FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2000669941> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2000669941 endingPage "345" @default.
• W2000669941 startingPage "336" @default.
• W2000669941 abstract "Stroke patients often display deficits in language function, such as correctly naming objects. Our aim was to evaluate the reliability and the patterns of poststroke language recovery using a picture identification task during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 4 T. Four healthy subjects and 4 subjects with left middle cerebral artery stroke with chronic (>1 year) aphasia were enrolled in the study. In each subject, 10 fMRI scans were performed over a 10-week period using a picture-identification task. The active condition involved presenting subject with a panel of 4 figures (eg, drawings of 4 animals) every 6 seconds and asking the subject to indicate which figure matched the written name in the center. The control condition was a same/different judgment task with pairs of geometric figures (squares, octagons, or combination) presented every 6 seconds. Thirty-second active/control blocks were repeated 5 times each, and responses were recorded. The stoke subjects and controls had similar demographic characteristics, including age (46 vs 53 years), personal handedness (Edinburg Handedness Inventory, 89 vs 95), familial handedness (93 vs 95), and years of education (14.3 vs 14.8). For the active condition, the controls performed better than the stroke subjects (97.7% vs 89.1%; P < .001); the 2 groups performed similarly for the control condition (99.5% vs 98.8%; P = .23). On fMRI, the controls exhibited bilateral, L > R positive blood oxygenation level–dependent (BOLD) activations in frontal and temporal language areas and symmetric retrosplenial and posterior cingulate areas and symmetric negative BOLD activations in bilateral frontotemporal language networks. In contrast, the stroke subjects exhibited positive BOLD activations predominantly in peristroke areas and negative BOLD activations in the unaffected (right) hemisphere. Both groups displayed high activation reliability (as measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) in the left frontal and temporal language areas, although in the stroke subjects the ICC in the frontal regions was spread over a much larger peristroke area. This study documents the utility of the picture-identification task for poststroke language recovery evaluation. Our data suggest that adult stroke patients use functional peristroke areas to perform language functions. Stroke patients often display deficits in language function, such as correctly naming objects. Our aim was to evaluate the reliability and the patterns of poststroke language recovery using a picture identification task during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at 4 T. Four healthy subjects and 4 subjects with left middle cerebral artery stroke with chronic (>1 year) aphasia were enrolled in the study. In each subject, 10 fMRI scans were performed over a 10-week period using a picture-identification task. The active condition involved presenting subject with a panel of 4 figures (eg, drawings of 4 animals) every 6 seconds and asking the subject to indicate which figure matched the written name in the center. The control condition was a same/different judgment task with pairs of geometric figures (squares, octagons, or combination) presented every 6 seconds. Thirty-second active/control blocks were repeated 5 times each, and responses were recorded. The stoke subjects and controls had similar demographic characteristics, including age (46 vs 53 years), personal handedness (Edinburg Handedness Inventory, 89 vs 95), familial handedness (93 vs 95), and years of education (14.3 vs 14.8). For the active condition, the controls performed better than the stroke subjects (97.7% vs 89.1%; P < .001); the 2 groups performed similarly for the control condition (99.5% vs 98.8%; P = .23). On fMRI, the controls exhibited bilateral, L > R positive blood oxygenation level–dependent (BOLD) activations in frontal and temporal language areas and symmetric retrosplenial and posterior cingulate areas and symmetric negative BOLD activations in bilateral frontotemporal language networks. In contrast, the stroke subjects exhibited positive BOLD activations predominantly in peristroke areas and negative BOLD activations in the unaffected (right) hemisphere. Both groups displayed high activation reliability (as measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) in the left frontal and temporal language areas, although in the stroke subjects the ICC in the frontal regions was spread over a much larger peristroke area. This study documents the utility of the picture-identification task for poststroke language recovery evaluation. Our data suggest that adult stroke patients use functional peristroke areas to perform language functions." @default.
• W2000669941 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2000669941 creator A5013293200 @default.
• W2000669941 creator A5019737117 @default.
• W2000669941 creator A5020909854 @default.
• W2000669941 creator A5022118502 @default.
• W2000669941 creator A5068024517 @default.
• W2000669941 creator A5069859534 @default.
• W2000669941 creator A5074422323 @default.
• W2000669941 creator A5074517748 @default.
• W2000669941 date "2011-07-01" @default.
• W2000669941 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2000669941 title "Poststroke Aphasia Recovery Assessed With Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a Picture Identification Task" @default.
• W2000669941 cites W1965841848 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W1966890608 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W1967606727 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W1971845649 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W1972708427 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W1973787926 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W1979917823 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W1982701000 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W1983753999 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W1991614394 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2000493336 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2004688636 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2010084749 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2019622055 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2020890701 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2024578555 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2032187014 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2034390034 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2038514344 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2038514567 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2039987972 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2049745117 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2049988140 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2053700366 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2058713030 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2064602361 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2065518844 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2067724039 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2077894077 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2079856827 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2091895757 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2092876913 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2094863429 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2098328700 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2099440903 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2107191158 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2111299837 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2115544149 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2117933608 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2126919482 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2129974775 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2136022845 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2137873589 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2138062997 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2138732273 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2141403362 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2143466839 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2145802608 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2154848358 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2159309104 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2169731332 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W2411623662 @default.
• W2000669941 cites W3205926832 @default.
• W2000669941 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.02.003" @default.
• W2000669941 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2990790" @default.
• W2000669941 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20719532" @default.
• W2000669941 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2000669941 type Work @default.
• W2000669941 sameAs 2000669941 @default.
• W2000669941 citedByCount "45" @default.
• W2000669941 countsByYear W20006699412012 @default.
• W2000669941 countsByYear W20006699412013 @default.
• W2000669941 countsByYear W20006699412014 @default.
• W2000669941 countsByYear W20006699412015 @default.
• W2000669941 countsByYear W20006699412016 @default.
• W2000669941 countsByYear W20006699412017 @default.
• W2000669941 countsByYear W20006699412018 @default.
• W2000669941 countsByYear W20006699412019 @default.
• W2000669941 countsByYear W20006699412020 @default.
• W2000669941 countsByYear W20006699412021 @default.
• W2000669941 countsByYear W20006699412022 @default.
• W2000669941 countsByYear W20006699412023 @default.
• W2000669941 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2000669941 hasAuthorship W2000669941A5013293200 @default.
• W2000669941 hasAuthorship W2000669941A5019737117 @default.
• W2000669941 hasAuthorship W2000669941A5020909854 @default.
• W2000669941 hasAuthorship W2000669941A5022118502 @default.
• W2000669941 hasAuthorship W2000669941A5068024517 @default.
• W2000669941 hasAuthorship W2000669941A5069859534 @default.
• W2000669941 hasAuthorship W2000669941A5074422323 @default.
• W2000669941 hasAuthorship W2000669941A5074517748 @default.
• W2000669941 hasBestOaLocation W20006699412 @default.
• W2000669941 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2000669941 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2000669941 hasConcept C127413603 @default.

• next