Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000237183> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 90 of
90
with 100 items per page.
- W2000237183 endingPage "411" @default.
- W2000237183 startingPage "407" @default.
- W2000237183 abstract "The study purpose was to compare hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy completed via robotic assistance, laparotomy, and laparoscopy for endometrial cancer staging with respect to operative and peri-operative outcomes, complications, adequacy of staging, and cost.One hundred and ten patients underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer staging. All cases were performed by a single surgeon, at a single institution (40 robotic, 40 laparotomy, and 30 laparoscopic) and were retrospectively reviewed to compare demographics and peri-operative variables including, operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph node count, hospital stay, complications, and return to normal activity. Additionally, a cost comparison between all three modalities was performed.Patients undergoing robotic assisted hysterectomy and staging experienced longer operative time than the laparotomy cohort with no difference in comparison to the laparoscopic cohort (184 min, 108.6 min, 171 min, p<0.0001, p=0.14). Estimated blood loss was significantly reduced for the robotic cohort in comparison to the laparotomy cohort and comparable to laparoscopic cohort (166 cc, 316 cc, 253 cc, p=0.01, p=0.25). The complication rate was lowest in the robotic cohort (7.5%) relative to the laparotomy (27.5%) and laparoscopic cohorts (20%) (p=0.015, p=0.03). Average return to normal activity for the robotic patients was significantly shorter than those undergoing laparotomy (24.1 days versus 52 days, p<0.0001) and those undergoing laparoscopy (31.6 days, p=0.005). Lymph node retrieval did not differ between the 3 groups (robotic 17 nodes, laparotomy 14 nodes, laparoscopic 17 nodes). The total average cost for hysterectomy with staging completed via laparotomy was $12,943.60, for standard laparoscopy $7569.80, and for robotic assistance $8212.00. The difference in cost between laparotomy and robotic cohorts was significant p=0.0001 while there was no statistically significant difference in cost between laparoscopy and robotic cohorts p=0.06.Robotic hysterectomy provides comparable node retrieval to laparotomy and laparoscopic procedures in the case of the experienced laparoscopic surgeon. While robotic hysterectomy takes longer to perform than hysterectomy completed via laparotomy, it is equivalent to laparoscopic hysterectomy and provides the patient with a more expeditious return to normal activity with reduced post-operative morbidity. Additionally, the average cost for hysterectomy and staging was highest for laparotomy, followed by robotic, and least for standard laparoscopy." @default.
- W2000237183 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2000237183 creator A5013709891 @default.
- W2000237183 creator A5030811708 @default.
- W2000237183 creator A5036809584 @default.
- W2000237183 creator A5066638443 @default.
- W2000237183 creator A5080291972 @default.
- W2000237183 date "2008-12-01" @default.
- W2000237183 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W2000237183 title "Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques" @default.
- W2000237183 cites W1965216816 @default.
- W2000237183 cites W1984252798 @default.
- W2000237183 cites W1987676264 @default.
- W2000237183 cites W1989375656 @default.
- W2000237183 cites W2017292324 @default.
- W2000237183 cites W2059905613 @default.
- W2000237183 cites W2087080880 @default.
- W2000237183 cites W2123661073 @default.
- W2000237183 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022" @default.
- W2000237183 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18829091" @default.
- W2000237183 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W2000237183 type Work @default.
- W2000237183 sameAs 2000237183 @default.
- W2000237183 citedByCount "333" @default.
- W2000237183 countsByYear W20002371832012 @default.
- W2000237183 countsByYear W20002371832013 @default.
- W2000237183 countsByYear W20002371832014 @default.
- W2000237183 countsByYear W20002371832015 @default.
- W2000237183 countsByYear W20002371832016 @default.
- W2000237183 countsByYear W20002371832017 @default.
- W2000237183 countsByYear W20002371832018 @default.
- W2000237183 countsByYear W20002371832019 @default.
- W2000237183 countsByYear W20002371832020 @default.
- W2000237183 countsByYear W20002371832021 @default.
- W2000237183 countsByYear W20002371832022 @default.
- W2000237183 countsByYear W20002371832023 @default.
- W2000237183 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2000237183 hasAuthorship W2000237183A5013709891 @default.
- W2000237183 hasAuthorship W2000237183A5030811708 @default.
- W2000237183 hasAuthorship W2000237183A5036809584 @default.
- W2000237183 hasAuthorship W2000237183A5066638443 @default.
- W2000237183 hasAuthorship W2000237183A5080291972 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConcept C2777088508 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConcept C2779494336 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConcept C2780778865 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConcept C2780824555 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConceptScore W2000237183C121608353 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConceptScore W2000237183C126322002 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConceptScore W2000237183C141071460 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConceptScore W2000237183C167135981 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConceptScore W2000237183C2777088508 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConceptScore W2000237183C2779494336 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConceptScore W2000237183C2780047204 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConceptScore W2000237183C2780778865 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConceptScore W2000237183C2780824555 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConceptScore W2000237183C2780849966 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConceptScore W2000237183C61434518 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConceptScore W2000237183C71924100 @default.
- W2000237183 hasConceptScore W2000237183C72563966 @default.
- W2000237183 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2000237183 hasLocation W20002371831 @default.
- W2000237183 hasLocation W20002371832 @default.
- W2000237183 hasOpenAccess W2000237183 @default.
- W2000237183 hasPrimaryLocation W20002371831 @default.
- W2000237183 hasRelatedWork W1965335005 @default.
- W2000237183 hasRelatedWork W2000237183 @default.
- W2000237183 hasRelatedWork W2032003991 @default.
- W2000237183 hasRelatedWork W2133928959 @default.
- W2000237183 hasRelatedWork W2322968267 @default.
- W2000237183 hasRelatedWork W3015213037 @default.
- W2000237183 hasRelatedWork W3018711781 @default.
- W2000237183 hasRelatedWork W3081582545 @default.
- W2000237183 hasRelatedWork W3129013068 @default.
- W2000237183 hasRelatedWork W4307338567 @default.
- W2000237183 hasVolume "111" @default.
- W2000237183 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2000237183 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2000237183 magId "2000237183" @default.
- W2000237183 workType "article" @default.