FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000271931> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000271931 endingPage "2323" @default.
• W2000271931 startingPage "2321" @default.
• W2000271931 abstract "Purpose The routine use of antibiotics in oral implant treatment seems to be widespread. The principle of antibiotic prophylaxis before oral surgical procedures in patients at risk for endocarditis or in those who are severely immunocompromised is well established. Antibiotic therapy in conjunction with implant surgery in fit patients and its correlation with failure and success rates remains poorly documented, however. The debate regarding overprescription of antibiotics raises the need for a critical evaluation of proper antibiotic coverage in association with implant treatment. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively show and value the outcomes of dental implant treatment without antibiotic prophylaxis. Materials and Methods The study included 437 consecutively treated patients, in whom a total of 736 implants were placed. The population received no prophylactic antibiotics, but received anti-inflammatory therapy (nimesulide 100 mg twice daily or Arnica montana 5C 3 times a day) for 3 days postoperatively. Healing was evaluated at second-stage surgery (4 to 6 months postoperatively). Failure was defined as removal of the implant due to either signs of infection or nonosseointegration of the implant, according to the criteria for success described by Albrektsson and Coll in 1988. Results The implant survival rate in the sample (96.2%) was no lower than the high success rates published in the literature using various antibiotic regimens. Conclusions Our findings support the results of several recent reviews of minor use of antibiotics in oral surgery. These findings suggest that the use of antibiotics for routine oral implants may not be as beneficial as once believed and that clinicians should look forward to the reduction of their unnecessary use. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis before oral surgical procedures remains a controversial issue, poorly documented in the literature. The routine use of antibiotics in oral implant treatment seems to be widespread. The principle of antibiotic prophylaxis before oral surgical procedures in patients at risk for endocarditis or in those who are severely immunocompromised is well established. Antibiotic therapy in conjunction with implant surgery in fit patients and its correlation with failure and success rates remains poorly documented, however. The debate regarding overprescription of antibiotics raises the need for a critical evaluation of proper antibiotic coverage in association with implant treatment. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively show and value the outcomes of dental implant treatment without antibiotic prophylaxis. The study included 437 consecutively treated patients, in whom a total of 736 implants were placed. The population received no prophylactic antibiotics, but received anti-inflammatory therapy (nimesulide 100 mg twice daily or Arnica montana 5C 3 times a day) for 3 days postoperatively. Healing was evaluated at second-stage surgery (4 to 6 months postoperatively). Failure was defined as removal of the implant due to either signs of infection or nonosseointegration of the implant, according to the criteria for success described by Albrektsson and Coll in 1988. The implant survival rate in the sample (96.2%) was no lower than the high success rates published in the literature using various antibiotic regimens. Our findings support the results of several recent reviews of minor use of antibiotics in oral surgery. These findings suggest that the use of antibiotics for routine oral implants may not be as beneficial as once believed and that clinicians should look forward to the reduction of their unnecessary use. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis before oral surgical procedures remains a controversial issue, poorly documented in the literature." @default.
• W2000271931 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000271931 creator A5011283417 @default.
• W2000271931 creator A5067634276 @default.
• W2000271931 creator A5073309836 @default.
• W2000271931 date "2007-11-01" @default.
• W2000271931 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2000271931 title "Retrospective Analysis of 736 Implants Inserted Without Antibiotic Therapy" @default.
• W2000271931 cites W1977877202 @default.
• W2000271931 cites W1979613534 @default.
• W2000271931 cites W2009432849 @default.
• W2000271931 cites W2057410877 @default.
• W2000271931 cites W2097476876 @default.
• W2000271931 cites W2140904858 @default.
• W2000271931 cites W2148685521 @default.
• W2000271931 cites W2157260781 @default.
• W2000271931 cites W2161148627 @default.
• W2000271931 cites W4322701577 @default.
• W2000271931 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.620" @default.
• W2000271931 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17954332" @default.
• W2000271931 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2000271931 type Work @default.
• W2000271931 sameAs 2000271931 @default.
• W2000271931 citedByCount "51" @default.
• W2000271931 countsByYear W20002719312012 @default.
• W2000271931 countsByYear W20002719312013 @default.
• W2000271931 countsByYear W20002719312014 @default.
• W2000271931 countsByYear W20002719312015 @default.
• W2000271931 countsByYear W20002719312016 @default.
• W2000271931 countsByYear W20002719312017 @default.
• W2000271931 countsByYear W20002719312018 @default.
• W2000271931 countsByYear W20002719312019 @default.
• W2000271931 countsByYear W20002719312021 @default.
• W2000271931 countsByYear W20002719312022 @default.
• W2000271931 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000271931 hasAuthorship W2000271931A5011283417 @default.
• W2000271931 hasAuthorship W2000271931A5067634276 @default.
• W2000271931 hasAuthorship W2000271931A5073309836 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConcept C2778602436 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConcept C501593827 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConceptScore W2000271931C141071460 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConceptScore W2000271931C167135981 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConceptScore W2000271931C199343813 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConceptScore W2000271931C2778602436 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConceptScore W2000271931C2781411149 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConceptScore W2000271931C2908647359 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConceptScore W2000271931C501593827 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConceptScore W2000271931C71924100 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConceptScore W2000271931C86803240 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConceptScore W2000271931C89423630 @default.
• W2000271931 hasConceptScore W2000271931C99454951 @default.
• W2000271931 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W2000271931 hasLocation W20002719311 @default.
• W2000271931 hasLocation W20002719312 @default.
• W2000271931 hasOpenAccess W2000271931 @default.
• W2000271931 hasPrimaryLocation W20002719311 @default.
• W2000271931 hasRelatedWork W172862677 @default.
• W2000271931 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2000271931 hasRelatedWork W2036796680 @default.
• W2000271931 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2000271931 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2000271931 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2000271931 hasRelatedWork W2758390667 @default.
• W2000271931 hasRelatedWork W3131712780 @default.
• W2000271931 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2000271931 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2000271931 hasVolume "65" @default.
• W2000271931 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2000271931 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2000271931 magId "2000271931" @default.
• W2000271931 workType "article" @default.