FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000424689> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000424689 endingPage "3540" @default.
• W2000424689 startingPage "3533" @default.
• W2000424689 abstract "The effects of rodents on forest regeneration have been highlighted in many ecological studies. In 2002 and 2003, the acorns of Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata were subjected to 12 different treatments. The daily dynamics and the amount of acorns that were finally left intact, predated in situ, or removed off were examined and documented. The ratios of acorns that were infested by bugs before and after predation by rodents were carefully documented. It was found that: (1) the ratios of acorns infested by bugs before and after predation by rodents showed significant difference (P > 0.05), suggesting that rodents would not prey on acorns during the predating process if acorns had been already infested by bugs. (2) When compared with the controls, the fate of acorns could be roughly classified into four types: acorns that were simply buried or placed on black paper showed no significant differences with the controls in their response to rodents, suggesting that rodents have no sensitivity to the little change of odor resulting from burying and may be more adapted to black background. Acorns attached with strings, dyed with black ink, cut into halves, or placed on white/green/red paper were predated in situ with much lower predation rates and lasted the same duration. Compared with the controls, the acorns were removed away by rodents with the same first day rate and the removal lasted longer. The final removal rate of the acorns by rodents was increased, whereas that of predation in situ was decreased, and none were left in the spot. This may suggest that rodents in this case increased their predation risk expectation and adopted a strategy of “less predation proportion in situ”. Acorns that were burnt were not predated in situ as well as removed in the first day, but the rates were raised to the maximum in the forth and fifth day and then declined to zero. Consequently, the final ratios of predation in situ and removal considerably decreased with many acorns, nearly 50%, being left intact. It can be hypothesized that the rodents responded to the change in odor of acorns by using the strategies of “less predation proportion in situ” and “less predating activities”, thereby resulting in larger number of acorns remained intact. Acorns that were enwrapped were barely predated in situ, removed in the first day with a normal predation rate, which declined to nearly zero in the second day and then increased till it declined again from the fourth day to the final day. The final rate of predation in situ was lower than 5% without acorns remained intact, and the rate of removal of acorns showed a considerable relative increase. This suggests that when there was a change in both odor and status of acorns, rodents also adopted the “spying” and “less predation proportion in situ” strategy, Because the predation risk is critical, the sense of sight would play an important role in rodent's living. (3) Definite amounts of acorns were predated in situ, discarded, removed away, predated ex situ, lost and hoarded separately." @default.
• W2000424689 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000424689 creator A5074047906 @default.
• W2000424689 creator A5077435124 @default.
• W2000424689 date "2006-11-01" @default.
• W2000424689 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2000424689 title "Predating strategy of rodents on acorns of Quercusaliena var. acuteserrata under different predating risks and fate of acorns" @default.
• W2000424689 cites W1968082217 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2001158403 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2015355783 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2040274790 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2063719915 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2068733288 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2071550351 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2127221598 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2165111556 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2314212453 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2320153067 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2324772833 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2325219974 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2327049760 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2328695883 @default.
• W2000424689 cites W2514269652 @default.
• W2000424689 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2032(06)60052-8" @default.
• W2000424689 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2000424689 type Work @default.
• W2000424689 sameAs 2000424689 @default.
• W2000424689 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2000424689 countsByYear W20004246892017 @default.
• W2000424689 countsByYear W20004246892019 @default.
• W2000424689 countsByYear W20004246892020 @default.
• W2000424689 countsByYear W20004246892021 @default.
• W2000424689 countsByYear W20004246892022 @default.
• W2000424689 countsByYear W20004246892023 @default.
• W2000424689 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000424689 hasAuthorship W2000424689A5074047906 @default.
• W2000424689 hasAuthorship W2000424689A5077435124 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConcept C144027150 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConcept C184932067 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConcept C188382862 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConcept C2777646061 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConcept C2779843388 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConcept C47559259 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConcept C90856448 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConceptScore W2000424689C144024400 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConceptScore W2000424689C144027150 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConceptScore W2000424689C149923435 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConceptScore W2000424689C184932067 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConceptScore W2000424689C188382862 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConceptScore W2000424689C18903297 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConceptScore W2000424689C2777646061 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConceptScore W2000424689C2779843388 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConceptScore W2000424689C2908647359 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConceptScore W2000424689C47559259 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConceptScore W2000424689C86803240 @default.
• W2000424689 hasConceptScore W2000424689C90856448 @default.
• W2000424689 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W2000424689 hasLocation W20004246891 @default.
• W2000424689 hasOpenAccess W2000424689 @default.
• W2000424689 hasPrimaryLocation W20004246891 @default.
• W2000424689 hasRelatedWork W1964942756 @default.
• W2000424689 hasRelatedWork W2012812906 @default.
• W2000424689 hasRelatedWork W2045627274 @default.
• W2000424689 hasRelatedWork W2126000116 @default.
• W2000424689 hasRelatedWork W2145667025 @default.
• W2000424689 hasRelatedWork W2620568287 @default.
• W2000424689 hasRelatedWork W2888232477 @default.
• W2000424689 hasRelatedWork W2891834978 @default.
• W2000424689 hasRelatedWork W4236980268 @default.
• W2000424689 hasRelatedWork W4324311346 @default.
• W2000424689 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W2000424689 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2000424689 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2000424689 magId "2000424689" @default.
• W2000424689 workType "article" @default.