FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000532929> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000532929 endingPage "722" @default.
• W2000532929 startingPage "722" @default.
• W2000532929 abstract "Context. Compensation programs have become a common tool to mitigate conflicts between farmers and large predators; however, their effectiveness is based on a series of assumptions that should be carefully and continuously assessed within an adaptive management framework. Ex-post compensation programs were adopted in Italy as a financial incentive to aid wolf conservation since the 1970s; however, their implementation has never been monitored nor actively managed in the past 35 years, during which time a remarkable recovery of wolf population and range expansion into more human-dominated landscapes has taken place. Aims. We hereby report on wolf-damage compensation programs in Italy and discuss their conservation value. Methods. We used data on wolf-damage compensation that we compiled at the national scale for the period 1991–95. Although not recent, these were unfortunately the only available data at the national scale, and were instrumental in supporting our discussion on compensation programs, as these are increasingly becoming a politically and economically sensitive issue. Key results. From 1991 to 1995, annual compensation costs represented on average 86% of the alleged losses to farmers, and averaged €1 825 440 (±169 760 s.d.), or about €5150 (±750) per wolf per year. Compensation costs varied markedly from region to region, although local differences were hardly explainable in terms of wolf densities and their trends at the regional scale. On the contrary, they appeared largely affected by inconsistencies in rules and procedures of regional compensation schemes. Conclusions. In the light of persistently high occurrence of wolf–livestock conflict, and widespread illegal killing of wolves, we argue that compensation programs in Italy currently provide no evidence of being a functional and cost-effective conservation tool. However, lack of monitoring of compensation costs in Italy at all institutional levels, including non-government organisations (NGOs), reveals that compensation policies are not being evaluated, nor is their effectiveness being assessed. Implications. We contend this is an unwise and unsustainable strategy to reduce the conflict, especially in the light of the recent increase in wolf numbers and, most importantly, a marked change in livestock husbandry practices. By emphasising the need for a thorough revision of the compensation schemes adopted for wolf conservation in Italy, we advocate new and theoretically sound solutions to current compensation policies." @default.
• W2000532929 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000532929 creator A5029287444 @default.
• W2000532929 creator A5056456536 @default.
• W2000532929 creator A5062210016 @default.
• W2000532929 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W2000532929 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2000532929 title "Ex-post compensation payments for wolf predation on livestock in Italy: a tool for conservation?" @default.
• W2000532929 cites W1965662167 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W1973605956 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W1975726482 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W1979776241 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W2020684992 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W2036934408 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W2060133491 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W2077068534 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W2084895727 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W2092494720 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W2117088457 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W2118094232 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W2121898755 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W2138175458 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W2145172040 @default.
• W2000532929 cites W2154179865 @default.
• W2000532929 doi "https://doi.org/10.1071/wr10029" @default.
• W2000532929 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2000532929 type Work @default.
• W2000532929 sameAs 2000532929 @default.
• W2000532929 citedByCount "67" @default.
• W2000532929 countsByYear W20005329292012 @default.
• W2000532929 countsByYear W20005329292013 @default.
• W2000532929 countsByYear W20005329292014 @default.
• W2000532929 countsByYear W20005329292015 @default.
• W2000532929 countsByYear W20005329292016 @default.
• W2000532929 countsByYear W20005329292017 @default.
• W2000532929 countsByYear W20005329292018 @default.
• W2000532929 countsByYear W20005329292019 @default.
• W2000532929 countsByYear W20005329292020 @default.
• W2000532929 countsByYear W20005329292021 @default.
• W2000532929 countsByYear W20005329292022 @default.
• W2000532929 countsByYear W20005329292023 @default.
• W2000532929 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000532929 hasAuthorship W2000532929A5029287444 @default.
• W2000532929 hasAuthorship W2000532929A5056456536 @default.
• W2000532929 hasAuthorship W2000532929A5062210016 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C112964050 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C147366489 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C166548495 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C188382862 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C20817334 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C2775917145 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C2780023022 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C29122968 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C29376679 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConcept C97137747 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C10138342 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C107826830 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C11171543 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C112964050 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C144024400 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C144133560 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C145097563 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C147366489 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C149923435 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C15744967 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C162324750 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C166548495 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C166957645 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C175444787 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C188382862 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C18903297 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C205649164 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C20817334 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C2775917145 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C2778755073 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C2779343474 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C2780023022 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C2908647359 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C29122968 @default.
• W2000532929 hasConceptScore W2000532929C29376679 @default.

• next