FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1999571039> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1999571039 endingPage "1157" @default.
• W1999571039 startingPage "1151" @default.
• W1999571039 abstract "Prescribing errors are common. It has been suggested that the severity as well as the frequency of errors should be assessed when measuring prescribing error rates. This would provide more clinically relevant information, and allow more complete evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce errors.The objective of this systematic review was to describe the tools used to assess prescribing error severity in studies reporting hospital prescribing error rates.The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and CINAHL (January 1985-January 2013).We included studies that reported the detection and rate of prescribing errors in prescriptions for adult and/or pediatric hospital inpatients, or elaborated on the properties of severity assessment tools used by these studies. Studies not published in English, or that evaluated errors for only one disease or drug class, one route of administration, or one type of prescribing error, were excluded, as were letters and conference abstracts. One reviewer screened all abstracts and obtained complete articles. A second reviewer assessed 10 % of all abstracts and complete articles to check reliability of the screening process.Tools were appraised for country and method of development, whether the tool assessed actual or potential harm, levels of severity assessed, and results of any validity and reliability studies.Fifty-seven percent of 107 studies measuring prescribing error rates included an assessment of severity. Forty tools were identified that assessed severity, only two of which had acceptable reliability and validity. In general, little information was given on the method of development or ease of use of the tools, although one tool required four reviewers and was thus potentially time consuming.The review was limited to studies written in English. One of the review authors was also the author of one of the tools, giving a potential source of bias.A wide range of severity assessment tools are used in the literature. Developing a basis of comparison between tools would potentially be helpful in comparing findings across studies. There is a potential need to establish a less time-consuming method of measuring severity of prescribing error, with acceptable international reliability and validity." @default.
• W1999571039 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1999571039 creator A5005197558 @default.
• W1999571039 creator A5028633516 @default.
• W1999571039 creator A5057632412 @default.
• W1999571039 creator A5086115906 @default.
• W1999571039 date "2013-08-18" @default.
• W1999571039 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1999571039 title "Measuring the Severity of Prescribing Errors: A Systematic Review" @default.
• W1999571039 cites W1500726896 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W1823647263 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W1940172924 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W1965037947 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W1972942750 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W1977988233 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W1978325682 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W1981235738 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W1988201237 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W1998721431 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2015741957 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2018313574 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2025393804 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2026944514 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2028807985 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2031080542 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2037780756 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2038780959 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2041601677 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2041686538 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2051162794 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2057265030 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2063100277 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2064296766 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2070089257 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2083054612 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2087209070 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2092626498 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2095965282 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2096809626 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2097419324 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2101098820 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2102093032 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2103153600 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2113838468 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2130281954 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2131225010 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2138868249 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2143192874 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2144945593 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2147084906 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2149130502 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2163146667 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2166077989 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2167704910 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2169673746 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W2418535187 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W4248685224 @default.
• W1999571039 cites W4292550096 @default.
• W1999571039 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-013-0092-0" @default.
• W1999571039 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3834169" @default.
• W1999571039 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23955385" @default.
• W1999571039 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1999571039 type Work @default.
• W1999571039 sameAs 1999571039 @default.
• W1999571039 citedByCount "49" @default.
• W1999571039 countsByYear W19995710392014 @default.
• W1999571039 countsByYear W19995710392015 @default.
• W1999571039 countsByYear W19995710392016 @default.
• W1999571039 countsByYear W19995710392017 @default.
• W1999571039 countsByYear W19995710392018 @default.
• W1999571039 countsByYear W19995710392019 @default.
• W1999571039 countsByYear W19995710392020 @default.
• W1999571039 countsByYear W19995710392021 @default.
• W1999571039 countsByYear W19995710392022 @default.
• W1999571039 countsByYear W19995710392023 @default.
• W1999571039 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1999571039 hasAuthorship W1999571039A5005197558 @default.
• W1999571039 hasAuthorship W1999571039A5028633516 @default.
• W1999571039 hasAuthorship W1999571039A5057632412 @default.
• W1999571039 hasAuthorship W1999571039A5086115906 @default.
• W1999571039 hasBestOaLocation W19995710391 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C2426938 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConcept C98274493 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConceptScore W1999571039C118552586 @default.
• W1999571039 hasConceptScore W1999571039C121332964 @default.

• next