FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000642954> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000642954 endingPage "1165" @default.
• W2000642954 startingPage "1159" @default.
• W2000642954 abstract "Background Accurate detection of synchronous multifocal gastric cancer is mandatory for the successful management of stomach cancer. Objective We compared the sensitivities of gastroscopy and the current criterion standard of surgical resection and investigated the risk factors involved when clinicians fail to recognize additional gastric lesions. Design We performed a retrospective examination of the clinicopathological features of synchronous multifocal gastric carcinoma in a recent sample of gastrectomy patients. Patients In this study, we enrolled a total of 51 patients (5.17%) with synchronous multifocal gastric carcinoma who had undergone gastrectomy between 2005 and 2008. During that time, 80.43% of patients who had multifocal lesions underwent gastric resection. Main Outcome Measurements We compared preoperative gastroscopic findings with surgically resected stomach specimens. Results Synchronous multifocal gastric carcinoma was more frequent in older patients, males, and those with early gastric cancer. Using upper endoscopy, we missed accessory lesions in 14 (27.5%) of 51 patients. A total of 109 lesions were present in the resected stomachs, and upper endoscopy detected 93 of these (85.3% sensitivity). Thus, 16 lesions (14.67%) were missed out of a total of 109 gastric lesions. We found that small lesion size was the major risk factor for endoscopic failure to recognize additional lesions. Limitations Our study sample was small, and a large-scale study exploring these risk factors is warranted. Most of the study sample (80.39%) underwent subtotal gastrectomy; therefore, whole-stomach pathology could not be evaluated. Because early gastric cancer has a higher likelihood of being treated by EMR without surgery, there can be problems associated with reliance on surgical specimens. The findings of this study might have been affected by the higher rate of gastric cancers seen in East Asians. Conclusions The entire stomach should be examined with particular care during endoscopy procedures, especially when endoscopic resections of tumors are to be performed. Further, to improve detection, the approaches used to evaluate patients for multifocal tumors need to be improved. A large-scale prospective study is necessary to follow up on our findings. Accurate detection of synchronous multifocal gastric cancer is mandatory for the successful management of stomach cancer. We compared the sensitivities of gastroscopy and the current criterion standard of surgical resection and investigated the risk factors involved when clinicians fail to recognize additional gastric lesions. We performed a retrospective examination of the clinicopathological features of synchronous multifocal gastric carcinoma in a recent sample of gastrectomy patients. In this study, we enrolled a total of 51 patients (5.17%) with synchronous multifocal gastric carcinoma who had undergone gastrectomy between 2005 and 2008. During that time, 80.43% of patients who had multifocal lesions underwent gastric resection. We compared preoperative gastroscopic findings with surgically resected stomach specimens. Synchronous multifocal gastric carcinoma was more frequent in older patients, males, and those with early gastric cancer. Using upper endoscopy, we missed accessory lesions in 14 (27.5%) of 51 patients. A total of 109 lesions were present in the resected stomachs, and upper endoscopy detected 93 of these (85.3% sensitivity). Thus, 16 lesions (14.67%) were missed out of a total of 109 gastric lesions. We found that small lesion size was the major risk factor for endoscopic failure to recognize additional lesions. Our study sample was small, and a large-scale study exploring these risk factors is warranted. Most of the study sample (80.39%) underwent subtotal gastrectomy; therefore, whole-stomach pathology could not be evaluated. Because early gastric cancer has a higher likelihood of being treated by EMR without surgery, there can be problems associated with reliance on surgical specimens. The findings of this study might have been affected by the higher rate of gastric cancers seen in East Asians. The entire stomach should be examined with particular care during endoscopy procedures, especially when endoscopic resections of tumors are to be performed. Further, to improve detection, the approaches used to evaluate patients for multifocal tumors need to be improved. A large-scale prospective study is necessary to follow up on our findings." @default.
• W2000642954 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000642954 creator A5009536139 @default.
• W2000642954 creator A5012198775 @default.
• W2000642954 creator A5013755229 @default.
• W2000642954 creator A5058376995 @default.
• W2000642954 creator A5061760198 @default.
• W2000642954 creator A5075017758 @default.
• W2000642954 creator A5075481005 @default.
