FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000296855> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000296855 endingPage "48" @default.
• W2000296855 startingPage "40" @default.
• W2000296855 abstract "A data set of a commercial Nellore beef cattle selection program was used to compare breeding models that assumed or not markers effects to estimate the breeding values, when a reduced number of animals have phenotypic, genotypic and pedigree information available. This herd complete data set was composed of 83,404 animals measured for weaning weight (WW), post-weaning gain (PWG), scrotal circumference (SC) and muscle score (MS), corresponding to 116,652 animals in the relationship matrix. Single trait analyses were performed by MTDFREML software to estimate fixed and random effects solutions using this complete data. The additive effects estimated were assumed as the reference breeding values for those animals. The individual observed phenotype of each trait was adjusted for fixed and random effects solutions, except for direct additive effects. The adjusted phenotype composed of the additive and residual parts of observed phenotype was used as dependent variable for models' comparison. Among all measured animals of this herd, only 3160 animals were genotyped for 106 SNP markers. Three models were compared in terms of changes on animals' rank, global fit and predictive ability. Model 1 included only polygenic effects, model 2 included only markers effects and model 3 included both polygenic and markers effects. Bayesian inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods performed by TM software was used to analyze the data for model comparison. Two different priors were adopted for markers effects in models 2 and 3, the first prior assumed was a uniform distribution (U) and, as a second prior, was assumed that markers effects were distributed as normal (N). Higher rank correlation coefficients were observed for models 3_U and 3_N, indicating a greater similarity of these models animals' rank and the rank based on the reference breeding values. Model 3_N presented a better global fit, as demonstrated by its low DIC. The best models in terms of predictive ability were models 1 and 3_N. Differences due prior assumed to markers effects in models 2 and 3 could be attributed to the better ability of normal prior in handle with collinear effects. The models 2_U and 2_N presented the worst performance, indicating that this small set of markers should not be used to genetically evaluate animals with no data, since its predictive ability is restricted. In conclusion, model 3_N presented a slight superiority when a reduce number of animals have phenotypic, genotypic and pedigree information. It could be attributed to the variation retained by markers and polygenic effects assumed together and the normal prior assumed to markers effects, that deals better with the collinearity between markers." @default.
• W2000296855 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000296855 creator A5014874776 @default.
• W2000296855 creator A5037685796 @default.
• W2000296855 creator A5051339712 @default.
• W2000296855 creator A5062396281 @default.
• W2000296855 creator A5077784753 @default.
• W2000296855 creator A5090952609 @default.
• W2000296855 date "2012-08-01" @default.
• W2000296855 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2000296855 title "Study of using marker assisted selection on a beef cattle breeding program by model comparison" @default.
• W2000296855 cites W1523454857 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W1599031386 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W1628017834 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W1660492679 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W1786155944 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W1819387938 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W1928998639 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W1963924361 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W1969304249 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W1988745993 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W1995542001 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2013092977 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2034846276 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2048971218 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2057765075 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2067715889 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2091687313 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2095912423 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2113692018 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2122291037 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2130434665 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2141027886 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2154978106 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2160306032 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2164050502 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2171250718 @default.
• W2000296855 cites W2328277764 @default.
• W2000296855 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.03.017" @default.
• W2000296855 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2000296855 type Work @default.
• W2000296855 sameAs 2000296855 @default.
• W2000296855 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2000296855 countsByYear W20002968552015 @default.
• W2000296855 countsByYear W20002968552016 @default.
• W2000296855 countsByYear W20002968552017 @default.
• W2000296855 countsByYear W20002968552021 @default.
• W2000296855 countsByYear W20002968552022 @default.
• W2000296855 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000296855 hasAuthorship W2000296855A5014874776 @default.
• W2000296855 hasAuthorship W2000296855A5037685796 @default.
• W2000296855 hasAuthorship W2000296855A5051339712 @default.
• W2000296855 hasAuthorship W2000296855A5062396281 @default.
• W2000296855 hasAuthorship W2000296855A5077784753 @default.
• W2000296855 hasAuthorship W2000296855A5090952609 @default.
• W2000296855 hasBestOaLocation W20002968551 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C106934330 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C107673813 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C111350023 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C168743327 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C194775826 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C2780505807 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C44970651 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C49781872 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C58489278 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C61420037 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C6422946 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C81917197 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C105795698 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C106934330 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C107673813 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C111350023 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C126322002 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C140793950 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C154945302 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C168743327 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C194775826 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C199360897 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C2780505807 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C33923547 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C41008148 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C44970651 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C49781872 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C58489278 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C61420037 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C6422946 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C71924100 @default.
• W2000296855 hasConceptScore W2000296855C81917197 @default.

• next