FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000223997> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000223997 endingPage "16" @default.
• W2000223997 startingPage "6" @default.
• W2000223997 abstract "Crisis resource management (CRM) skills are a set of nonmedical skills required to manage medical emergencies. There is currently no gold standard for evaluation of CRM performance. A prior study examined the use of a global rating scale (GRS) to evaluate CRM performance. This current study compared the use of a GRS and a checklist as formal rating instruments to evaluate CRM performance during simulated emergencies.First-year and third-year residents participated in two simulator scenarios each. Three raters then evaluated resident performance in CRM using edited video recordings using both a GRS and a checklist. The Ottawa GRS provides a seven-point anchored ordinal scale for performance in five categories of CRM, and an overall performance score. The Ottawa CRM checklist provides 12 items in the five categories of CRM, with a maximum cumulative score of 30 points. Construct validity was measured on the basis of content validity, response process, internal structure, and response to other variables. T-test analysis of Ottawa GRS scores was conducted to examine response to the variable of level of training. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) scores were used to measure inter-rater reliability for both scenarios.Thirty-two first-year and 28 third-year residents participated in the study. Third-year residents produced higher mean scores for overall CRM performance than first-year residents (P < 0.05), and in all individual categories within the Ottawa GRS (P < 0.05) and the Ottawa CRM checklist (P < 0.05). This difference was noted for both scenarios and for each individual rater (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference in resident scores was observed between scenarios for both instruments. ICC scores of 0.59 and 0.61 were obtained for Scenarios 1 and 2 with the Ottawa GRS, whereas ICC scores of 0.63 and 0.55 were obtained with the Ottawa CRM checklist. Users indicated a strong preference for the Ottawa GRS given ease of scoring, presence of an overall score, and the potential for formative evaluation.Construct validity seems to be present when using both the Ottawa GRS and CRM checklist to evaluate CRM performance during simulated emergencies. Data also indicate the presence of moderate inter-rater reliability when using both the Ottawa GRS and CRM checklist." @default.
• W2000223997 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000223997 creator A5010328263 @default.
• W2000223997 creator A5028075537 @default.
• W2000223997 creator A5048005267 @default.
• W2000223997 creator A5083035806 @default.
• W2000223997 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W2000223997 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W2000223997 title "A Comparison of Global Rating Scale and Checklist Scores in the Validation of an Evaluation Tool to Assess Performance in the Resuscitation of Critically Ill Patients During Simulated Emergencies (Abbreviated as “CRM Simulator Study IB”)" @default.
• W2000223997 cites W1971289020 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W1982827387 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W1986760405 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W1990539893 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2012014818 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2012762074 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2024380287 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2029461614 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2030993735 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2040596761 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2042150133 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2047526441 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2051756708 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2055108316 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2064228794 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2070067174 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2076560454 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2083139191 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2084580771 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2112783269 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2118989035 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2149397443 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2161254436 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2169745050 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2170119333 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W2170202608 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W250692 @default.
• W2000223997 cites W4323053692 @default.
• W2000223997 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0b013e3181880472" @default.
• W2000223997 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19212245" @default.
• W2000223997 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2000223997 type Work @default.
• W2000223997 sameAs 2000223997 @default.
• W2000223997 citedByCount "117" @default.
• W2000223997 countsByYear W20002239972012 @default.
• W2000223997 countsByYear W20002239972013 @default.
• W2000223997 countsByYear W20002239972014 @default.
• W2000223997 countsByYear W20002239972015 @default.
• W2000223997 countsByYear W20002239972016 @default.
• W2000223997 countsByYear W20002239972017 @default.
• W2000223997 countsByYear W20002239972018 @default.
• W2000223997 countsByYear W20002239972019 @default.
• W2000223997 countsByYear W20002239972020 @default.
• W2000223997 countsByYear W20002239972021 @default.
• W2000223997 countsByYear W20002239972022 @default.
• W2000223997 countsByYear W20002239972023 @default.
• W2000223997 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000223997 hasAuthorship W2000223997A5010328263 @default.
• W2000223997 hasAuthorship W2000223997A5028075537 @default.
• W2000223997 hasAuthorship W2000223997A5048005267 @default.
• W2000223997 hasAuthorship W2000223997A5083035806 @default.
• W2000223997 hasBestOaLocation W20002239971 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C49453240 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConcept C83849319 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C104709138 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C121332964 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C138496976 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C15744967 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C163258240 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C171606756 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C180747234 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C205649164 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C2778755073 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C2779356329 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C43214815 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C49453240 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C58640448 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C62520636 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C70410870 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C71924100 @default.
• W2000223997 hasConceptScore W2000223997C83849319 @default.
• W2000223997 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2000223997 hasLocation W20002239971 @default.
• W2000223997 hasLocation W20002239972 @default.

• next