Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000128527> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2000128527 endingPage "2974" @default.
- W2000128527 startingPage "2962" @default.
- W2000128527 abstract "The structure and physicochemical properties of pulse starches isolated from different cultivars of faba bean (FB), black bean (BB) and pinto bean (PB) were examined. FB starches exhibited numerous cracked granules, whereas the surface of PB and BB starches showed no evidence of cracks or indentations. Apparent amylose, phosphorus and bound lipid contents ranged from 25.8 to 33.6%, 0.004 to 0.009% and 0.13 to 0.15%, respectively. Variations in the above parameters among cultivars of FB and BB were marginal, but significant (P < 0.05) among cultivars of PB. All starches exhibited a ‘C’ type X-ray pattern. The amount of B-type unit cells ranged from 20.6 to 25.0% (FB), 15.4 to 17.7% (BB) and 7.9 to 17.3% (PB). Relative crystallinity ranged from 20.3 to 21.9% (FB), 20.4 to 21.3% (BB) and 21.3 to 23.1% (PB). Molecular order near the granule surface followed the order: BB ~ PB > FB. Variations in molecular order among cultivars of FB, BB and PB were marginal. Differences in amylopectin chain length distribution among FB, BB and PB starches and among cultivars were marginal. The extent of interaction of amylopectin double helical associations within the crystalline lamella followed the order: BB ~ PB > FB. Amylose leaching (AML) in the temperature range 60–90 °C, gelatinization temperatures and enthalpy of gelatinization followed the order: FB > BB ~ PB, FB > PB > BB, BB ~ PB > FB and BB ~ PB > FB, respectively. Variations in AML among cultivars were marginal in FB, but significant (P < 0.05) in BB and PB starches. Swelling factor (SF) in the temperature range 60 to 85 °C and at 90 °C followed the order: FB > BB ~ PB and BB ~ PB > FB, respectively. Differences in SF among cultivars of FB and BB starches were more significant (P < 0.05) at temperatures below 80 °C, whereas, in PB starches, differences among cultivars were more significant (P < 0.05) at temperatures above 80 °C. Variations in peak viscosity, viscosity breakdown and set-back were marginal among FB cultivars, but were significant (P < 0.05) among BB and PB (PB > BB) cultivars. FB starches were hydrolyzed by 2.2 N HCl at a faster rate than BB and PB starches (BB > PB). The amounts of rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS), resistant starch (RS), hydrolysis index (HI) and expected glycemic index (eGI) followed the order: FB > BB ~ PB, FB > BB ~ PB, BB ~ PB > FB, FB > BB > PB and FB > BB > PB, respectively. Variations in RDS, SDS, RS, HI and eGI among cultivars followed the order: PB > BB > FB. The in vitro digestibility studies showed that PB and BB starches may be more effective than FB starches in controlling blood glucose levels. ► Morphology and structural variations among starches influenced their properties. ► Cracked granules and disorganized helices were present only in faba bean. ► Properties of faba bean were different to those of the other starches. ► Food applications for these starches require prior modification." @default.
- W2000128527 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2000128527 creator A5005029732 @default.
- W2000128527 creator A5019849501 @default.
- W2000128527 creator A5037088614 @default.
- W2000128527 creator A5043387282 @default.
- W2000128527 creator A5043487407 @default.
- W2000128527 creator A5065934547 @default.
- W2000128527 creator A5068278501 @default.
- W2000128527 creator A5087912036 @default.
- W2000128527 date "2011-11-01" @default.
- W2000128527 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
- W2000128527 title "Structure of faba bean, black bean and pinto bean starches at different levels of granule organization and their physicochemical properties" @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1824388142 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1964983164 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1967979744 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1968209141 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1970396952 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1970980684 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1973445650 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1975550545 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1977663633 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1980751054 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1982429129 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1982940584 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1987753620 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1994521589 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1994967832 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1996695770 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1996704772 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1997350210 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W1997540145 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2003074697 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2003589934 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2012791923 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2013549975 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2017026642 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2017387323 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2031356228 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2033867044 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2033936333 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2038796626 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2045998402 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2048513996 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2053524878 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2054627519 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2059735033 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2061832952 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2066999731 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2071293073 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2073585463 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2075834925 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2077938270 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2081973293 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2086115196 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2087470002 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2090805548 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2107061790 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2128149995 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2128703364 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2132078016 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2145512600 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2148105030 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2148340064 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2168988017 @default.
- W2000128527 cites W2334917834 @default.
- W2000128527 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.07.006" @default.
- W2000128527 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W2000128527 type Work @default.
- W2000128527 sameAs 2000128527 @default.
- W2000128527 citedByCount "182" @default.
- W2000128527 countsByYear W20001285272012 @default.
- W2000128527 countsByYear W20001285272013 @default.
- W2000128527 countsByYear W20001285272014 @default.
- W2000128527 countsByYear W20001285272015 @default.
- W2000128527 countsByYear W20001285272016 @default.
- W2000128527 countsByYear W20001285272017 @default.
- W2000128527 countsByYear W20001285272018 @default.
- W2000128527 countsByYear W20001285272019 @default.
- W2000128527 countsByYear W20001285272020 @default.
- W2000128527 countsByYear W20001285272021 @default.
- W2000128527 countsByYear W20001285272022 @default.
- W2000128527 countsByYear W20001285272023 @default.
- W2000128527 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2000128527 hasAuthorship W2000128527A5005029732 @default.
- W2000128527 hasAuthorship W2000128527A5019849501 @default.
- W2000128527 hasAuthorship W2000128527A5037088614 @default.
- W2000128527 hasAuthorship W2000128527A5043387282 @default.
- W2000128527 hasAuthorship W2000128527A5043487407 @default.
- W2000128527 hasAuthorship W2000128527A5065934547 @default.
- W2000128527 hasAuthorship W2000128527A5068278501 @default.
- W2000128527 hasAuthorship W2000128527A5087912036 @default.
- W2000128527 hasConcept C144027150 @default.
- W2000128527 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W2000128527 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W2000128527 hasConcept C197321923 @default.
- W2000128527 hasConcept C2776106649 @default.
- W2000128527 hasConcept C2776286235 @default.