• W2000642954 creator A5085146978 @default.
• W2000642954 date "2010-06-01" @default.
• W2000642954 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2000642954 title "When do we miss synchronous gastric neoplasms with endoscopy?" @default.
• W2000642954 cites W1552103963 @default.
• W2000642954 cites W1984700231 @default.
• W2000642954 cites W1989283914 @default.
• W2000642954 cites W1992211374 @default.
• W2000642954 cites W2012403469 @default.
• W2000642954 cites W2050528953 @default.
• W2000642954 cites W2056470107 @default.
• W2000642954 cites W2064046894 @default.
• W2000642954 cites W2070930261 @default.
• W2000642954 cites W2098246580 @default.
• W2000642954 cites W2105423180 @default.
• W2000642954 cites W2106033134 @default.
• W2000642954 cites W2384546507 @default.
• W2000642954 cites W2415954496 @default.
• W2000642954 cites W345509695 @default.
• W2000642954 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.011" @default.
• W2000642954 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20381041" @default.
• W2000642954 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2000642954 type Work @default.
• W2000642954 sameAs 2000642954 @default.
• W2000642954 citedByCount "45" @default.
• W2000642954 countsByYear W20006429542012 @default.
• W2000642954 countsByYear W20006429542013 @default.
• W2000642954 countsByYear W20006429542014 @default.
• W2000642954 countsByYear W20006429542015 @default.
• W2000642954 countsByYear W20006429542016 @default.
• W2000642954 countsByYear W20006429542017 @default.
• W2000642954 countsByYear W20006429542018 @default.
• W2000642954 countsByYear W20006429542019 @default.
• W2000642954 countsByYear W20006429542020 @default.
• W2000642954 countsByYear W20006429542021 @default.
• W2000642954 countsByYear W20006429542022 @default.
• W2000642954 countsByYear W20006429542023 @default.
• W2000642954 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000642954 hasAuthorship W2000642954A5009536139 @default.
• W2000642954 hasAuthorship W2000642954A5012198775 @default.
• W2000642954 hasAuthorship W2000642954A5013755229 @default.
• W2000642954 hasAuthorship W2000642954A5058376995 @default.
• W2000642954 hasAuthorship W2000642954A5061760198 @default.
• W2000642954 hasAuthorship W2000642954A5075017758 @default.
• W2000642954 hasAuthorship W2000642954A5075481005 @default.
• W2000642954 hasAuthorship W2000642954A5085146978 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConcept C2779422922 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConcept C2780470880 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConcept C2781156865 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConcept C2993220764 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConcept C50440223 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConceptScore W2000642954C121608353 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConceptScore W2000642954C126322002 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConceptScore W2000642954C126838900 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConceptScore W2000642954C141071460 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConceptScore W2000642954C167135981 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConceptScore W2000642954C2778451229 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConceptScore W2000642954C2779422922 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConceptScore W2000642954C2780470880 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConceptScore W2000642954C2781156865 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConceptScore W2000642954C2993220764 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConceptScore W2000642954C50440223 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConceptScore W2000642954C71924100 @default.
• W2000642954 hasConceptScore W2000642954C90924648 @default.
• W2000642954 hasFunder F4320321142 @default.
• W2000642954 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2000642954 hasLocation W20006429541 @default.
• W2000642954 hasLocation W20006429542 @default.
• W2000642954 hasOpenAccess W2000642954 @default.
• W2000642954 hasPrimaryLocation W20006429541 @default.
• W2000642954 hasRelatedWork W156648849 @default.
• W2000642954 hasRelatedWork W1977492669 @default.
• W2000642954 hasRelatedWork W2030739786 @default.
• W2000642954 hasRelatedWork W2415058765 @default.
• W2000642954 hasRelatedWork W2418078754 @default.
• W2000642954 hasRelatedWork W2418169272 @default.
• W2000642954 hasRelatedWork W2474573788 @default.
• W2000642954 hasRelatedWork W2888544538 @default.
• W2000642954 hasRelatedWork W2940188326 @default.
• W2000642954 hasRelatedWork W3032201002 @default.
• W2000642954 hasVolume "71" @default.

• next