FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000327500> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000327500 endingPage "55" @default.
• W2000327500 startingPage "47" @default.
• W2000327500 abstract "We propose a new framework for understanding studies of counselor-client agreement about their counseling. The framework includes five factors: the scope of counseling being studied (process, impact, or outcome), the dimension (index) being rated (in this study, session Depth, Smoothness, Positivity, or Arousal), the measure used to assess agreement (correlations or absolute differences), the level at which the analysis is conducted (session, client, or counselor), and the type of agreement--(a) consensus, the similarity of counselors' own ratings to clients' own ratings; (b) counselor awareness, the similarity of counselors' perceptions of their clients to clients' own ratings; (c) client awareness, the similarity of counselors' own ratings to clients' perceptions of their counselors; and (d) matched awareness, the similarity of counselors' perceptions of their clients to clients' perceptions of their counselors. In a study of session impact (scope), degree of agreement was found to vary substantially with each of the other factors--type of agreement, dimension rated, measure of agreement, and level of analysis. The answer to the question Do counselors and clients agree about their counseling? is another question, What do you mean by agree? Studies comparing counselors' and clients' ratings of their counseling and psychotherapy sessions have returned correlations that range from negligible to moderate (Berzins, Bednar, & Severy, 1975; Carkhuff & Burstein, 1970; Caskey, Barker, & Elliott, 1985; Garfield, Prager, & Bergin, 1971; LaCrosse, 1977; Mintz, Auerbach, Luborsky, & Johnson, 1973; Mintz, Luborsky, & Christoph, 1979; Orlinsky & Howard, 1975; Schwartz & Bernard, 1981; Shapiro, Struening, Shapiro, & Barten, 1976; Stiles, 1980; Stiles, Shapiro, & Firth, 1987; Stiles & Snow, 1984a). These studies were divergent, however, with respect to the aspect of counseling rated and how agreement was defined and assessed, as well as with respect to settings, samples, and measures. In this article, we propose a framework for classifying and thus better understanding the variability in these studies, and we report a study of counselor-client agreement that uses the new framework. Knowing how well counselors and clients agree is important because the strategies and goals that participants adopt in counseling may depend on their understanding of each other's views. In studying this understanding, it is important to distinguish consensus, the degree to which counselors' and clients' views coincide, from awareness, the degree to which each knows the other's views. Participants may evaluate their counseling differently (low consensus) and know this (high awareness), or they may evaluate their counseling similarly (high consensus) but not realize it (low awareness). Because counseling focuses primarily on the client, counselors may know how clients feel (high counselor awareness) even though clients have little understanding of their counselors (low client" @default.
• W2000327500 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000327500 creator A5006806593 @default.
• W2000327500 creator A5061724373 @default.
• W2000327500 creator A5068906137 @default.
• W2000327500 date "1988-01-01" @default.
• W2000327500 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2000327500 title "Counselor-client agreement on session impact." @default.
• W2000327500 cites W1966999933 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W1978725779 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W1990069712 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W1999153660 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2004062032 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2007487446 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2019463518 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2041209831 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2045545921 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2046465527 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2067782607 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2069736034 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2081092929 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2085030722 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2102874076 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2124902552 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2315426700 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2398649244 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2478039409 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2725947431 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2989196889 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W649777776 @default.
• W2000327500 cites W2023170718 @default.
• W2000327500 doi "https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.35.1.47" @default.
• W2000327500 hasPublicationYear "1988" @default.
• W2000327500 type Work @default.
• W2000327500 sameAs 2000327500 @default.
• W2000327500 citedByCount "48" @default.
• W2000327500 countsByYear W20003275002012 @default.
• W2000327500 countsByYear W20003275002013 @default.
• W2000327500 countsByYear W20003275002015 @default.
• W2000327500 countsByYear W20003275002016 @default.
• W2000327500 countsByYear W20003275002018 @default.
• W2000327500 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000327500 hasAuthorship W2000327500A5006806593 @default.
• W2000327500 hasAuthorship W2000327500A5061724373 @default.
• W2000327500 hasAuthorship W2000327500A5068906137 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConcept C2776818064 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConcept C2779182362 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConceptScore W2000327500C136764020 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConceptScore W2000327500C138885662 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConceptScore W2000327500C15744967 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConceptScore W2000327500C2776818064 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConceptScore W2000327500C2779182362 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConceptScore W2000327500C41008148 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConceptScore W2000327500C41895202 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConceptScore W2000327500C70410870 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConceptScore W2000327500C75630572 @default.
• W2000327500 hasConceptScore W2000327500C77805123 @default.
• W2000327500 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2000327500 hasLocation W20003275001 @default.
• W2000327500 hasOpenAccess W2000327500 @default.
• W2000327500 hasPrimaryLocation W20003275001 @default.
• W2000327500 hasRelatedWork W1981237115 @default.
• W2000327500 hasRelatedWork W1988185375 @default.
• W2000327500 hasRelatedWork W2026164700 @default.
• W2000327500 hasRelatedWork W2067443318 @default.
• W2000327500 hasRelatedWork W2075959928 @default.
• W2000327500 hasRelatedWork W2166481065 @default.
• W2000327500 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2000327500 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2000327500 hasRelatedWork W4233182480 @default.
• W2000327500 hasRelatedWork W4234742646 @default.
• W2000327500 hasVolume "35" @default.
• W2000327500 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2000327500 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2000327500 magId "2000327500" @default.
• W2000327500 workType "article" @default.