FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000643458> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000643458 endingPage "127" @default.
• W2000643458 startingPage "126" @default.
• W2000643458 abstract "In their recent article, Hartemink and McBratney (2008) provide ample evidence that, at present, “there is increasing attention for both soils and soil research”. They attempt to respond to “pessimisim, particularly in North America, on the future of soil science”, expressed by Baveye et al. (2006) and Hopmans (2007). Invoking the customary “droit de reponse”, we would like to explain here that, from our perspective, Hartemink and McBratney (2008) seem to have largely missed the point of the debate that Baveye et al. (2006) and, we believe, Hopmans (2007) as well, attempted to foster. This fundamental misinterpretation led Hartemink and McBratney (2008) to construe our position as pessimism, when in fact our keymessagewas an urgent (but hopeful) call to action. The debate is not at all about whether the research on soils is or is not attracting significant attention at present. By and large, that is a moot point! Three years ago, we referred to the research on soils and soil-related issues as “thriving” (Baveye et al., 2006, p. 509). Anyone looking at figure 6 of Baveye et al. (2006, p. 508), illustrating among other things the amazing rate of increase of the number of publications dealing with soils since the late eighties, would be forced to reach the same conclusion. And the trend has continued unabated since 2005, when the figure was compiled. In the Web of Science (Thomson Reuters) database, there are 19,153 entries in 2007 with the words “soil” or “soils” in the title, keywords or abstract (but not the wild card “soil*”, which would include lots of articles on soiled fabric). The Scopus database (Elsevier) has 25,762 corresponding entries for the same year. This latter number represents a mind-boggling 274% increase, relative to 1987, in the number of articles indexed annually by Scopus, and, for the soil researchers who need to keep abreast of the literature, an amazing lot of articles to absorb!!. Of course, to get an accurate picture, one would have to compare this increase with that of the scientific literature overall during the same period. That comparison is not straightforward, given the fact" @default.
• W2000643458 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000643458 creator A5000456329 @default.
• W2000643458 creator A5084710018 @default.
• W2000643458 date "2009-07-01" @default.
• W2000643458 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2000643458 title "Comment on “A soil science renaissance” by A.E. Hartemink and A. McBratney" @default.
• W2000643458 cites W2000655267 @default.
• W2000643458 cites W2009682477 @default.
• W2000643458 cites W2057761907 @default.
• W2000643458 cites W2096721887 @default.
• W2000643458 cites W2112411699 @default.
• W2000643458 cites W2130500485 @default.
• W2000643458 cites W2159020121 @default.
• W2000643458 cites W2159856789 @default.
• W2000643458 cites W3140945414 @default.
• W2000643458 cites W36988937 @default.
• W2000643458 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.03.020" @default.
• W2000643458 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2000643458 type Work @default.
• W2000643458 sameAs 2000643458 @default.
• W2000643458 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2000643458 countsByYear W20006434582016 @default.
• W2000643458 countsByYear W20006434582017 @default.
• W2000643458 countsByYear W20006434582018 @default.
• W2000643458 countsByYear W20006434582023 @default.
• W2000643458 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000643458 hasAuthorship W2000643458A5000456329 @default.
• W2000643458 hasAuthorship W2000643458A5084710018 @default.
• W2000643458 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2000643458 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2000643458 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2000643458 hasConcept C52069626 @default.
• W2000643458 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2000643458 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2000643458 hasConceptScore W2000643458C142362112 @default.
• W2000643458 hasConceptScore W2000643458C166957645 @default.
• W2000643458 hasConceptScore W2000643458C39432304 @default.
• W2000643458 hasConceptScore W2000643458C52069626 @default.
• W2000643458 hasConceptScore W2000643458C52119013 @default.
• W2000643458 hasConceptScore W2000643458C95457728 @default.
• W2000643458 hasIssue "3-4" @default.
• W2000643458 hasLocation W20006434581 @default.
• W2000643458 hasOpenAccess W2000643458 @default.
• W2000643458 hasPrimaryLocation W20006434581 @default.
• W2000643458 hasRelatedWork W109438073 @default.
• W2000643458 hasRelatedWork W201970133 @default.
• W2000643458 hasRelatedWork W2742081478 @default.
• W2000643458 hasRelatedWork W2795989554 @default.
• W2000643458 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2000643458 hasRelatedWork W2990422019 @default.
• W2000643458 hasRelatedWork W3136591192 @default.
• W2000643458 hasRelatedWork W3214775788 @default.
• W2000643458 hasRelatedWork W4722863 @default.
• W2000643458 hasRelatedWork W169326857 @default.
• W2000643458 hasVolume "151" @default.
• W2000643458 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2000643458 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2000643458 magId "2000643458" @default.
• W2000643458 workType "article" @default.