear W19992992562023 @default.
• W1999299256 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1999299256 hasAuthorship W1999299256A5018921625 @default.
• W1999299256 hasAuthorship W1999299256A5024429907 @default.
• W1999299256 hasAuthorship W1999299256A5069508933 @default.
• W1999299256 hasAuthorship W1999299256A5076253566 @default.
• W1999299256 hasAuthorship W1999299256A5077299140 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C124101348 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C160151201 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C4554734 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C534262118 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C55439883 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C58328972 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C81669768 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C111919701 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C11413529 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C119857082 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C124101348 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C142724271 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C154945302 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C160151201 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C17744445 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C199539241 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C41008148 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C4554734 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C534262118 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C55439883 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C58328972 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C71924100 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C81669768 @default.
• W1999299256 hasConceptScore W1999299256C98045186 @default.
• W1999299256 hasFunder F4320321837 @default.
• W1999299256 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W1999299256 hasLocation W19992992561 @default.
• W1999299256 hasLocation W19992992562 @default.
• W1999299256 hasOpenAccess W1999299256 @default.
• W1999299256 hasPrimaryLocation W19992992561 @default.
• W1999299256 hasRelatedWork W104839790 @default.

• next